Kristen welken is so obsequious

[Anonymous]

Ah those Brits yes they do do that

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t say she’s obsequious, but she doesn’t push back hardly at all and when she does, it barely registers. I wish we had the type of bad-ass journalists the Brits have who are tenacious as a dog with a bone and don’t move on to the next question until they get an answer to the last one.

This.
Would also be good if the party out of power could demand as much accountability from the party in power as the MPs do in the British Parliament.

Maybe we should ask if they can take us back?

They don't want us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does obsequious mean.

In the tume it took you to type this, you could have looked it up.

What does tume mean. I took your advice this time but the internet doesn’t know.

[Anonymous]

She's terrible. One example of DEI which failed; otherwise, I am all for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's terrible. One example of DEI which failed; otherwise, I am all for it.

Meet the Press fired two people before her: Gregory and Todd. And they are white and male. I’d be surprised if she lasts much longer than they do. Even if she were a DEI hire, she’ll end up in the same place they did—gone—so it all evens out in the end.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does obsequious mean.

As my 5th glade teacher used to say " Look it up in your dictionary and your will increase your vocabulary.'

This is the politics forum where we apparently have to ask for definitions like we are in a spelling bee. Dear God.

NP. I mean, the fact that someone wouldn't know the meaning of "obsequious" is troubling. I guess you liberals really aren't the smartest people in the room.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does obsequious mean.

As my 5th glade teacher used to say " Look it up in your dictionary and your will increase your vocabulary.'

This is the politics forum where we apparently have to ask for definitions like we are in a spelling bee. Dear God.

NP. I mean, the fact that someone wouldn't know the meaning of "obsequious" is troubling. I guess you liberals really aren't the smartest people in the room.

and you are???

[Anonymous]

Agreed. Not a good fit for this program.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What does obsequious mean.

It’s a perfectly cromulent word

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's terrible. One example of DEI which failed; otherwise, I am all for it.

Meet the Press fired two people before her: Gregory and Todd. And they are white and male. I’d be surprised if she lasts much longer than they do. Even if she were a DEI hire, she’ll end up in the same place they did—gone—so it all evens out in the end.

It's a tough chair to fill following Tim Russert, who died too young at only 58.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does obsequious mean.

It’s a perfectly cromulent word

Hahaha. DP.

[Anonymous]

I had to stop listening, I can’t stand how she always says things like, “thank you for that FANTASTIC reporting.” She is too obsequious to the other correspondents. Can’t she just say, thank you? Her vocal urgency is grating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does obsequious mean.

As my 5th glade teacher used to say " Look it up in your dictionary and your will increase your vocabulary.'

This is the politics forum where we apparently have to ask for definitions like we are in a spelling bee. Dear God.

NP. I mean, the fact that someone wouldn't know the meaning of "obsequious" is troubling. I guess you liberals really aren't the smartest people in the room.

Liberals are educated and we know the meaning of lots of. 3-, 4- and even 5- syllable words!