Unfortunately I think you're right. |
Maybe you should speak with Congress about fully funding ADA and IDEA. |
It’s not going to get better. It’s going to go away. Some of you are just so naive. |
Nope it won’t be good for kids with disabilities. |
|
I’m very worried about our lovely special ed teachers. They deserve to stay in the current billets, not get shuffled around.
Also, we pay for private, so my kids could survive without his IEP, but not everyone in our school can. His classmates need those services if they can’t pay. |
Why does a plan matter? There are unelected people with no accountability going into federal agencies accessing classified information, cutting off the funds to programs, locking the doors of government agencies, barring employees from entering, and shutting off their access from email. When this happens to the department of education your child will definitely be impacted. |
| I’ve been talking about this for years. Republicans want to abolish the DOE because they don’t want to pay for special education at the state and local levels which is governed federally and incredibly expensive. They should be ashamed for wanting to take away resources from our most vulnerable children and their families. It’s despicable. |
| The entire system is an absolute waste of money! |
I’m sorry, but you’re in the kids with special needs and disabilities forum. You seem to have wandered in by accident |
You are disgusting. Please take your hatred elsewhere. And when one of your children or grandchildren need help, don’t look to society at large for any help. |
The Dept. of Ed's actual functions are really misunderstood. It's mostly a bank that distributes guidance and federal $ that Congress appropriates for Pell Grants, Title 1, IDEA, and some relatively tiny other grant programs, like for HBCUs. Implementation/IEPs are at the state and mostly local levels. As a PP said, if you want it to get better, Congress needs to actually fund IDEA and the ADA (which it never has, not even close). That's why the Trump rhetoric re: giving power to the states on this issue is misleading - they already have the authority, just not enough $. The Dept. of Ed does investigate civil rights violations under IDEA, which DOGE will almost certainly cut. And it seems likely that IDEA and Title 1 funding, which pay for many SPED positions at schools, will be diminished more. This is bad for kids. |
Do you know what it a real waste of money. Locking people out of their places of work and email systems while the US government continues to pay civil servants for work that DOGE single handedly has stopped them from doing. Don't forget about the loss of productivity that is happening across all government agencies due to the turmoil and stress of workers being let go without cause, the nightly threatening emails that FEDS are getting and the unnecessary restructuring. How about all the money that is now being spent on finding new worksites (building leases) and equipment (computers, desks, chairs, phones) for federal workers to use when they already have perfectly functioning worksites they aren't allowed to use anymore. |
Your a ST and this is your first sentence posting to mostly parents of children with SN? |
| You're is what I meant not your... |
The entire IEP process as it stands is bad for kids and teachers and families and schools. IEP law is federal- the DOE should be at a minimum assisting these schools in ways to create better systems to maximize funds within the constraints of those laws. Instead all they do is pass out money and fight legal battles and add requirements and paperwork that’s useless. It’s just not a sustainable system and you said yourself DOE is just a bank. We don’t need a bank, we need educators that can go in and assist schools and show them ways to consolidate and maximize funding. If federal law is prohibiting that then DOE should be fixing it. It’s been nearly the same IEP system for decades and I can tell you it’s only gotten harder to implement. Find someone that can make the system better, not just write a check. |