North Carolina Republicans decide that only Republican votes count.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why must these absentee voters prove their identities?

Identity is proven when you register to vote. Identity is proven when you verify your SSN when requesting the ballot.
Identity is proven when the signature on the ballot has to match the signature on your state issued ID.

They wanted a little more verification. I feel I could cast a ballot in someone else's name pretty easily with the restrictions you listed, depending on how voter registration is done.

I think the signature one is the hardest to 'fake' tbh. My dad has dementia. He can no longer sign his name like he did on his license, so he's been unable to vote by absentee ballot over the last election cycle. His dementia isn't so bad right now to where he doesn't know what's going on. He knew the candidates. He knew our President at the time when he voted. He knows who our President is now.

He provided a sample of his current signature for it to be compared to his license signature for ballot verification and the lady at the board of elections office confirmed that his vote wouldn't be certified due to the discrepancies. So, in-person voting it is for him until he's not able to understand the candidates or the purpose of the election.

The signature my jurisdiction has is from when I was 18. I am in my 50's now. same signature on my license as is in the voting archive. My signature hasn't been the same in any decade. The whole signature thing is a crock.

[Anonymous]

How is it possible in 2025 that a looney tunes band of repugnants can decide to just not accept the votes of the opposing party because they are butthurt they lost? Why is anyone going along with this and how is this even legal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible in 2025 that a looney tunes band of repugnants can decide to just not accept the votes of the opposing party because they are butthurt they lost? Why is anyone going along with this and how is this even legal?

Because Republicans (and Democrats) protect those in their own tribe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible in 2025 that a looney tunes band of repugnants can decide to just not accept the votes of the opposing party because they are butthurt they lost? Why is anyone going along with this and how is this even legal?

Because Republicans (and Democrats) protect those in their own tribe.

Please name a time that democrats tried to steal an election and this blatantly.

[Anonymous]

This makes me want to weep with relief. They tried to steal the election. It didn't work, this time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This makes me want to weep with relief. They tried to steal the election. It didn't work, this time.

Officially another nut job. And the decline of the Carolina’s continues sadly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This makes me want to weep with relief. They tried to steal the election. It didn't work, this time.

Officially another nut job. And the decline of the Carolina’s continues sadly.

It’s cool, just say that you hate women. Don’t get depressed, though, you can still fly your loser flag of southern surrender and hang with the other losers down in election loserville.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This makes me want to weep with relief. They tried to steal the election. It didn't work, this time.

Glad to see that democracy prevailed despite the ongoing Republican efforts to overturn an election.

[Anonymous]

And this is why I no longer travel there and turned down college offers there. The whole anti masking thing last year was a clue that they were leaving the GOP and going maga

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This makes me want to weep with relief. They tried to steal the election. It didn't work, this time.

Glad to see that democracy prevailed despite the ongoing Republican efforts to overturn an election.

Oh thank goodness!!
What a relief. Maybe there is some sanity there

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And this is why I no longer travel there and turned down college offers there. The whole anti masking thing last year was a clue that they were leaving the GOP and going maga

High Point's and ECU's loss, I guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And this is why I no longer travel there and turned down college offers there. The whole anti masking thing last year was a clue that they were leaving the GOP and going maga

I was born and raised in NC and am proud to have escaped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This makes me want to weep with relief. They tried to steal the election. It didn't work, this time.

Officially another nut job. And the decline of the Carolina’s continues sadly.

Keep your filthy fetish to yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And this is why I no longer travel there and turned down college offers there. The whole anti masking thing last year was a clue that they were leaving the GOP and going maga

What anti-masking thing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why must these absentee voters prove their identities?

Identity is proven when you register to vote. Identity is proven when you verify your SSN when requesting the ballot.
Identity is proven when the signature on the ballot has to match the signature on your state issued ID.

They wanted a little more verification. I feel I could cast a ballot in someone else's name pretty easily with the restrictions you listed, depending on how voter registration is done.

And yet, there is no proof that this is a widespread issue, and ironically, when it has been caught, it has been GOP voters who do it.

I remember a congressional race in North Carolina overturned because of absentee ballot fraud.