Who is actually calling the shots

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His advisors and council, which is public knowledge. It's okay to admit you have no understanding of the executive. None of this is new.

Interesting. Who elected his advisors and council?

The American people when they voted for Joe Biden.

Doesn’t quite work that way. It’s the firm of Klain, Ricchetti and Zients who are in charge.

Who now? You are making stuff up.

[Anonymous]

Why does it matter? All you need to know is its not who you voted for and that's not ok. End it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why does it matter? All you need to know is its not who you voted for and that's not ok. End it.

+1 yes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His advisors and council, which is public knowledge. It's okay to admit you have no understanding of the executive. None of this is new.

You have no shame and that is what’s wrong with Dems. Anything to protect the power you’d finagled for yourselves.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His advisors and council, which is public knowledge. It's okay to admit you have no understanding of the executive. None of this is new.

Advisors etc are supposed to serve the President and make it easier for him to make the best decisions, not make the decisions for him.

And as illustrated in living color debate night, Biden is not making decisions. A 10 day debate prep at an offsite location was to drill what the real people in charge have been doing into his head. It’s so obvious. People aren’t stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His advisors and council, which is public knowledge. It's okay to admit you have no understanding of the executive. None of this is new.

Interesting. Who elected his advisors and council?

The American people when they voted for Joe Biden.

Doesn’t quite work that way. It’s the firm of Klain, Ricchetti and Zients who are in charge.

Who now? You are making stuff up.

You think the chief of staff, the top political guy and the former chief of staff are made up. Interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His advisors and council, which is public knowledge. It's okay to admit you have no understanding of the executive. None of this is new.

Advisors etc are supposed to serve the President and make it easier for him to make the best decisions, not make the decisions for him.

And as illustrated in living color debate night, Biden is not making decisions. A 10 day debate prep at an offsite location was to drill what the real people in charge have been doing into his head. It’s so obvious. People aren’t stupid.

And why for that matter does a sitting president need to go offline for that long for debate prep? If he is supposedly engaging on these issues and making decisions on them every single day, surely the job itself should be sufficient prep?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His advisors and council, which is public knowledge. It's okay to admit you have no understanding of the executive. None of this is new.

Advisors etc are supposed to serve the President and make it easier for him to make the best decisions, not make the decisions for him.

And as illustrated in living color debate night, Biden is not making decisions. A 10 day debate prep at an offsite location was to drill what the real people in charge have been doing into his head. It’s so obvious. People aren’t stupid.

Yes they are lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s Obama’s third term and he wants a fourth.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His advisors and council, which is public knowledge. It's okay to admit you have no understanding of the executive. None of this is new.

Advisors etc are supposed to serve the President and make it easier for him to make the best decisions, not make the decisions for him.

And as illustrated in living color debate night, Biden is not making decisions. A 10 day debate prep at an offsite location was to drill what the real people in charge have been doing into his head. It’s so obvious. People aren’t stupid.

And why for that matter does a sitting president need to go offline for that long for debate prep? If he is supposedly engaging on these issues and making decisions on them every single day, surely the job itself should be sufficient prep?

100%

Biden didn’t have a prep, he had an immersion. He is not day to day on anything. And he never will be again, that’s over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His advisors and council, which is public knowledge. It's okay to admit you have no understanding of the executive. None of this is new.

Advisors etc are supposed to serve the President and make it easier for him to make the best decisions, not make the decisions for him.

And as illustrated in living color debate night, Biden is not making decisions. A 10 day debate prep at an offsite location was to drill what the real people in charge have been doing into his head. It’s so obvious. People aren’t stupid.

Yes they are lol

Democrats think tricking/lying to people in order to manipulate is hilarious. Aren’t they just so clever and superior to the peasantry? I don’t even know how they walk around talking about respect and tolerance and equality when they are the most odious creatures on earth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In the White House, who is actually making decisions on policy. Is it Jill? Is it Kamala? Is it Jeff Zients? Someone else?

Not a Biden supporter but I will admit that my family has done fine under him the past few years. I just feel that as a taxpaying American citizen I deserve to know who is actually making decisions in the White House.

Who is the man and/or woman behind the curtain?

The bigger question is who will control Trump in a second term? Putin? Project 25? Leonard Leo? A cabal of loyalists like Stephen Miller and Steve Bannon? The Saudis via their 2 billion investment in Jared's investment firm?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the White House, who is actually making decisions on policy. Is it Jill? Is it Kamala? Is it Jeff Zients? Someone else?

Not a Biden supporter but I will admit that my family has done fine under him the past few years. I just feel that as a taxpaying American citizen I deserve to know who is actually making decisions in the White House.

Who is the man and/or woman behind the curtain?

The bigger question is who will control Trump in a second term? Putin? Project 25? Leonard Leo? A cabal of loyalists like Stephen Miller and Steve Bannon? The Saudis via their 2 billion investment in Jared's investment firm?

No. At best that is the NEXT question. The question that matters now is who is currently running the show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the White House, who is actually making decisions on policy. Is it Jill? Is it Kamala? Is it Jeff Zients? Someone else?

Not a Biden supporter but I will admit that my family has done fine under him the past few years. I just feel that as a taxpaying American citizen I deserve to know who is actually making decisions in the White House.

Who is the man and/or woman behind the curtain?

The bigger question is who will control Trump in a second term? Putin? Project 25? Leonard Leo? A cabal of loyalists like Stephen Miller and Steve Bannon? The Saudis via their 2 billion investment in Jared's investment firm?

The biggest question is do you get paid hourly or salary for repetitively posting the same nonsense since 2016?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the White House, who is actually making decisions on policy. Is it Jill? Is it Kamala? Is it Jeff Zients? Someone else?

Not a Biden supporter but I will admit that my family has done fine under him the past few years. I just feel that as a taxpaying American citizen I deserve to know who is actually making decisions in the White House.

Who is the man and/or woman behind the curtain?

The bigger question is who will control Trump in a second term? Putin? Project 25? Leonard Leo? A cabal of loyalists like Stephen Miller and Steve Bannon? The Saudis via their 2 billion investment in Jared's investment firm?

The biggest question is do you get paid hourly or salary for repetitively posting the same nonsense since 2016?

No, but that's an interesting thought. Where should I apply? I need some extra spending money.