Ton of sit down interviews this week for Harris

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For all those so “worried” about Harris “avoiding” interviews, you’ll get hours of content to sift through this week:

Most of these are ass kissing coronation sessions from sycophants who didn't like her and didn't consider her presidential material from July 2020 to July 2024. You wouldn't even have known who the veep was because these very people didn't even think she was doing anything worthy enought to write a joke about during that time period. 60 Minutes interview needs to be uncut asking only the questions she doesn't want to answer and making her answer them. She has no real policies about anything, only soundbites, and she has changed her "opinion" on so many things. She was not nominated fairly so she's a proxy for Biden and, as such, needs to be made to defend that record as well, good and bad. Trump should have sat down and done the same but her interviews shouldn't be about Trump and real journalists know that. Voters can say they're neverTrumpers but candidates can't hide behind that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all those so “worried” about Harris “avoiding” interviews, you’ll get hours of content to sift through this week:

Most of these are ass kissing coronation sessions from sycophants who didn't like her and didn't consider her presidential material from July 2020 to July 2024. You wouldn't even have known who the veep was because these very people didn't even think she was doing anything worthy enought to write a joke about during that time period. 60 Minutes interview needs to be uncut asking only the questions she doesn't want to answer and making her answer them. She has no real policies about anything, only soundbites, and she has changed her "opinion" on so many things. She was not nominated fairly so she's a proxy for Biden and, as such, needs to be made to defend that record as well, good and bad. Trump should have sat down and done the same but her interviews shouldn't be about Trump and real journalists know that. Voters can say they're neverTrumpers but candidates can't hide behind that.

Really? So what additional policy detail would you have like to have heard, for example, in her border policy speeches? I thought she was very detailed. So what did you think was missing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all those so “worried” about Harris “avoiding” interviews, you’ll get hours of content to sift through this week:

Most of these are ass kissing coronation sessions from sycophants who didn't like her and didn't consider her presidential material from July 2020 to July 2024. You wouldn't even have known who the veep was because these very people didn't even think she was doing anything worthy enought to write a joke about during that time period. 60 Minutes interview needs to be uncut asking only the questions she doesn't want to answer and making her answer them. She has no real policies about anything, only soundbites, and she has changed her "opinion" on so many things. She was not nominated fairly so she's a proxy for Biden and, as such, needs to be made to defend that record as well, good and bad. Trump should have sat down and done the same but her interviews shouldn't be about Trump and real journalists know that. Voters can say they're neverTrumpers but candidates can't hide behind that.

translation: waah waah waah waah

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have huge issues with US policy in the Middle East. I have to say nevertheless that Harris has run a model campaign this time out. She’s accessible to a huge range of audiences. She was as good as anyone would dream to be against that maniac in the debate. Her polling is great. The dockworkers strike was averted. Maybe we can collectively let hope take over our psyches instead of abject terror, because the support is there and the desire to vote early or that day for her is -there- by any realistic view.

I voted the first day it was available in my state and the place was humming with voters. There is indeed a lot of momentum and happy voters supporting Harris. Enough of the GOP’s weirdo hellscape vision for America.

Although I cannot wait for the inevitable GOP talking point of “no, we don’t want her to give interviews like that, that’s not what we meant!! This doesn’t count.” Wait for it, you know it’s coming.

Yeah, what’s with the MAGA doom and gloom fixation? I have to wonder if they’re even living in the same universe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all those so “worried” about Harris “avoiding” interviews, you’ll get hours of content to sift through this week:

Most of these are ass kissing coronation sessions from sycophants who didn't like her and didn't consider her presidential material from July 2020 to July 2024. You wouldn't even have known who the veep was because these very people didn't even think she was doing anything worthy enought to write a joke about during that time period. 60 Minutes interview needs to be uncut asking only the questions she doesn't want to answer and making her answer them. She has no real policies about anything, only soundbites, and she has changed her "opinion" on so many things. She was not nominated fairly so she's a proxy for Biden and, as such, needs to be made to defend that record as well, good and bad. Trump should have sat down and done the same but her interviews shouldn't be about Trump and real journalists know that. Voters can say they're neverTrumpers but candidates can't hide behind that.

Her nomination was perfectly fair. The Consitution says nothing about primaries or political parties. The delegates met, they voted, she was nominated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For all those so “worried” about Harris “avoiding” interviews, you’ll get hours of content to sift through this week:

She recorded this hard-hitting interview like 2 days after Helene?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all those so “worried” about Harris “avoiding” interviews, you’ll get hours of content to sift through this week:

Most of these are ass kissing coronation sessions from sycophants who didn't like her and didn't consider her presidential material from July 2020 to July 2024. You wouldn't even have known who the veep was because these very people didn't even think she was doing anything worthy enought to write a joke about during that time period. 60 Minutes interview needs to be uncut asking only the questions she doesn't want to answer and making her answer them. She has no real policies about anything, only soundbites, and she has changed her "opinion" on so many things. She was not nominated fairly so she's a proxy for Biden and, as such, needs to be made to defend that record as well, good and bad. Trump should have sat down and done the same but her interviews shouldn't be about Trump and real journalists know that. Voters can say they're neverTrumpers but candidates can't hide behind that.

I guess anything beyond "they are eating the cats and dogs" is beyond comprehension.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"The work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by or a result of many things including our advocacy for what needs to happen in that region."

I love the interviews. More about “hey, I was a middle class kid,” and “opportunity economy.” Oh, and “joy!!”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For all those so “worried” about Harris “avoiding” interviews, you’ll get hours of content to sift through this week:

You’re actually bragging about Harris going on a podcast that is known for its discussions about sex? Interesting.

“For years, Call Her Daddy was synonymous with sex. It was known for raunchy talk and coining concepts like the "Gluck Gluck 9000" (an oral sex technique, FYI), keeping with the program's original "female locker-room talk" ethos.”
https://people.com/human-interest/all-about-alex-cooper/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have huge issues with US policy in the Middle East. I have to say nevertheless that Harris has run a model campaign this time out. She’s accessible to a huge range of audiences. She was as good as anyone would dream to be against that maniac in the debate. Her polling is great. The dockworkers strike was averted. Maybe we can collectively let hope take over our psyches instead of abject terror, because the support is there and the desire to vote early or that day for her is -there- by any realistic view.

I voted the first day it was available in my state and the place was humming with voters. There is indeed a lot of momentum and happy voters supporting Harris. Enough of the GOP’s weirdo hellscape vision for America.

Although I cannot wait for the inevitable GOP talking point of “no, we don’t want her to give interviews like that, that’s not what we meant!! This doesn’t count.” Wait for it, you know it’s coming.

Coming from the party who advocates for boys in the girls bathrooms, boys in girls sports, and the book Genderqueer in elementary schools.

Right? I do get a kick out of LWNJs calling the GOP platform a “weirdo hellscape.” That’s what we are currently living in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't wait for the right to proclaim "word salad'

This is indeed a word salad. But it figures that it impresses you.

"The work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by or a result of many things including our advocacy for what needs to happen in that region."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have huge issues with US policy in the Middle East. I have to say nevertheless that Harris has run a model campaign this time out. She’s accessible to a huge range of audiences. She was as good as anyone would dream to be against that maniac in the debate. Her polling is great. The dockworkers strike was averted. Maybe we can collectively let hope take over our psyches instead of abject terror, because the support is there and the desire to vote early or that day for her is -there- by any realistic view.

sure, sycophant. sure

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all those so “worried” about Harris “avoiding” interviews, you’ll get hours of content to sift through this week:

So when will she sit down with some real journalists who will ask her tough questions?

You mean like Trump who only calls Fox News from his bathroom? Double standards galore. Trump won’t even do the second debate he agreed to do with Biden. Bawk Bawk!

???


WATCH: Trump speaks at National Association of Black Journalists conference in Chicago

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-l...onference-in-chicago

He trashed them and then got up and left early. What a winner.

No, they trashed him and he called them on it.

Again, back to Harris and any tough interviews. Anyone? Anyone? Not even one?

Please answer without mentioning Trump.

+1000

[Anonymous]

“Ukraine, . . . is a country . . .

[Anonymous]

When is she going to remind us that what can be is unburdened by what has been? I miss that. Looks like her coaches have recommended against it going forward.