Yeah, there are some posters here who chime in as though you’re an idiot for not going the hormone route. |
I’m the PP who mocked the response and will do so forever. Please cite chapter and verse in the Dominus article in the NUT extolling Premarin specifically. You cannot, because it isn’t there. Learn. to. read. As much or more to the point, I sure do hope you and the other daft little things here consume absolutely no dairy if forced animal pregnancy troubles you, and that you consider those in the horse world are far more likely than those outside of it to be guilty of any form of equine abuse. |
Sure, Jan. Are you a medical researcher? |
Because you are. Because statistically, the risk presented to most women by heart disease so vastly exceeds the risk of breast cancer across the population that advising based on a false risk to the average woman is steeped in bad science and lies. Who is saying that woman with any form of BC must be on hormonal medication? No one. |
I found the blaming of doctors to be too much. There are risks of hormone therapy and despite going through the risks with patients, if we prescribe them and they get breast cancer or have a stroke then they will look at doctors and say how could you have prescribed this? It’s a delicate balance and doctors aren’t all evil and trying to withhold treatment - it is just that this treatment does have risks and needs to be carefully prescribed and some doctors don’t feel comfortable giving something out that may cause harm. |
What are you talking about? Name the time stamps of posters that are implying women are idiots for not using HRT. We’ll wait. |
This is the actual truth. The other responses are just noise. |
You literally do not understand the basis for the article nor the appropriate use of the word “misled” in the piece. Because of the age spreads in the original WHI analysis, the vast majority of women across one if not two generations - women who were NEVER at risk from using HRT (women 5 years within full meno without certain risks) were counseled against taking safe for them medications that could have vastly improved their lives AND protected against heart disease, certain cancers, and osteoporosis— ALL of which present much greater risk to most women than breast cancer. |
Someone's still getting her period. |
I love your misogyny! You require zero pills to be as ugly as you are, so kudos. Someone’s big mad that other women can advocate for themselves and their health with actual physicians in a slightly improved culture discussing the real impact these symptoms can have on our lives. |
Can you explain? What is the process, and what do you see as the ethical issues? |
The context would still be missing, unless PP can also produce an actual cite for stats showing the percent of prescriptions of estradiol or estrogen that include Premarin and not something else. |
I'm the DCIS poster. I would love to take hormones but can't (I'm on tamoxifen). Hearing about all the great things HRT does was depressing to me. I am more worried about osteoporosis than breast cancer so I'm running and weight training but I wish the fact that some women just can't take HRT wasn't ignored. There are a lot of us. |
Wait, what?!? |
Who cares. |