OP, my Walls kid is a classic introvert. I don't know the algorithm that the school looks for in interviews but I know that my kid did not come off as the outgoing gregarious type in the interview. They did, however, talk about their academic interests which I think fit the profile of a Walls kid. They didn't do a lot of interview prep. The school sends out sample questions in advance but none exactly matched the questions in the interview. It may sound cheesy to say they should be themselves but that's all you can really do. |
There is no inconvenient truth here. College admissions have been strong. Lots of kids who are really happy with the college prospects they have after early admissions. You seem really negative on a school that you chose for your children. I also have a long history with the school and college admissions are great this year. I just don’t understand parents who are so down on the school. And I really doubt you know your junior’s cohort so well as you say you do. |
My kids is a senior; going through the college admissions process and hearing about the plans for the other kids is stunning. Merit scholarships in admission emails, trustee scholarships, full rides; I thought all of this came during the financial aid process. |
That's so exciting! Looking forward to hearing where these kids end up. |
I agree with all of these critiques except the college admissions statement. This year's seniors have early acceptances (that I know of, so this is a small fraction) at at least three t20s, Wisconsin-Madison with a full ride, and a bunch of impressive small colleges including Oberlin, Wellesley, and Swarthmore. Those are some pretty great schools, and lots more will come out of the woodworks in the coming weeks and once regular decisions come out in the spring. |
I'll give you Swarthmore, but Wisconsin, Oberlin, Wellesley? Come on, if you can pay full fare to the tune of more than 80K+, they're just not terribly difficult to crack these days. If you were talking about Ivies, Stanford, Amherst, Pomona, Univ of Chicago etc. for non-legacies and non-athletes, I'd be cheering for Walls this admissions season. The facts are undeniable: Bowser shamelessly dumbed down Walls admissions during the pandemic for political reasons, and embarrassing development for DC. |
Especially given one of these is a free ride it's entirely possible that the student wanted to go there. Not every kid wants to go to Harvard. I know lots of kids who could have been Ivy League who wanted to go to places like Michigan and Wisconsin for the experience, and others who did turn down Ivies because of full rides in state. College is a deeply individual choice. Anyways, Harvard Law admitted it's fewest number of black students since 1965 this past class. Legacy acceptances are through the roof. Scoffing at very good schools is a bizarre flex. |
Um, I also mentioned "at least three t20s." Maybe you didn't see that? |
Why should we believe you? |
Okay how about these- early admissions to Yale, UPenn, Brown, Dartmouth and Northwestern. No athletes, not legacies. Full rides to several other schools. A bunch of POSSE scholars. |
Why would they lie? Weirdo. |
POSSE scholars, good for them but UMC applicants are in a different category. |
Please stop arguing about individual college admissions. They’re totally unverifiable without violating the privacy of the students involved. And the kids are under enough pressure without adults gossiping about them on DCUM. |
What are you talking about? |
This is not helpful but given everything that is known about implicit bias I'm surprised SWWs still uses interviews and LORs vs essay tests like TJ |