This question comes up all the time. If this is really how college feel, that seems a$$-backwards, but maybe it’s true. |
| Any suggestions for an incoming middle school student? Anything that you’d do differently? |
It is how they feel which is why many MCPS principals don’t allow WL in 6th grade and even remind parents that their kid will still need 3 years in Hs. btw those level 4/5’s will be combined classes in HS anyway because there isn’t the staffing allocation for such small classes. |
Calc in 8th? How can my kid get on that track? WPES only offers Alg 1 in 5th. |
I reiterate that is is a$$-backwards for two reasons: 1) the sooner you start a language the better as far as developing fluency and a good ear for it. 2) there aren’t a lot of great classes to take in MS but there are lots of great classes in HS. So you are essentially trading something like AP Econ as an extra HS elective something like 6th grade art. I’m not disagreeing with your assertion—but it’s sad that the college AOs take this approach, as it’s really dumb. My younger kid took Spanish 1-2 in MS, and is taking 3 now. He’d like to drop so he can double up on science classes, but everyone is saying that he could only drop after 3 if he started in 9th grade with 1. It’s just silly. |
|
My freshman is taking Hon Spanish 4 now. It's a lot of work; probably the first time since the very beginning that he has to work hard in a language class. He'll go in sequence and probably do both APs in junior and senior year respectively.
Btw if you really want to understand languages and the college admissions process, you should do a search of the college forum here - it gets discussed regularly. You can also check the common data set for individual schools (just google, most have it posted on their website.) Many kids don't do all 4 years, but it's also true that many schools (especially very competitive ones) want to see 4 years in HS of language and highest rigor. Mileage definitely varies, and kids with specialized talents elsewhere seem to do fine. But the bottom line that I've absorbed from reading here as well as having 1 kid go thru the admissions process - it's better to do 4 years in HS if your kid can manage it. |
|
OP here. Thank you for your advice. I now understand the reasoning behind 4 years of language. She can do Spanish 4, 5, AP Spanish, and AP Spanish Lit, then. To a PP who asked why a language in middle school, it's because this kid gets impatient. She needs a challenge. We are bilingual in another language she takes outside of MCPS in a weekend school, and she took Algebra 1 in grade 6 - which shouldn't be a problem at her high school, they have stuff beyond AP Calc BC. But middle school promised to be a miserable experience without those accommodations. I am glad she is now going into high school, and will have the opportunity to knock herself out with APs. |
No, it's not. Mine did just that (AP language in 10th grade, then chose other rigorous coursework in areas of deeper personal interest beyond that) and had excellent college admissions outcome at very competitive schools. Several of his peers made the same decision and also had very positive college acceptance outcomes. |
That was a thought experiment, based on a very advanced student. |
This always baffled me. Why do colleges do this! |
| College counselors will tell you that kids need to take 4 years of FL in HS. Especially true for non STEM kids. Pushing too fast in MS just makes things harder in HS. |