These tiers are helpful for figuring out what colleges value the most. |
I would say that it applies for a competition open to all applicable people in the us (sport, academic, art, service, etc. based on qualifications like age or school years/HS) which is not based on public votes to win. examples: - all hs kids in the us can submit an art creation for x award…and after review by independent judges, kid wins. - all kids aged 13-19 can submit a video outlining their solution for x, and kid wins first place |
Oh man. I was top 10% of my ivy then HLS cum laude and I had no idea until today most of this stuff even existed. I feel bad now for kids today. |
| Those award "tiers" are fanfiction not how AOs evaluate. |
So how do AO's evaluate? |
|
Don’t stress about this.
My kid was accepted RD to an Ivy, T10 and multiple T20s with zero national awards. ECs showed dedication across years, but were fairly typical. Rigorous course load, uw 4.0, 5s all AP exams, 35 ACT (one sitting). |
There’s a good older post about that. They do give extra points (at some schools) for the highest tiers. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1224166.page |
|
These awards /EC tiers matter more for applicants who fall into one of these categories:
- something off about transcript or stats (test optional, a low grade in non-major field; slightly less rigor than others, etc); - oversubscribed majors (CS; engineering; business) - crowded top-tier field from your HS (competing with a lot of kids who look like you without much distinguishing) - kids with generally vanilla or otherwise non-remarkable EC/application narrative or story. |