Taylor's new cabinet

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, Moran stays in a comparable role, and Hazel and Mamoon move up a level to report directly to Taylor.

This would seem to leave the following current staff without a position:

Diana Wyles
April Key
Stephanie Sheron
Peggy Pugh
Dana Edwards
Stephanie Williams

Where are they going?
Good riddance to many of these folks. God is good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, Moran stays in a comparable role, and Hazel and Mamoon move up a level to report directly to Taylor.

This would seem to leave the following current staff without a position:

Diana Wyles
April Key
Stephanie Sheron
Peggy Pugh
Dana Edwards
Stephanie Williams

Good riddance to many of these folks. God is good.

Where are they going?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, Moran stays in a comparable role, and Hazel and Mamoon move up a level to report directly to Taylor.

This would seem to leave the following current staff without a position:

Diana Wyles
April Key
Stephanie Sheron
Peggy Pugh
Dana Edwards
Stephanie Williams

So 75% of his cabinet replaced. Woah.

Took 6 months

[Anonymous]

Slippery Pete Moran always finds his way to the front of the line. Gotta give it to the guy, his grift game pays him a lot of money for disastrous results.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Slippery Pete Moran always finds his way to the front of the line. Gotta give it to the guy, his grift game pays him a lot of money for disastrous results.

Is he Taylor's look-a-like?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm honestly surprised that he has a Chief Equity Officer and continue to put our funding at risk.

Same

[Anonymous]

There are 2 white folks in his cabinet. Is the DEI officer there to make sure Taylor adds more representation for them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Slippery Pete Moran always finds his way to the front of the line. Gotta give it to the guy, his grift game pays him a lot of money for disastrous results.

I was wondering how long it would take for you to show up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if these appointments are effective July 1, or immediately?

July 1

Well, that is awkward. So now, for example, you have Niki Hazel reporting on up to Peggy Pugh until July 1, when Pugh will be out and Hazel will take over her role?

Pugh is retiring in June.

Is that because she didn't get the job? She has to leave.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are 2 white folks in his cabinet. Is the DEI officer there to make sure Taylor adds more representation for them?

How about people being qualified? Why is it that when so called diverse candidates earn jobs, they must be DEI hires? So in your mind, there is NO way diverse candidates can earn a job over white folks? Okay 🤔

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if these appointments are effective July 1, or immediately?

July 1

Well, that is awkward. So now, for example, you have Niki Hazel reporting on up to Peggy Pugh until July 1, when Pugh will be out and Hazel will take over her role?

Pugh is retiring in June.

This is for the best.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are 2 white folks in his cabinet. Is the DEI officer there to make sure Taylor adds more representation for them?

How about people being qualified? Why is it that when so called diverse candidates earn jobs, they must be DEI hires? So in your mind, there is NO way diverse candidates can earn a job over white folks? Okay 🤔

Unless they have DUIs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are 2 white folks in his cabinet. Is the DEI officer there to make sure Taylor adds more representation for them?

How about people being qualified? Why is it that when so called diverse candidates earn jobs, they must be DEI hires? So in your mind, there is NO way diverse candidates can earn a job over white folks? Okay 🤔

Unless they have DUIs.

Hummm, not sure what you are trying to relay here but okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hazel has been complicit in keeping many things opaque to the public and in the shading of information presented to the BOE, including speaking some outright untruths when asked questions, in her prior role. I'm disappointed, there.

Hazel is a mixed bag. I have received some direct outreach from her when I have asked a question, and that has been helpful. She generally seems underprepared for the BOE meetings - does not know her stuff at the appropriate level of detail to answer specific questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Slippery Pete Moran always finds his way to the front of the line. Gotta give it to the guy, his grift game pays him a lot of money for disastrous results.

Again with the throwing shade from this persistent poster, but no evidence to share. SMH