Juicy Couture OK for 14 year old?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see GAP or university names written on butts no

would it be different than seeing the word "juicy" if you did?

DP, but sweats with anything written on the a$$ are trashy. I don't care if it says fckin Harvard. What it REALLY says is, "Look at my a$$, it's my money-maker."

[Anonymous]

I don't think it makes any difference arguing modesty standards for teenaged girls with people on the internet that seem to have none. It's either trolling or autism on your part.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see GAP or university names written on butts no

would it be different than seeing the word "juicy" if you did?

DP, but sweats with anything written on the a$$ are trashy. I don't care if it says fckin Harvard. What it REALLY says is, "Look at my a$$, it's my money-maker."

I'd think "that person has pants that say harvard". But maybe you're wired different.

*shrug*

if there is some perv creeping on your daughter, the words on her pants aren't causing it. his perversion is.

[Anonymous]

Yes your wires are different for sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes your wires are different for sure.

+1

stop sexualizing sweatpants

jfc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see GAP or university names written on butts no

would it be different than seeing the word "juicy" if you did?

DP, but sweats with anything written on the a$$ are trashy. I don't care if it says fckin Harvard. What it REALLY says is, "Look at my a$$, it's my money-maker."

I'd think "that person has pants that say harvard". But maybe you're wired different.

*shrug*

if there is some perv creeping on your daughter, the words on her pants aren't causing it. his perversion is.

You are inventing a false dichotomy. This is a discussion about what clothes signal about a person, not whether there is a lecher in the bushes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see GAP or university names written on butts no

would it be different than seeing the word "juicy" if you did?

DP, but sweats with anything written on the a$$ are trashy. I don't care if it says fckin Harvard. What it REALLY says is, "Look at my a$$, it's my money-maker."

I'd think "that person has pants that say harvard". But maybe you're wired different.

*shrug*

if there is some perv creeping on your daughter, the words on her pants aren't causing it. his perversion is.

You are inventing a false dichotomy. This is a discussion about what clothes signal about a person, not whether there is a lecher in the bushes.

is OP's DD the type of person that her husband believes is being signalled? If not, why the concern... maybe his issue is with the girl's behavior, not the word on her pants.

[Anonymous]

Looks normal to me

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's the connection with juicy and the butt? I don't think anyone is reading into that too hard. Also, tell your husband to stop looking at her butt.

This is a stupid take.

Yeah, it's trashy. No need for her to be trashy and suggestive, this is where the parenting comes in.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see GAP or university names written on butts no

would it be different than seeing the word "juicy" if you did?

DP, but sweats with anything written on the a$$ are trashy. I don't care if it says fckin Harvard. What it REALLY says is, "Look at my a$$, it's my money-maker."

I'd think "that person has pants that say harvard". But maybe you're wired different.

*shrug*

if there is some perv creeping on your daughter, the words on her pants aren't causing it. his perversion is.

You are inventing a false dichotomy. This is a discussion about what clothes signal about a person, not whether there is a lecher in the bushes.

is OP's DD the type of person that her husband believes is being signalled? If not, why the concern... maybe his issue is with the girl's behavior, not the word on her pants.

This is willfully obtuse. I think we can charitably assume that OP and her husband do not want their daughter to signal "low-rent" (as PP put it) because their DD is nothing like that at all. Bad signaling invites unwanted and inappropriate attention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see GAP or university names written on butts no

would it be different than seeing the word "juicy" if you did?

DP, but sweats with anything written on the a$$ are trashy. I don't care if it says fckin Harvard. What it REALLY says is, "Look at my a$$, it's my money-maker."

Yup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see GAP or university names written on butts no

would it be different than seeing the word "juicy" if you did?

DP, but sweats with anything written on the a$$ are trashy. I don't care if it says fckin Harvard. What it REALLY says is, "Look at my a$$, it's my money-maker."

I'd think "that person has pants that say harvard". But maybe you're wired different.

*shrug*

if there is some perv creeping on your daughter, the words on her pants aren't causing it. his perversion is.

You are inventing a false dichotomy. This is a discussion about what clothes signal about a person, not whether there is a lecher in the bushes.

is OP's DD the type of person that her husband believes is being signalled? If not, why the concern... maybe his issue is with the girl's behavior, not the word on her pants.

This is willfully obtuse. I think we can charitably assume that OP and her husband do not want their daughter to signal "low-rent" (as PP put it) because their DD is nothing like that at all. Bad signaling invites unwanted and inappropriate attention.

So is the concern low-rent or sexual attention?

I'd argue that the style, cut etc. is more important than any words or logos. But I'd also argue that if you're concerned that someone is inappropriately paying attention to DD's body, it's a problem bigger than a word.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Daughters says it’s back in style but DH is uncomfortable that it has the word “Juicy” written on the butt. He thinks it’s trashy and overly sexual for a middle schooler. Thoughts? Unreasonable?

Wow, $98 for a pair of pants now! Did somebody discover their mother's lounge wear? I just got rid of mine in an overdue purge.

[Anonymous]

Get her one of the styles that doesn’t say Juicy on the butt? I remember being a similar age and being obsessed with Juicy and I cringe about it now…her time will come.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see GAP or university names written on butts no

would it be different than seeing the word "juicy" if you did?

DP, but sweats with anything written on the a$$ are trashy. I don't care if it says fckin Harvard. What it REALLY says is, "Look at my a$$, it's my money-maker."

I'd think "that person has pants that say harvard". But maybe you're wired different.

*shrug*

if there is some perv creeping on your daughter, the words on her pants aren't causing it. his perversion is.

You are inventing a false dichotomy. This is a discussion about what clothes signal about a person, not whether there is a lecher in the bushes.

is OP's DD the type of person that her husband believes is being signalled? If not, why the concern... maybe his issue is with the girl's behavior, not the word on her pants.

This is willfully obtuse. I think we can charitably assume that OP and her husband do not want their daughter to signal "low-rent" (as PP put it) because their DD is nothing like that at all. Bad signaling invites unwanted and inappropriate attention.

So is the concern low-rent or sexual attention?

I'd argue that the style, cut etc. is more important than any words or logos. But I'd also argue that if you're concerned that someone is inappropriately paying attention to DD's body, it's a problem bigger than a word.

You live in a world of make-believe. We'd all love to live in a world where a girl can have Juicy written on her a$$ and it brings no negative attention. But that is not the real world. It is a world of your own invention.