Ban on AI regulation for 10 years in reconcilliation bill

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is all part of the Dark Enlightenment evil.

https://time.com/7269166/dark-enlightenment-history-essay/

Wow. Thanks for sharing this.

Unregulated AI is going to be so so crazy. I feel like we are in a bad movie.

Yup. Too bad republicans are too dumb, lazy and callous to understand the risks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is all part of the Dark Enlightenment evil.

https://time.com/7269166/dark-enlightenment-history-essay/

Wow. Thanks for sharing this.

Unregulated AI is going to be so so crazy. I feel like we are in a bad movie.

How TF are you going to regulate something that even the programmers do not understand HOW AI gets its answers? This isn't just a system doing complex searches and stringing them together. The systems and data can be in multiple countries, pipes of data changing by the millisecond and no one actually owning the data. There's 50,000 different companies and all most countries participating. Hullo?

I guess since you don't understand this, you have to chime in with generalities and show disapproval. Whatever.

You aren't regulating this, period. The code changes quickly by itself, and you aren't going to have someone doing code review when it's already obsolete ten seconds later. JFC, you people are more dense than lead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is all part of the Dark Enlightenment evil.

https://time.com/7269166/dark-enlightenment-history-essay/

Wow. Thanks for sharing this.

Unregulated AI is going to be so so crazy. I feel like we are in a bad movie.

How TF are you going to regulate something that even the programmers do not understand HOW AI gets its answers? This isn't just a system doing complex searches and stringing them together. The systems and data can be in multiple countries, pipes of data changing by the millisecond and no one actually owning the data. There's 50,000 different companies and all most countries participating. Hullo?

I guess since you don't understand this, you have to chime in with generalities and show disapproval. Whatever.

You aren't regulating this, period. The code changes quickly by itself, and you aren't going to have someone doing code review when it's already obsolete ten seconds later. JFC, you people are more dense than lead.

You’re right, I’m not a AI expert. But I see some HUGE potential risks. I would think it is more about how results are used and checks and balances rather than code review. But, like I said, you’re right that this isn’t my field of expertise.

Well, what’s your suggestion? Just throw our hands up and surrender to our future AI overlords?!? We have to at least try. Anyway, hope you read that article PP shared. You have a lot of negative energy, and I hope your day gets better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is all part of the Dark Enlightenment evil.

https://time.com/7269166/dark-enlightenment-history-essay/

Wow. Thanks for sharing this.

Unregulated AI is going to be so so crazy. I feel like we are in a bad movie.

How TF are you going to regulate something that even the programmers do not understand HOW AI gets its answers? This isn't just a system doing complex searches and stringing them together. The systems and data can be in multiple countries, pipes of data changing by the millisecond and no one actually owning the data. There's 50,000 different companies and all most countries participating. Hullo?

I guess since you don't understand this, you have to chime in with generalities and show disapproval. Whatever.

You aren't regulating this, period. The code changes quickly by itself, and you aren't going to have someone doing code review when it's already obsolete ten seconds later. JFC, you people are more dense than lead.

You’re right, I’m not a AI expert. But I see some HUGE potential risks. I would think it is more about how results are used and checks and balances rather than code review. But, like I said, you’re right that this isn’t my field of expertise.

Well, what’s your suggestion? Just throw our hands up and surrender to our future AI overlords?!? We have to at least try. Anyway, hope you read that article PP shared. You have a lot of negative energy, and I hope your day gets better.

NP I agree that we need to try but let’s be honest…if people can’t even voluntarily stop using social media when the harms are obvious and the benefits are so meaningless then how can we expect them to not use AI that promises to satiate their own greed and selfish desires?

[Anonymous]

Of course AI should be regulated. It's absurd to say, "gee it's hard so let's not bother."

[Anonymous]

Wouldn't this violate the Byrd Rule?

[Anonymous]

So, here we are:

Fluoride, saving people's teeth for a century, and we know exactly how it works: now deemed dangerous and being banned

AI: Destroying civilization and burning the Earth and we don't even know how it works. Must not be regulated for at least 10 years (which is performative nonsense anyway because Congress can change that law at any time).

Bonus: in the US Constitution, there one specific issue mentioned as not being allowed to be regulated for about 20 years. Guess what issue

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't this violate the Byrd Rule?

Yes, the article says that the Byrd Rule will be a problem for this provision, in the Senate

But the House of Representatives is the idiot chamber of Congress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans have added language to the budget reconciliation bill that ban states from regulating AI for 10 years:

https://www.theverge.com/news/666288/republican-ai-state-regulation-ban-10-years

First, why? Makes no sense.

Second, this tramples all over states rights.

First, it makes perfect sense. They want to get rich and monitor us. Spy on competitors. Steal IP.

Second, they don’t care about states rights. They like the dictator, hate democracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah republicans. They have no idea what damage can be done by bad policies, and when they finally learn it will be too late.

We"ve seen your idiotic nanny-state bad policies from unelected bureaucrats in action for decades.


Time to cut and gut it all.

You don’t know what a nanny state is, Margie MAGA. Go live in China for 6 months and get back to us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is all part of the Dark Enlightenment evil.

https://time.com/7269166/dark-enlightenment-history-essay/

Wow. Thanks for sharing this.

Unregulated AI is going to be so so crazy. I feel like we are in a bad movie.

How TF are you going to regulate something that even the programmers do not understand HOW AI gets its answers? This isn't just a system doing complex searches and stringing them together. The systems and data can be in multiple countries, pipes of data changing by the millisecond and no one actually owning the data. There's 50,000 different companies and all most countries participating. Hullo?

I guess since you don't understand this, you have to chime in with generalities and show disapproval. Whatever.

You aren't regulating this, period. The code changes quickly by itself, and you aren't going to have someone doing code review when it's already obsolete ten seconds later. JFC, you people are more dense than lead.

You’re right, I’m not a AI expert. But I see some HUGE potential risks. I would think it is more about how results are used and checks and balances rather than code review. But, like I said, you’re right that this isn’t my field of expertise.

Well, what’s your suggestion? Just throw our hands up and surrender to our future AI overlords?!? We have to at least try. Anyway, hope you read that article PP shared. You have a lot of negative energy, and I hope your day gets better.

NP I agree that we need to try but let’s be honest…if people can’t even voluntarily stop using social media when the harms are obvious and the benefits are so meaningless then how can we expect them to not use AI that promises to satiate their own greed and selfish desires?

You’re not paying attention. The bill is proposing to make it a crime to regulate AI for the next 10 years. Tell me why we need that provision? Why can’t we make laws as we understand it better? Or regulate facets of it?

[Anonymous]

The only reason why I can think that they want this is to churn out tons of AI-generated content during election time and NOT have that content flagged or marked as AI generated.

I know my older relatives fall for AI content all the damn time. It's sad. "I've lived in Virginia for 82 years and I never realized we had a beautiful coast like this. I must visit." Well, Aunt Naomi, that's a photo of Cabo de Roca in Portugal with a Virginia is for Lovers sign added to the cliff photo, soooo.