Stronger than Wisconsin in literally one area of study (business, finance specifically). Yeah, just ignore the fact that most IU programs go unranked (like philosophy, mathematics, or chemistry) and just say it's equal to Wisconsin, who is Top 20 in everything. Just proving my point more. |
Stronger or equivalent in areas like public affairs (#1), music, english literature, foreign language, cognitive psychology, library science, etc. and yes, stronger in pretty much every sub-area of business including finance, entrepreneurship, analytics, information systems, accounting, marketing, management, etc. The US News Global University Rankings for Economics and Business, which look specifically at the quality of research produced, put Indiana at 25th worldwide, while Wisconsin comes in at #104. So yes, Indiana's economics program is also more than capable. But it's a bit unclear why you have a chip on your shoulder when almost every post in this thread has acknowledged that Wisconsin is higher-ranked overall. |
Um, music? |
Where are you drawing these rankings from IU Booster? I have a mission for you, just simply look up the US News economic rankings. UW Madison ranked 14th, while IU is ranked 40th. This holds across the board for most subjects. |
No worries, Wisconsin booster—I’ll help out since you seem to be having difficulty. It’s called US News & World Report. https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/economics-business |
IU Booster, US News Global is not a trusted site. They do not publish their methodology and are not considered reliable for global rankings. QS World, ARWU, and the Times Higher Education are the trustworthy sites for global rankings. All three have UW Madison higher than IU by hundreds of places, how it should be. That's because IU is an insignificant university, always has been always will be. |
As a hiring manager, I agree with the quoted text just above. I do not give Harvard CS grads any hiring or interviewing preference over VT or UMd or UVA or UMBC. Those Harvard grads really are not better qualified for any entry-level job I might have. That said, the Harvard grad might well have a better professional network that lets them know about some startup with good potential and the personal connection needed to get an interview at said startup. IMHO, the Stanford CS grad likely has the best “startup” network and the UCB CS grad or SJSU CS grad the next best “startup” networks (since SillyValley still has more startups than anywhere else). Mind, it plays out this way mainly because STEM fields are very much about skills and capabilities, and much less about branding or marketing (“prestige”). With other (i.e., non-STEM) fields the particular university attended might factor quite differently at hiring time; I would not know about that either way. |
So let me see if I've got this straight: US News & World Report ranking that supports your position = great! US News & World Report ranking that doesn't support your position = no good Sure thing, Wisconsin Booster!
Oh and BTW, the full global methodology is provided here: https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/methodology |
| yeah between these two schools, i would go with fit. |
| More important to look at whole school. It’s important to get a more rounded education and many students change majors |
+1 |
These rankings are equally if not even more useless, Wisconsin booster. It is clear you do not understand the methodology used in these meaningless global rankings. Wisconsin and Indiana are interchangeable. No need to stress over which one to attend. |
+1 Report the Wisconsin troll. |
| Take the Direct Admit. |
| Most department are ranked better at Wisconsin. This fact is seemingly ignored by both users on this thread. Anyone claiming IU is better than Econ is lying; ask any tenured professor or just looked at the faculty: Wisconsin got some pretty big names. |