Yes, but not that much. I am still wondering if it's really the case that people will do this or is it a myth? I get why Ivies matter to many people, but at the same time I don't get it. Like, there are many other ways to achieve status and success that don't involve the indignity of competing and jockeying for a leg up in all sorts of embarrassing ways. To each their own! I'm glad it's not something I obsess about or want for my kid. I'm ok if that makes us a bit inferior in the eyes of some people. |
I can't help but laugh at this and the other post. How do you know someone went to MIT? Seriously, all the schools are good. MIT isn't special and I wasn't special to get in. (But don't forget I went to MIT!) |
DH went to MIT. in addition to the very true lottery points above, you have to understand MIT’s curriculum. The required first year classes are very hard. They don’t take people who don’t have a reasonable chance of getting through them, which means kids who are exceptionally well prepped and smart. |
Thanks everyone for your inputs. But I didn’t see one response where it stated that one of the top schools like MIT has taken a Langley student on academic merit only. Should I assume it never happened ? |
Maybe you should call MIT admissions and ask them yourself, OP. |
Look at the Naviance data.
|
almost never |
+1. Pure academics is unlikely to be enough. Same concept applies to most top schools - need top academics AND some differentiator. And also please read the posts about MIT being a lottery. Btw, CalTech is a nearly identical lottery. |
One poster, posing as two, was at MIT for sure, but it was at Manasas Illusion Therapy, a mental health institute. Has grudge against Langley, and posts this garbage |
same poster from Manasas Illusion Therapy, a mental health institute. Has grudge against Langley, and thinks studying is prepping |
Both sound credible to me whereas your post not so much |
+1 |