
I would think that an "Plan" true believers would suspect Gray is part of the conspiracy and, hence, support one fringe candidate or another. Regardless, for a long time it's been clear that the most racially divisive individuals are anti-Gray and intent on scaring the crap out of White voters. |
Lot's of wacko theories have lots of supporters. A few years ago, there was this crazy idea that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. I was shocked that anyone believed such foolishness. There is another really crazy theory going around -- that any significant number of people support the DCPS status quo. I have never met such a person.I only hear about such people from those who think that anything less than 100% support for Rhee means you support the status quo. |
Here, let me remove my imperial wizard hood for just one second, and drop a little bit of knowledge on you. You'll have to go to Act II, though the whole show is definitely worth listening to: http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/350/human-resources The Plan actually quite a popular belief in the urban black community, and not particularly controversial. |
I've met plenty of folks in some crappy schools who thought DCPS could "do better" in some abstract way, but who were mostly happy with their school, and preferred the status quo over any kind of fundamental change. And when I say, fundamental change, I'm not talking about "Rhee-form", but anything beyond building improvements, etc... |
17:45 Your friends should talk to people with children in DCPS under Rhee! I will say no more. |
Interesting reflection. Personally, I was agnostic on Rhee until I saw how she bungled things with two schools which my daughter had attended and which didn't need to be fixed. If she hadn't meddled and made a mess of things, I don't know how I would feel about the election. |
NP here. I've heard that piece and know people who were interviewed for it, who felt that the producers twisted their words. I lost respect for Ira Glass after I heard that show. That said, I do think there are people out there who mistakenly believe in this conspiracy as if all white people are coordinating a carefully crafted plan to move black folks out. They're nuts of course. On the other hand, it can't be denied that gentrification is making it harder for working class people (primarily black) to stay in the city. So, as they say, "just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you." |
Right. So we should now start to GIVE these people more of our tax dollars to allow them to stay in the city? We should subsidize everything in this country. The neighborhood is getting better and wealthier and all of a sudden its the white person's fault. Look there are old white people in Ward 3 that can't keep up with the pace of prop taxes in their neighborhood as well. GET OVER IT. |
What's making it hard to stay in the city is that the city is becoming more attractive to middle- and upper-middle-class folks. Has nothing to do with black, white, etc... Displacement is obviously negative for those affected, but it's a naturally occurring phenomenon, not a plan. There's no intention behind it. Let's face it, the overwhelming number of long-term middle-class black residents *do* stay if they want to. Housing costs aren't an issue, because the overwhelming majority of middle-class are homeowners. But many choose not to. They cash out and move to the suburbs or out of the area (for instance, Atlanta has had a huge net migration from DC). There's a huge transfer of wealth from middle-class newcomers to emigrating middle-class oldtimers. The folks who've lost out are the urban poor, but for the most part, but there's no way that demand can be met by things like inclusionary zoning and other affordable housing schemes. There's just too much demand. DC does a heck of a lot better than the surrounding municipalities at providing housing for the very poor, but unless we're willing to say, "Freeze!" and decree that everyone living in DC currently gets to live here, and no one else may move in, displacement will continue apace. And, yes, PP we should give these people tax dollars to allow them to stay in the city--but to no more greater or lesser extent than any other regional municipality. One of the things that's been killing Washington, DC and urban cores in general is that we, as a society, have decided that cities are for poor people and suburbs are for folks with money. It just doesn't work. |
Maybe the full demand can't be met but that doesn't mean there shouldn't be a whole lot more of it. As far as I can see, it hasn't been effectively tried in DC. |
Hasn't been tried? What do you think DC's 30 year experiment in rent control has been? DC has by far the most stringent rent control laws of any local jurisdiction. And there is not a lack of affordable housing in DC. It just may not be in the neighborhood that you would prefer to live in. There are far too many renters (and tenant advocates) in DC who believe in the proposition that renters should have some inalienable right to live in the neighborhood of their choice at the price they want to pay for as long as they want. |
PP, rent control is not inclusionary zoning. Look it up and take a deep breath and think before you respond. |
There are people in this country and especially parts of this city that have been taught to expect everything in life from the government. It is a dangerous mentality and is ultimately leading us down the road to bankruptcy. The entitlement mentality of this city is astounding. People who believe they have some god given right to own a home, people who belive they should be given income and that they can have as many children as they want without any consequence. I believe that even many liberals would agree that the District is a perfect example of what happens when that entitlement mentality spreads through the government and is part of the fabric of the community. You get: unecessarily high taxes, high user fees, untamed budgets, high crime, low productivity, little to no entrepreneurship etc. When you take the basic competitive edge away from people they lose the drive to achieve and eventually succeed. Why should they? After all it will be given to them for free. Instead of a level playing field end the game all together and just make everyone celebrate second place. |
Not true. The charters are a larger portion of the public school population this year than they have ever been and they're continuing to grow. Last year they were up to 38% of all public school students and the demand still far outstrips the supply. And why wouldn't it? Charter academic scores continue to increase in opposition to those at DCPS. |
Is there a transcript somewhere of "the plan" or perhaps some kind of drawings in cave dwellings? Anything that doesn't involve having to listen to an entire radio show just to hear the remarks germane to this thread?
I really hate podcasts and audio files. I'm not a luddite, I just don't want to invest THAT MUCH TIME in something that's only going to be worth an eye roll. |