Brianne Nadeau might not run for reelection

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can’t we have just one councilmember with a law enforcement, military, private sector background? Do we really need 10 “community activists”?

That's up to the voters.

DC gets exactly the council it deserves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can’t we have just one councilmember with a law enforcement, military, private sector background? Do we really need 10 “community activists”?

You all deserve everything bad that happens to you.

[Anonymous]

She will 100% run again. You think she can find another job that would pay her $140,000 a year for having no apparent skills?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She will 100% run again. You think she can find another job that would pay her $140,000 a year for having no apparent skills?

Yes, lobbying the DC Council like Catania does now. Silverman also does something similar after she fell on her face in the last election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She will 100% run again. You think she can find another job that would pay her $140,000 a year for having no apparent skills?

Yes, lobbying the DC Council like Catania does now. Silverman also does something similar after she fell on her face in the last election.

I’m embarrassed in advance for whatever company would hire her.

[Anonymous]

https://www.afslaw.com/attorneys/david-grosso

You forgot Grosso.

Basically Nadeau is going to shop herself around for the next year and a half.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who votes for her and why?

I voted for her because she was replacing Jim Graham. Turns out I prefer a modestly-corrupt councilman with a strong constituent services game to a performative progressive who does nothing but introduce tone-deaf virtue-signaling bills.

I want a political animal, not a PTA mom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who votes for her and why?

I voted for her because she was replacing Jim Graham. Turns out I prefer a modestly-corrupt councilman with a strong constituent services game to a performative progressive who does nothing but introduce tone-deaf virtue-signaling bills.

I want a political animal, not a PTA mom.

So your vote was a vote against the incumbents Who is re-electing her?

[Anonymous]

*incumbent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who votes for her and why?

I voted for her because she was replacing Jim Graham. Turns out I prefer a modestly-corrupt councilman with a strong constituent services game to a performative progressive who does nothing but introduce tone-deaf virtue-signaling bills.

I want a political animal, not a PTA mom.

So your vote was a vote against the incumbents Who is re-electing her?

DC's most mediocre white people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who votes for her and why?

I voted for her because she was replacing Jim Graham. Turns out I prefer a modestly-corrupt councilman with a strong constituent services game to a performative progressive who does nothing but introduce tone-deaf virtue-signaling bills.

I want a political animal, not a PTA mom.

So your vote was a vote against the incumbents Who is re-electing her?

DC's most mediocre white people.

"We don't want another Trump."

[Anonymous]

Who are mediocre white people? Liberal whites?

[Anonymous]

The big school redistricting issue is about to rear its ugly head with Mt. Pleasant potentially being zoned out of Jackson-Reed and as it’s unlikely she’ll stay in the public school system she’s likely to depart from the district.

Adios amiga.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who are mediocre white people? Liberal whites?

White people (and it's 99.9 percent white people) who parrot every GGW proposal without giving it an ounce of critical thought. White people who support ideas that benefit people of extreme privilege at the expense of POC. White people who paternalistically say they know what's best for the city's POC. This is Nadeau's base (and Allen's base).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The big school redistricting issue is about to rear its ugly head with Mt. Pleasant potentially being zoned out of Jackson-Reed and as it’s unlikely she’ll stay in the public school system she’s likely to depart from the district.

Adios amiga.

When will she announce that she’s not running again