D.C.'s "sanctuary city" status in question after webpage removed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bowser, bending the knee.

She needs to resign.

+1.

I read the article and Bowser had the nerve to say this:

"It's misleading to suggest to anyone that if you're violating immigration laws, that this is a place where you can violate immigration laws," Bowser said. "You are vulnerable to federal immigration enforcement."

What exactly is wrong with this statement?

Because it’s cowardly.

A real mayor would defend residents of the city. [/quote

A mayor cannot overrule Federal law or prevent Federal enforcement. A mayor controls local law enforcement.

I'm sorry if you all aren't smart enough to understand what a "sanctuary city" is or that the District Government and the Federal Government are not the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bowser, bending the knee.

She needs to resign.

+1.

I read the article and Bowser had the nerve to say this:

"It's misleading to suggest to anyone that if you're violating immigration laws, that this is a place where you can violate immigration laws," Bowser said. "You are vulnerable to federal immigration enforcement."

What exactly is wrong with this statement?

Because it’s cowardly.

A real mayor would defend residents of the city.

A mayor cannot overrule Federal law or prevent Federal enforcement. A mayor controls local law enforcement.

I'm sorry if you all aren't smart enough to understand what a "sanctuary city" is or that the District Government and the Federal Government are not the same.