Students do study abroad and they have predicted numbers for that. |
In thinking about this: This seems so unfair to me. A student who loves the school enough to even accept spring start is less likely to get a new offer for a fall start over a student who was offered spring start and did not accept it. |
Only been through the process with one kid, with number two in another year, but NOTHING has led me to believe that anything about college admissions is "fair". |
I don't have any intel as to the real answer here, but W&M says that indicating interest in Spring Pathway does not affect potential waitlist offers, and from the parent Spring Pathway FB boards, several kids did get off the waitlist last year who had already committed to Spring Pathway. |
+1 All signs point to there being zero impact on WL offers based on whether or not you accept Spring Pathway. If they say it doesn't affect it, then they likely have a process where that information is kept separate from the formation of the WL ordering. |
The only way to know is to see how many were offered a fall spot who had committed to a spring start and how many got a fall admit who hadn’t. |
Whatever a school says about its admissions policy is auditable by accrediting body and by SCHEV. W&M never has a problem filling a class so there's no real benefit/pressure to maximize here--it would be a miniscule if any reward for a high risk. |
Spring on campus enrollment is lower largely due to study abroad programs. Spring enrollment enables them to fill available spots in housing and classrooms that would otherwise not be filled and get revenue from it without increasing capacity (beds, faculty). |