This is a tidbit to remember, OP. If using the internet to gauge admission experiences the location matters. The sad reality is that any given kids first admission hurdle is their same school peers. Kids from communities that don’t offer the same degree of rigor as MCPS schools are like comparing apples and oranges. |
Yes, MCPS has Naviance. Shows scattergrams of where kids at your kid’s school got in and didn’t. Better for narrowing list of reaches and targets than predicting whether your kid will get in a specific place because it does not/cannot reflect things like rigor, hooks, ECs, whether someone applied ED, etc. Parents have their own access to Naviance through kid’s school but don’t remember when access starts. |
YCBK podcast is the best of all.
As far as books: Valedictorians at the Gates Soundbite Who Gets In and Why and, since you are not familiar with the US college process: What Colleges Don't Tell You (And Other Parents Don't Want You to Know): 272 Secrets for Getting Your Kid into the Top Schools. This book is insane and dated, but it gives some insight into how a certain segment of parents start resume-building, courseload-designing, and activity-focusing while their child is still in middle school. I don't recommend follow the author's advice; instead, consider the book a sociology textbook. |
Your dc is doing really well and is setting himself up for success. Just remember that there are others who have the same profile and getting into some of the very elite schools is like winning the lottery as they receive applications from so many qualified students.
Also remember that your student will have intellectual peers regardless of where he attends. He doesn’t need to go to an Ivy League school for that. In terms of affordability, if you won’t qualify for financial aid based on need, find some schools that he likes that provide a lot of merit to outstanding students. These include state schools like Alabama and some lesser-ranked LAC’s. If he has admission to one of those that is affordable, he can also apply to more selective schools (as long as he would be happy at one of the schools where it is easier to obtain admission). I know many people who have “chased merit” for financial reasons and it has worked out post-graduation with good grad school placement or a good job. |
+1. His explanation of "buyer" and "seller" colleges is really helpful. Along with the understanding of how difficult it is to get into elite schools. |
So many DCUMers are in denial about the truths behind what Selingo's book uncovered. |
And what are they? |
You can fake that crap. Admissions officers aren't calling to verify the clubs you were in or whether you actually went on that mission trip to circumcise babies in Haiti. Focus on grades and scores. |
All MCPS schools have Naviance. The scattergrams are unfortunately not all that accurate in test optional environment. The bar charts will give you an idea of how few kids get into some schools though. Another good read to set expectations is “Never Enough” by Jennifer Wallace. College admissions is brutal. You would find my kids results depressing for sure. |
Admissions decisions are often based most on the needs/institutional priorities of a school. |
This - faculty kids, legacy, donors, athletes. other lesson: schools are still being wowed by bullshit ie the elephant whisperer ie the girl who went on the one-week paid trip to an elephant sanctuary in Thailand. it's a lot of bullshit out there. |
Keep on believing that. https://www.ivycoach.com/the-ivy-coach-blog/college-admissions/the-smell-of-privilege-in-admissions/ |
it was just one example from sellingo's book. the ad com was wowed. the applicant obv didn't say this was a one week teen tour, she just said she was a licensed [whatever the word for elephant whisperer] and left it at that. same ad com was only suspect of the working class applicant who worked 25 hours a week. they weren't sure that was possible. wtf? |
Yep. The two legacies bumped my kid who had a much higher gpa, scores (kids know each other) and even 'better' ECs. Nothing you can do about that part. |
DP: Yes, I was also annoyed by that exchange in his book. However, the PP is correct that admissions have shifted and now the elephant whisper is considered an achievement solely based on privilege and therefore doesn't come from a place of caring/passion and has little impact. |