But they're not avoiding taxes. They're only deferring taxes on the 403 and 457 contributions, and they'll be subject to RMDs. |
Why? It minimizes taxes and encourages saving for retirement in the most tax advantaged way. |
If they plan to retire early, RMDs with higher tax rates may not be an issue. |
OP didn't do an analysis that took into account when they plan to retire or what their post retirement income will be, so there's no way to conclude that they're either saving in the most tax advantaged way or minimizing taxes over their lifetime. And I doubt they're wealthy ebough to retire all that early. |
They did —they simultaneously raised the amount of the standard deduction. And judging by the number of folks who are saying they now take the standard deduction, it worked. |
| 90% use the standard deduction in addition to whatever tax credits they may be eligible. (Earned income, child, teacher expenses, etc6 |
This idea is not dumb. However there is a saying about letting the tax tail wag the dog. If keeping your accounts simple increases your taxes by a bit, it could be worth it. Depending on your overall wealth at retirement, you may find it was better to pay 22% tax to contribute to a Roth. There are so many factors, but you are thinking about this properly overall. There is no one right answer. Save 15-20% of your income in some way, shape or form. There are benefits and drawbacks to every decision. Endless analysis is not helpful but your idea is not dumb. |
I don't see how they are going to retire early if their joint income is so close to $123,500 that they are making decisions about whether to max out a 403b and/or 457b or put money in a Roth IRA. If that were my income, I would be putting every dollar I could in tax-deferred vehicles and reducing my overall tax burden since putting wage income into tax-deferred retirement vehicles reduces your other taxes as well (state taxes, FICA, etc.) I think Medicare is the only one that comes out pre-tax no matter what. |
You are vastly overthinking this. As other have pointed out, your tax burden if you make $123,501 is 22 cents higher than if it is $123,500. There is no advantage or disadvantage to being in one side or the other of a marginal tax rate cutoff. |