NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy to validate voters? Yeah, no it’s not. If there’s nothing to hide I do not see a problem. JFC.

Agree completely.

First off, the ballots should be excluded as they were cast by voters who were not properly registered because they did not provide their state driver's license numbers or Social Security numbers as a 2004 state law required.

Second, for all anybody knows, all 60k ballots could be for the republican candidate. You don’t know.

This case is a matter of ballot integrity. Do you want integrity or fraud?

To be clear: why is it “fraud” when Republicans lose elections? Or are you suggesting that all votes without these numbers be thrown out from all elections including those where Republicans won?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey I found some voter fraud in North Carolina! Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows was registered to vote in two states including in Virginia and a mobile home in North Carolina his wife rented for two months - but he never visited - that he listed as his home. But voter fraud doesn’t count when republicans do it!

https://www.cbs17.com/news/former-trump-chief-meadows-nc-voter-registration-in-question/amp/

Old news.

Yet never addressed. Republicans ignore their own ACTUAL fraud while shrieking from the rooftops about everyone else's imaginary fraud.

[Anonymous]

Among those 60,000 ballots questioned are those of the winning judge’s own parents. They have since come out and clarified that yes, they’re registered voters, they’ve voted in every election, they’ve never before been questioned, and that yes, they voted for their own daughter. In case you want an idea of how insane this whole thing is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy to validate voters? Yeah, no it’s not. If there’s nothing to hide I do not see a problem. JFC.

Agree completely.

First off, the ballots should be excluded as they were cast by voters who were not properly registered because they did not provide their state driver's license numbers or Social Security numbers as a 2004 state law required.

Second, for all anybody knows, all 60k ballots could be for the republican candidate. You don’t know.

This case is a matter of ballot integrity. Do you want integrity or fraud?

To be clear: why is it “fraud” when Republicans lose elections? Or are you suggesting that all votes without these numbers be thrown out from all elections including those where Republicans won?

Yes, even where Republicans won. It’s a law from 2004. Why are you ok with fraud? If the votes are not legal, they’re not legal. Seems simple

[Anonymous]

There’s a lot of misinformation in this thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy to validate voters? Yeah, no it’s not. If there’s nothing to hide I do not see a problem. JFC.

DCUM liberals are the worse. Completely selfish. Unable to follow any laws

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy to validate voters? Yeah, no it’s not. If there’s nothing to hide I do not see a problem. JFC.

If you don't see a problem then it's because you are as corrupt as the judges.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy to validate voters? Yeah, no it’s not. If there’s nothing to hide I do not see a problem. JFC.

If you don't see a problem then it's because you are as corrupt as the judges.

The judges that want to uphold the 20 year old law are corrupt?

[Anonymous]

60k is a lot! That would affect multiple offices. So ALL races must be invalidated or none.

This is such BS by sore losers. Go ahead, try to invalidate. You are be crushed in 2026.

[Anonymous]

"The first of these three categories is the “Incomplete Voter Registrations,” in
which Griffin challenges ballots cast by voters who are not properly registered,
because they purportedly have never provided either their driver’s license numbers
or the last four digits of their social security numbers with their registration.
The second category is the “Lack of Photo Identification for Overseas Voters,”
wherein Griffin challenges ballots of certain citizens living overseas and of certain
members of the military, their spouses, and dependents, which were cast pursuant to
GRIFFIN V. N.C. STATE BD. OF ELECTIONS
Opinion of the Court
- 4 -
General Statutes Chapter 163, Article 21A, for failing to include a copy of their photo
identification or an “Identification Exception Form” with their respective ballot. See
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-230.1(a)(4) (2023) (requiring absentee voters under Article 20
to provide a copy of their photographic identification as described in N.C. Gen. Stat.
§ 163-166.16(a) or an affidavit as described in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-166.16(d) with
their absentee ballots).
The third category is the “Never Residents” category. Griffin challenges the
eligibility of overseas citizens who voted but were never domiciled or resided in North
Carolina and have never indicated they intend live in this state, but whose parents
or legal guardians were purportedly registered or eligible North Carolina voters prior
to leaving the United States."

Yes, cancel their ability to vote. You do it properly or you don't vote. Tired of the shenanigans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"The first of these three categories is the “Incomplete Voter Registrations,” in
which Griffin challenges ballots cast by voters who are not properly registered,
because they purportedly have never provided either their driver’s license numbers
or the last four digits of their social security numbers with their registration.
The second category is the “Lack of Photo Identification for Overseas Voters,”
wherein Griffin challenges ballots of certain citizens living overseas and of certain
members of the military, their spouses, and dependents, which were cast pursuant to
GRIFFIN V. N.C. STATE BD. OF ELECTIONS
Opinion of the Court
- 4 -
General Statutes Chapter 163, Article 21A, for failing to include a copy of their photo
identification or an “Identification Exception Form” with their respective ballot. See
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-230.1(a)(4) (2023) (requiring absentee voters under Article 20
to provide a copy of their photographic identification as described in N.C. Gen. Stat.
§ 163-166.16(a) or an affidavit as described in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-166.16(d) with
their absentee ballots).
The third category is the “Never Residents” category. Griffin challenges the
eligibility of overseas citizens who voted but were never domiciled or resided in North
Carolina and have never indicated they intend live in this state, but whose parents
or legal guardians were purportedly registered or eligible North Carolina voters prior
to leaving the United States."

Yes, cancel their ability to vote. You do it properly or you don't vote. Tired of the shenanigans.

Do you really believe these ppl ONLY voted for the Judge? Because if they cast a vote for ANYONE this means the entire election needs to be re-run.

You cool with that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:60k is a lot! That would affect multiple offices. So ALL races must be invalidated or none.

This is such BS by sore losers. Go ahead, try to invalidate. You are be crushed in 2026.

So wait a minute. When Republicans follow the law, they're wrong?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"The first of these three categories is the “Incomplete Voter Registrations,” in
which Griffin challenges ballots cast by voters who are not properly registered,
because they purportedly have never provided either their driver’s license numbers
or the last four digits of their social security numbers with their registration.
The second category is the “Lack of Photo Identification for Overseas Voters,”
wherein Griffin challenges ballots of certain citizens living overseas and of certain
members of the military, their spouses, and dependents, which were cast pursuant to
GRIFFIN V. N.C. STATE BD. OF ELECTIONS
Opinion of the Court
- 4 -
General Statutes Chapter 163, Article 21A, for failing to include a copy of their photo
identification or an “Identification Exception Form” with their respective ballot. See
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-230.1(a)(4) (2023) (requiring absentee voters under Article 20
to provide a copy of their photographic identification as described in N.C. Gen. Stat.
§ 163-166.16(a) or an affidavit as described in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-166.16(d) with
their absentee ballots).
The third category is the “Never Residents” category. Griffin challenges the
eligibility of overseas citizens who voted but were never domiciled or resided in North
Carolina and have never indicated they intend live in this state, but whose parents
or legal guardians were purportedly registered or eligible North Carolina voters prior
to leaving the United States."

Yes, cancel their ability to vote. You do it properly or you don't vote. Tired of the shenanigans.

The Dem candidates parents are on the invalid list and were properly registered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:60k is a lot! That would affect multiple offices. So ALL races must be invalidated or none.

This is such BS by sore losers. Go ahead, try to invalidate. You are be crushed in 2026.

So wait a minute. When Republicans follow the law, they're wrong?

No. How is it possible only this race is impacted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The first of these three categories is the “Incomplete Voter Registrations,” in
which Griffin challenges ballots cast by voters who are not properly registered,
because they purportedly have never provided either their driver’s license numbers
or the last four digits of their social security numbers with their registration.
The second category is the “Lack of Photo Identification for Overseas Voters,”
wherein Griffin challenges ballots of certain citizens living overseas and of certain
members of the military, their spouses, and dependents, which were cast pursuant to
GRIFFIN V. N.C. STATE BD. OF ELECTIONS
Opinion of the Court
- 4 -
General Statutes Chapter 163, Article 21A, for failing to include a copy of their photo
identification or an “Identification Exception Form” with their respective ballot. See
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-230.1(a)(4) (2023) (requiring absentee voters under Article 20
to provide a copy of their photographic identification as described in N.C. Gen. Stat.
§ 163-166.16(a) or an affidavit as described in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-166.16(d) with
their absentee ballots).
The third category is the “Never Residents” category. Griffin challenges the
eligibility of overseas citizens who voted but were never domiciled or resided in North
Carolina and have never indicated they intend live in this state, but whose parents
or legal guardians were purportedly registered or eligible North Carolina voters prior
to leaving the United States."

Yes, cancel their ability to vote. You do it properly or you don't vote. Tired of the shenanigans.

Do you really believe these ppl ONLY voted for the Judge? Because if they cast a vote for ANYONE this means the entire election needs to be re-run.

You cool with that?

Yes. Are you?