Yeah, but my understanding is that’s where the endowment is mostly a factor. Penn Law and Medicine have their own endowments that aren’t part of the $22BN. |
Exactly, and to qualify further following are top 5 colleges for undergrad teaching: - Amherst College - $1.68m / student - Swarthmore College - $1.65m / student - Williams College - $1.60m / student - Pomona College - $1.56m / student - Grinnell College - $1.4m / student Also, in US news above are in top 11, and also in other list ranking of best value, best undergrad teaching etc. |
The endowment of an LAC is going to be entirely or almost entirely focused on undergraduates. When you have a university, a large percentage of the endowment may belong to graduate programs (e.g. Harvard Business School) that do not have any undergraduates. |
They are part of the overall endowment. |
About 43% of UVA's endowment belongs to Medicine, Law, and Darden. Those schools don't have any undergraduate students. |
I wonder what is going to happen if these schools stop legacy admissions... |
By what ranking of undergrad teaching? |
Not PP, I guess PP might be referring to this: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-liberal-arts-colleges/undergraduate-teaching |
| Damn, the top 5 schools are rolling in $$$! |
|
Interesting how some of the recent upstart schools like NYU, BU, Northeastern, Tulane have bottom of the barrel endowments per student:
https://www.reachhighscholars.org/college_endowments.html Placing them above the top tier LACs in undergrad value is folderol. |
|
I went to a massive flagship, got a great education, and had a great experience. I felt like my school had a ton of resources but that students had make a bit of effort to find and obtain them.
My DC is now in one of the schools in the top 10 of endowment per student. My take is that it certainly makes a difference but only up to a certain point. Here are the advantages of having a massive endowment: * More generous financial aid: This is great if you need it. It also gives such schools an advantage in creating economic diversity. * Grants: E.g., getting paid by the school to do a non-profit internship, getting funding to travel abroad for the summer for an academic program, getting funding to do an expensive research or art project. * Hidden perks: Free laundry, book-and-supply credit, travel allowances, constant free food, etc. * Money for clubs: It's pretty easy for a student organization to get money from the school for whatever it is that they do. * More administrative support: This is usually but not always the case. I think the career counseling and advising services at wealthy schools are usually better than those less funded schools. All of this stuff is great, particularly if you're low income or middle class. But none of it is vitally necessary. I never felt like I was deprived of opportunities or resources in my own education (well, more advising would have been nice), but I'm also grateful that DC has them so readily available. |
You need to get it more. Endowments are a primary source of funds for ongoing operations and salaries at universities (operating expenses). |
This is gold! extend it to another 15 and consider their respective acceptance rates to get a list of top 20 colleges. |
| Disgusting that these rich colleges still charge a ridiculous amount. |
They give generous aid as well. Amherst, Grinnell and Williams are need blind. Where is the issue? |