Is this really true? I went to a T20 full need (and I think need blind, they are now, I don't remember) university without financial aid. By the beginning of my junior year, my Dad had cancer, my younger sibling was in college, and my sibling had been in a psychiatric hospital for over a year. My university stepped up and I got significant aid. |
|
I hadn't heard not to put SSN in order to signal full pay. We are full pay and my kids did not include SSN simply to avoid giving SSN where it is not needed.
Two JD family and we put employment. It is already obvious that we are full pay. |
If you really don't need aid, there's absolutely no reason to complete the SSN. That's a personal family decision, dictated by finances. No one can answer that one for you. I think your reasoning on occupation works for state flagships. Its naive for top tier schools. This is not how AO at selective privates think when they are looking for a "compelling" (not just a competitive) candidate. Your kid is not compelling if he's following in your footsteps and will be a hard story to sell at the AO table. At the end of the day, its about creating an interesting unique overarching compelling story. Yes, the kid has a depth of understanding. Yes, kid is a smart kid who knows what day to day engineering life looks like and where pay tops out. But that is not what gets you in to a selective college. At all. Again - this is only relevant at private T20/T30 for the most part. Everyone should get educated about how this REALLY works. And then make your own personal educated decisions. There's a ton of information out there if you are willing to read up and learn. |
That's not lying if kid has an interest in medicine and public health. Pre-med is not a major. Should never be put that down if Asian. Ever. It is disadvantageous in the review process. Again, its about the overarching creative narrative of the applicant. If you don't have a narrative that you are weaving through the application and are applying to T20, its hard to create a multi-dimensional compelling case for the kid. |
I agree, I heard the same podcast, and thought it was silly also. Take a look at who’s attending selective colleges. It’s the children of affluent professionals. Lots of attorneys, doctors, and executives in finance, real estate, insurance, Pharma, biomedicine, technology. It’s a plus. It’s fine. |
NP it's true and it's usually stated on websites. people for many years were not applying for FA for real admissions boost, paid full fare for one year and then applied and received FA for three years. those days are over. |
|
| I heard this podcast because you guys told me to listen. This guy is selling a lot of bullshit. |
This is an incredibly uncompelling argument. By the way, we’ve worked with four different college counselors, two at the different single sex privates our kids attend, and a different private counselor for each one, and none made this suggestion. |
interestingly some of the schools with the most affluent student populations (and some of the most expensive colleges) |
| The truth in our family is that both parents are retired. Seems to signal rich, no? |
I'm asking if it applies when there is a major change in circumstances? In my case, at the time I applied, we anticipated that I'd be full pay all 4 years. 2 major illnesses that came up within 6 months of each other changed that. My parents still paid in full my sophomore year, but when another college tuition was added they needed help. That's not gaming the system. |
Citation? |
The second added tuition was the most predictable circumstance |
Especially true not to complete the FAFSA for these schools .. since they take the CSS profile |