| In our house it’s pretty clear DC’s “vibe” about the schools is 100 percent driven by HS classmate discussion on social media. |
Exactly! Only way I'm "providing input" is if my kid's #1 criteria is "how good is the football/basketball team" or "How awesome is the Greek system at U of X". Sure they can want that Rah, rah big university sports feel or a school with a Greek system, but that should not be the deciding factor, or Top factors in making a decision. Academics, programs and extras for their major should be in the top deciding factors, then the rest. |
So perfect plan. You set budget priorities before applying, and let your DD make the ultimate decision. I just hate when parents push their own choices on their kids. It's your kids time to do college how they want, you had your choice when you went, so now it's time for them to find the right space for them. And yes, discussing finances is a good thing---explaining what going to a cheaper school means---can you help with grad school then, will you give them X amount saved for life after college, etc? And help them see what taking on loans truly means and help them realize if it's worth it or not. |
But earnings are so different based on major and Where you end up working. Of course Engineers in Boston or NYC or silicon valley make more than engineers in Baltimore or Nebraska |
I'm the PP: totally get what you mean! So many parents do not do that---they want to let their kid see where they get into, let them fall in love with a T25, when the parents know they won't get FA and they cannot really afford the $90K+/year. and IMO, you don't let your kid do that or get excited about schools you know you cannot afford (and ones like T25 that really do NOT give merit--20 merit awards at a school that admits 2K students is not really giving merit---odds of your kid getting that are slim to none, even lower than them being admitted) And I find parents who do that then also don't really ensure their kid has good targets and safeties. IMO, it's not a target or safety (or really a reach either) if you know you wont' be able to afford it. |
+1 based on my experience of working with and hiring people from all kinds of schools, I am confident that most of the outcome comes down to the choice of major/career field and how engaged the student chooses to be in college. Good colleges (thinking top 200ish, including universities and LACs) have plenty of opportunities. Some schools obviously have strengths in some areas and most tend to have students who end up working in the region of the college. Major + region = post grad salary much more than anything special about a particular school. |
It’s tough for non-science and tech kids. My dd is very pragmatic and wants to make money, but none of those high pay majors fit her. She is thinking accounting or law but with zero joy about it. |
| I agree that the factor of ROI isn’t much different from major in that they are intertwined and both are subject to change in college. 70% of undergraduates change their majors. But in the end, you do your best with the information at hand. I like the approach of having criteria that promote conversation and encourage rational decision making. And of course, agreeing on finances beforehand. |
Haha! OP here and merch almost made the spreadsheet but DD reconsidered. In the end, she loves her top choice’s merch, so maybe that was her implicit bias as she scored other factors, lol. |
|
My theory is, this is their first major decision and they have to feel good about it. It’s their life and I can give guidance, but ultimately it’s their decision, barring the financial stuff.
If they wanna base it on merch, they can, but I don’t think they’re really that stupid, and then they will have to live with the consequences of that decision and that’s OK. |
|
We made a similar spreadsheet. DC broke down some of the categories. For example, there was campus size, aesthetic, ability to get around without a car, college town or lack there of, etc. DC focused on the things that would affect their day-to-day over 4 years.
Distance for them was about travel logistics. There may be tons of flights to the closest airport, but then the drive to college is 60-90 more minutes. It takes less time to get to a school in one mid-western city than it does to drive to one in our state, as another example. We did include tuition, but had a low weighting. Once DC filled if out, it helped support their gut feeling about which school was right for them. It also made it easier to release schools they liked without second guessing. |
We discussed these points but don't think we were as "formal". Is it within our budget? Did you like the place when we toured? Thats really it. |
YUP! 99% of your success is what you do, not "where you do it". That is why it really does NOT matter where you go. Go to where you can afford, where you like it and will thrive and have the most opportunities to be cream of the crop. |
So pick what she actually wants to do and find a path. Plenty of English majors make $200K+ 10 years down the road. But they just have to work a bit harder than a CS/Engineering major to get there. They have to take risks and find a path to what they want as a career. Not many places just screaming "I need someone with a BA in English". But don't do something you hate just for money. You can and should find a happy medium. |
As long as the schools meet a minimum level of competence. But if my kid wants a school ranked 100 over one ranked 65, I'm fine with that. because there really isn't that much difference. If my kid wants one ranked 350 over one ranked 75, then we will have a bit of a discussion to figure out why, and weigh the pros/cons of the two schools. And if they are similarly priced, even more reason to have that detailed discussion. |