"Your experience" is actually the very definition of an anecdote. N=1, as they say So yes tell me more about how the FDA and the BLS don't know how to study and track food prices. And your much more accurate vibes based info. |
And in fact we DO know how the numbers were obtained and processed: https://www.bls.gov/cpi/methods-overview.htm I'll await your detailed critique of their methodology. |
You save because you can't tell the future. What an idiotic statement |
One side of my family everyone lives to 90+, and most of the females live to 98+. So I'm going to assume there's a 50-75% chance I live to 95+. Better to be prepared. |
Damn those are some solid genes. One side my grandparents almost got to 90. The other they both died in late 70s. |
| Ours are only at half a million and we are our 50s. Only moved to the DC area recently, so only have a few years of DC area salaries to invest versus many decades of low salaries. |
| Depends on a myriad of factors including age, years to anticipated retirement, expenses, other assets, etc. My opinion is millenials may have this sentiment more since social security may or may not be an option at retirement age. I think any boomers (who are close to retirement) that has a milly and the current social security benefits is probably set. |
We plan to retire in 12 years at the ages of 60 and 62. At that time, our HHI will be approximately $800K. We expect to maintain the same or better lifestyle during retirement. Social security and pension will provide about $150K, leaving $650K. We’re retiring a few years early, so 3.5% withdrawal rate probably makes the most sense. This means we need about $18M in retirement. We currently have about $9.8M, so it seems like we’re pretty well on track. Having only $1M was never one of our goals. That’s – at best – a lower-middle class target in rural America. |
Unless you live in Flint or someplace, bottled water is worse for you than tap water— it’s just tap water with microplastics. Also the 4% rule is conservative— it was based on the worst markets ever. And it allows for annual increases with inflation so you don’t need to keep it flat for 10 years. Bogleheads have been tracking a mythical retirement of someone who started drawing down funds in the 2000 recession/crash and it’s worked out fine. |
You people are ridiculous |
That's false. US has low standard in determining quality of tap water. In many european countries, the US tap water would be not suitable for drinking. |
That's false too. 4% rule is there to minimize retirement income fluctuation and the risk of being wiped out. This is especially true if you only have one million dollars at the time of retirement. |
You really need to cite evidence if you are going to make up stuff up. Plus where do you think bottled water comes from? It has *fewer* quality requirements than tap water and sitting in plastic just makes it worse for you. |
Not sure what your point is here. Some people in the thread were suggesting the 4% rule is outdated and should be 3.5%, or should be 4% with no inflation adjustment and my point was it has been back tested thru some pretty bad market conditions (although IIRC the 4% assumes a decent chunk of bonds in retirement). |
|
It's feels small because it took forever, doesn't buy a house anymore, was achieved with match and high fees. Many people don't have the experience to get to the same amount on their own. Had just done the match and invested the rest on their own, they would probably have a lot more money.
I would not be thankful my job pushing me into such crap. |