There was nothing in the prompt that prevents the answer from discussing a political community of any persuasion. |
Thank god. Maybe fewer colleges will inquire about our 18 year old kids’ “Lived” experiences. As if they had ‘unlived’ ones. Such BS |
1. Because he got into/transferred in to Penn without studying or taking a test on his own |
Why is asking about the experiences one has lived "BS"? You have one. I have one. They are different. |
DP. Because it’s not designed to really learn about your lived experience (you think they give an F a bout it?) It’s used to identify their desired race and demographics. |
In the age of AI, it would be better for colleges to do away with essays all together. They can use all the other information on the application. Even the non-AI stuff isn’t necessarily true, and how would they know? |
+1 |
+1 came to say same |
Duke removed the diversity prompt from supplementals. Harvard reworded from “a diverse student body” to “a student body with a diversity of perspectives and experiences.” |
3. To support MAGA by working for President Trump, I would become Trump’s new Press Secretary. I know nothing about being a Press Secretary, but I would immediately become the best Press Secretary Trump (or Biden) has ever had. |
Which is the same thing. |
So what happens when the mediocre kids still don’t get in? Will they start replacing the AOs next? |
I'm glad there are consequences for all the woke nonsense. I hope they learn their lesson and they can go back to their core mission. I'm glad they have come to the conclusion that their core mission is academics and research and not social engineering. |
Sure, you could talk about anytime but these prompts didn't really exist before they banned affirmative action. These prompts were fishing for stories about race. |
+1000 All the woke supporters are now experiencing what it is like when the shoe is on the other foot. Good! |