This. My DC went to Williams from a private school with a good track record, and the counselor didn't say it explicitly but always had a good feeling that DC would get in. |
He said there were other cliques besides athletes. The good news, sorta, is that the kind of person who won't belong in any of the cliques (unhooked UMC suburban) is very unlikely to get into Williams in the first place. |
| I think the NARP/athlete divide is less pronounced at both schools than it once was. That said, if it's a real concern, you might look more at SLACs outside the NESCAC, which is the most athlete-focused collection of SLACs. |
|
My kid liked Bowdoin but did not get in (no ED, because we had never visited in winter).
Why doesn’t your kid apply to both, and see where they get in, if they get any scholarships, and how they feel after Admitted Students Day (though know you can only ED one place). |
| If Williams is a feeder to Wall Street, consider the type of person who wants that career. Does your son want that pre-professional vibe or something more academic? Of course, both schools have great academics, but I’m talking about the vibe/culture. |
Someone with huge loans to pay off from attending Williams, lmao. |
|
I dont find Williams to be very pre-pro. Not in the way Wharton or even ND are.
I can't really explain why Wall Street has latched onto it, but .. it's been that way for a very long time. |
|
Williams is very cliquish and there is an athlete/non-athlete divide socially.
Bowdoin is less cliquish, but there are cliques based on one's athletic team. Academically, both are strong for a liberal arts education. If a student doesn't find his or her clique, both places can be lonely and isolated. These are small, isolated schools. For the right person, it can be a nice experience. |
Nice post, but I disagree with the two bolded portions. |
|
Williams is very cliquish and there is an athlete/non-athlete divide socially.
Bowdoin is less cliquish, but there are cliques based on one's athletic team. RE: Academically, both are strong for a liberal arts education. If a student doesn't find his or her clique, both places can be lonely and isolated. These are small, isolated schools. For the right person, it can be a nice experience. Would anyone know if the challenges are the same as above at Vassar — since small if you dont your group it can be lonely and isolated? |
|
Would anyone know if the challenges are the same as above at Vassar — since small if you dont your group it can be lonely and isolated?
What about Swarthmore? |
| I was worried about this "athlete/non" divide so often referenced about Williams before my kid went there, but it was by far her favorite school. I can say that she does not feel that divide or that the school is cliquish. Perhaps it is because she is very involved in the arts programs (which are quite robust at Williams), but she has made many friends - including athletes, who are also often involved in the arts. But if your son is having trouble deciding, I would recommend applying RD - especially to Williams, as ED will not give a boost in this case. |
| Of the Maine SLACs Bowdoin was my favorite but I preferred Williams. I’d also check out Pomona and Amherst. I preferred both of those schools to Bowdoin and Williams. |
|
Niece got into Bowdoin EC. No legacy, not an athlete (college wise), was full pay, not URM.
Had a great GPA, from top school in their city, rigor, years of service/sport commitment/EC's. Just a great all around kid. |
| At least reputationally, Bowdoin is known to emphasize personality and fit among applicants. Bowdoin wants friendly students (google the "Bowdoin Hello") who embrace both a liberal arts education and Bowdoin's "Maineness." While I'm sure Williams wants the similar general qualities, as someone mentioned previously, its minimalist application doesn't exactly allow applicants to showcase those qualities. |