Travis Barker family emergency

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:good god I am the polar opposite of people like this. so dramatic and personal/why share/gross.

It’s because they are narcissists.

[Anonymous]

The last time he pulled this drama move it turned out he had bad diarrhea. He had to get medically hydrated. Super important to send out mysterious tweets though. Because the world cares about his diarrhea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing Kourtney went into labor. She’s huge and probably lied about her due date to prevent a media circus. I bet she’s 36 weeks at least.

When has a Kardashian sought to avoid a media circus? Also she isn’t Beyonce or Brangelina having their first kid there isn’t that much interest in her having her fourth and he having his 3rd kid where she needs to obscure her due date.

[Anonymous]

Maybe he is religious and is seeking prayers. Whatever happened, don’t judge someone especially when it might be very serious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe he is religious and is seeking prayers. Whatever happened, don’t judge someone especially when it might be very serious.

If I have something very serious going on or a family emergency, I don't have the time or inclination to post on social media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing Kourtney went into labor. She’s huge and probably lied about her due date to prevent a media circus. I bet she’s 36 weeks at least.

They announced in June and she didn’t look anywhere close to 6 months pregnant. So no, I don’t believe her due date is in September at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She posted last week “one month.”

She’s 36 or 37 weeks by now. Practically full term.

36 weeks is still early to go into labor. It’s not an emergency, emergency, but outcomes are meaningfully worse than full term. The median 36 weeker ends up in the NICU. If it’s a boy and/or they don’t get lung shots in in time, odds of a substantial NICU stay go up substantially. We’ve all gotten super used to modern medicine saving premises, but many of those kids have substantial complications… and 60 years ago the President’s baby was dying from prematurity at 35 weeks. It’s not no big deal to be a month early.

This is way over-exaggerated. 36 weekers do not have “meaningfully worse outcomes”, or “substantial complications” just by virtue of being born at 36 weeks. I had 2 36 weekers 11 years ago and it was no big deal, the doctors were not concerned in the least before my delivery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She posted last week “one month.”

She’s 36 or 37 weeks by now. Practically full term.

36 weeks is still early to go into labor. It’s not an emergency, emergency, but outcomes are meaningfully worse than full term. The median 36 weeker ends up in the NICU. If it’s a boy and/or they don’t get lung shots in in time, odds of a substantial NICU stay go up substantially. We’ve all gotten super used to modern medicine saving premises, but many of those kids have substantial complications… and 60 years ago the President’s baby was dying from prematurity at 35 weeks. It’s not no big deal to be a month early.

This is way over-exaggerated. 36 weekers do not have “meaningfully worse outcomes”, or “substantial complications” just by virtue of being born at 36 weeks. I had 2 36 weekers 11 years ago and it was no big deal, the doctors were not concerned in the least before my delivery.

NP. I was told that if I had another baby I would need a c-section at 36 weeks because of possible complications for me and the baby. So the doctors clearly found that to be an acceptable threshold of gestation.

[Anonymous]

Does anyone do anything anymore without broadcasting it on social media?

[Anonymous]

Any updates? This has to be about the baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Any updates? This has to be about the baby.

Not yet.

I’m guessing tomorrow they’ll release something.

I bet this is all for the show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She posted last week “one month.”

She’s 36 or 37 weeks by now. Practically full term.

36 weeks is still early to go into labor. It’s not an emergency, emergency, but outcomes are meaningfully worse than full term. The median 36 weeker ends up in the NICU. If it’s a boy and/or they don’t get lung shots in in time, odds of a substantial NICU stay go up substantially. We’ve all gotten super used to modern medicine saving premises, but many of those kids have substantial complications… and 60 years ago the President’s baby was dying from prematurity at 35 weeks. It’s not no big deal to be a month early.

This is way over-exaggerated. 36 weekers do not have “meaningfully worse outcomes”, or “substantial complications” just by virtue of being born at 36 weeks. I had 2 36 weekers 11 years ago and it was no big deal, the doctors were not concerned in the least before my delivery.

NP. I was told that if I had another baby I would need a c-section at 36 weeks because of possible complications for me and the baby. So the doctors clearly found that to be an acceptable threshold of gestation.

36 weeks is just days from full-term. Both my kids were born right around then (one a few days past 36 weeks, one a day before). Absolutely no intervention needed during labor or after. They didn't even consider it pre-term at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She posted last week “one month.”

She’s 36 or 37 weeks by now. Practically full term.

36 weeks is still early to go into labor. It’s not an emergency, emergency, but outcomes are meaningfully worse than full term. The median 36 weeker ends up in the NICU. If it’s a boy and/or they don’t get lung shots in in time, odds of a substantial NICU stay go up substantially. We’ve all gotten super used to modern medicine saving premises, but many of those kids have substantial complications… and 60 years ago the President’s baby was dying from prematurity at 35 weeks. It’s not no big deal to be a month early.

This is way over-exaggerated. 36 weekers do not have “meaningfully worse outcomes”, or “substantial complications” just by virtue of being born at 36 weeks. I had 2 36 weekers 11 years ago and it was no big deal, the doctors were not concerned in the least before my delivery.

NP. I was told that if I had another baby I would need a c-section at 36 weeks because of possible complications for me and the baby. So the doctors clearly found that to be an acceptable threshold of gestation.

36 weeks is just days from full-term. Both my kids were born right around then (one a few days past 36 weeks, one a day before). Absolutely no intervention needed during labor or after. They didn't even consider it pre-term at all.

It depends on if the baby was a boy or a girl. Usually boys would need the steroid shots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She posted last week “one month.”

She’s 36 or 37 weeks by now. Practically full term.

36 weeks is still early to go into labor. It’s not an emergency, emergency, but outcomes are meaningfully worse than full term. The median 36 weeker ends up in the NICU. If it’s a boy and/or they don’t get lung shots in in time, odds of a substantial NICU stay go up substantially. We’ve all gotten super used to modern medicine saving premises, but many of those kids have substantial complications… and 60 years ago the President’s baby was dying from prematurity at 35 weeks. It’s not no big deal to be a month early.

I had a 33.5 week birth and the docs said no special shots for the lungs at that point -- I asked.

We had shots for respiratory function at 36 wks. It’s happens

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Any updates? This has to be about the baby.

Shana Moakler said that all the kids were okay so it’s not them.