where would top SLACs fall in an overall college ranking list?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Forbes:

17 Williams
19 CMC
23 Wellesley
24 Amherst
25 Bowdoin
27 Swarthmore
37 Pomona
47 Washington & Lee
48 Davidson

Davidson overhyped. T30-T35.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:asking as DH is saying these LA schools are equal prestige and education to at least the lower T20s and I disagree - think they should be lower. Yes great intimate educational experience, but can’t compare to a Vandy Rice Or WashU - should be lower imo -

can't compare in what way?

there's a lot that you can compare, obviously.

you could compare PhD placement or dining hall food.
you could compare 4-year graduation rates or mid-career income stats
you could compare golf teams or research grants.
you could compare start-up incubators or med school enrollment.

what are you asking? usually students have very specific feelings about small schools, either being very attracted or not at all interested.

This. My older DC chose Swat over Brown for engineering. My rising senior is only looking at SLACs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:asking as DH is saying these LA schools are equal prestige and education to at least the lower T20s and I disagree - think they should be lower. Yes great intimate educational experience, but can’t compare to a Vandy Rice Or WashU - should be lower imo -

can't compare in what way?

there's a lot that you can compare, obviously.

you could compare PhD placement or dining hall food.
you could compare 4-year graduation rates or mid-career income stats
you could compare golf teams or research grants.
you could compare start-up incubators or med school enrollment.

what are you asking? usually students have very specific feelings about small schools, either being very attracted or not at all interested.

This. My older DC chose Swat over Brown for engineering. My rising senior is only looking at SLACs.

What does that mean…Swat doesn’t really have engineering but you can do a 5 year program with Penn.

Like…what’s the point?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Williams and Amherst and Swarthmore are comparable to T12-18 private range. They have never had quite the same percentage of true top kids, partly because 1/3 of the student body is recruited. The intelligence of the top 1/3 is akin to the top 2/3 or so of most ivies (cornell pre-TO had SAT ranges lower than the other ivies).
The LACs from #3 to 15 or so, inclusive of Claremont, Davidson, Wellesley, have student bodies that parallel the T18-30 range schools.

Below the T15ish LAC’s the quality of the average student drops fast and typically one would much better off at a good flagship

Middlebury, harverford, Richmond have decent student quality. They are about t30.

Wellesley is among the top. T10-t20

Richmond?? No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How long before this thread devolves into a full on rock fight?

doesn’t have to be- just give your opinion and don’t undermine or attack others - easy peezy

[Anonymous]

Forbes:
.... 15 Vandy
.... 16 Dartmouth
17 Williams
..... 18 Brown
19 CMC
..... 20 Duke
..... 22 Cal Tech
23 Wellesley
24 Amherst
25 Bowdoin
27 Swarthmore
..... 28 USC
..... 30 Wash U
..... 32 Georgetown
..... 34 UVA
37 Pomona
..... 42 ND
47 Washington & Lee
48 Davidson

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:asking as DH is saying these LA schools are equal prestige and education to at least the lower T20s and I disagree - think they should be lower. Yes great intimate educational experience, but can’t compare to a Vandy Rice Or WashU - should be lower imo -

can't compare in what way?

there's a lot that you can compare, obviously.

you could compare PhD placement or dining hall food.
you could compare 4-year graduation rates or mid-career income stats
you could compare golf teams or research grants.
you could compare start-up incubators or med school enrollment.

what are you asking? usually students have very specific feelings about small schools, either being very attracted or not at all interested.

This. My older DC chose Swat over Brown for engineering. My rising senior is only looking at SLACs.

What does that mean…Swat doesn’t really have engineering but you can do a 5 year program with Penn.

Like…what’s the point?

Swat certainly does have a four-year engineering program.

[Anonymous]

WSJ:

5 CMC
10 Davidson
20 Harvey Mudd
35 Swarthmore
50 Washington & Lee
58 Lafayette
86 Wellesley
120 Amherst
174 Williams
191 Pomona

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:asking as DH is saying these LA schools are equal prestige and education to at least the lower T20s and I disagree - think they should be lower. Yes great intimate educational experience, but can’t compare to a Vandy Rice Or WashU - should be lower imo -

can't compare in what way?


what are you asking?

where would top SLACs fall in a prestige ranking of all colleges - performed by HR departments of forbes 500

[Anonymous]

very high prestige as measured by hiring from top firms. these are academically elite places, as someone said. certainly top 20. also, this squashes the athletic argument since athletes have better than average job placement out of top colleges.

if you were asking if someone in Peoria might be more impressed by Williams than Notre Dame, I would have said nope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:asking as DH is saying these LA schools are equal prestige and education to at least the lower T20s and I disagree - think they should be lower. Yes great intimate educational experience, but can’t compare to a Vandy Rice Or WashU - should be lower imo -

can't compare in what way?

there's a lot that you can compare, obviously.

you could compare PhD placement or dining hall food.
you could compare 4-year graduation rates or mid-career income stats
you could compare golf teams or research grants.
you could compare start-up incubators or med school enrollment.

what are you asking? usually students have very specific feelings about small schools, either being very attracted or not at all interested.

This. My older DC chose Swat over Brown for engineering. My rising senior is only looking at SLACs.

What does that mean…Swat doesn’t really have engineering but you can do a 5 year program with Penn.

Like…what’s the point?

Swat certainly does have a four-year engineering program.

It’s a general engineering degree. I don’t really see the point. No ability to major in EE or Mechanical or other engineering disciplines.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:WSJ:

5 CMC
10 Davidson
20 Harvey Mudd
35 Swarthmore
50 Washington & Lee
58 Lafayette
86 Wellesley
120 Amherst
174 Williams
191 Pomona

but if OP only cares about hiring, move the WSJ rankings from "overall" to "outcomes" and Williams is 16th.

I suspect this OP cares about outcomes, which per WSJ is
Graduation rate
Value added to graduate salary
Value added to loan default
Academic reputation

and not so much things like environment, which per WSJ is
Proportion of international students
Student diversity
Student inclusion
Staff diversity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:very high prestige as measured by hiring from top firms. these are academically elite places, as someone said. certainly top 20. also, this squashes the athletic argument since athletes have better than average job placement out of top colleges.

if you were asking if someone in Peoria might be more impressed by Williams than Notre Dame, I would have said nope.

great response

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WSJ:

5 CMC
10 Davidson
20 Harvey Mudd
35 Swarthmore
50 Washington & Lee
58 Lafayette
86 Wellesley
120 Amherst
174 Williams
191 Pomona

but if OP only cares about hiring, move the WSJ rankings from "overall" to "outcomes" and Williams is 16th.

I suspect this OP cares about outcomes, which per WSJ is
Graduation rate
Value added to graduate salary
Value added to loan default
Academic reputation

and not so much things like environment, which per WSJ is
Proportion of international students
Student diversity
Student inclusion
Staff diversity

If you mean by salaries…Williams drops to 245

I don’t see Williams ranked 16 for anything by WSJ

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:asking as DH is saying these LA schools are equal prestige and education to at least the lower T20s and I disagree - think they should be lower. Yes great intimate educational experience, but can’t compare to a Vandy Rice Or WashU - should be lower imo -

can't compare in what way?

there's a lot that you can compare, obviously.

you could compare PhD placement or dining hall food.
you could compare 4-year graduation rates or mid-career income stats
you could compare golf teams or research grants.
you could compare start-up incubators or med school enrollment.

what are you asking? usually students have very specific feelings about small schools, either being very attracted or not at all interested.

This. My older DC chose Swat over Brown for engineering. My rising senior is only looking at SLACs.

What does that mean…Swat doesn’t really have engineering but you can do a 5 year program with Penn.

Like…what’s the point?

Swat certainly does have a four-year engineering program.

It’s a general engineering degree. I don’t really see the point. No ability to major in EE or Mechanical or other engineering disciplines.

LOL--she doesn't need you to see the point. She's doing just fine.