| How much was the ticket OP? |
Just wanted to say NOT TO FOLLOW THIS ADVICE if the emergency is a stroke. |
I do not think a judge is going to make a decision on the medical urgency of a particular hospital or doctor visit. I think they would be choosing to excuse something that was justifiably a one time event. Vs. if I was just speeding along the route I take my kid to school, that just means I am likely doing that habitually. |
Lol. Women can be in labor for 24 hours. This is a load of crap. |
You are saying that people having strokes should drive themselves to the hospital? |
| Speeding is against the law because are a danger to yourself and others on the road when you speed. Especially if you are medically compromised as you are describing. I don’t see any way you would not pay your ticket. |
I agree. Not all pregnancies require urgency or emergency care. A small handful might. The point is that there are no infections that the patient can still drive themselves to the hospital/ER that are serious enough to warrant speeding to the hospital. I don't think either truly justifies any leniency, but I can see a judge possibly being swayed by the pregnancy. There is zero justifications for leniency in OP's case. |
Ideally someone else would drive them but don’t wait for an ambulance to arrive. Go straight to the hospital. That said maybe the guidance has changed and ambulances are better equipped to handle suspected stroke caaes |
|
Here is the thing. Just pay the fine and move on. It's not expensive and doesn't affect your insurance and driving record.
If you are in Maryland, speed camera tickets are $40. You won't get points on your license and this is usually not reported to insurance providers. Here are your options: 1- Pay the fines. You admit you are guilty. 2- Plead guilty with explanation and hope for a reduced fine. You would still be considered guilty. If the judge empathize with your situation and cut the fine in half. You pay $20 instead of $40. Is that worth it to you? 3- Plead not guilty and request a trial. This is the only way to get it totally off all of your records. First of all, you won't win this case with your explanation about speeding to the ER. This would be an admission of speeding. At best it you would get a reduced fine with that explanation but still be guilty of speeding. To beat this speeding ticket, you would a defense like: - a camera error - another person was driving your car at the time - picture isn't conclusive, there may be other on the image - speed signs in the area were obstructed, so you couldn’t know the speed limit - proper procedures weren't followed Just pay the fines and move on. |
| Is this in DC? DH got a speeding ticket on his way to the hospital after I had just given birth. He contested it and said he was in a hurry to bring our toddler to the hospital to see the new baby and they forgave the ticket. This was many years ago and it was a write-in process as opposed to appearing in person, so it was worth a shot! |
|
If I were the judge I would not have much sympathy for the "severe infection" excuse. To justify speeding and putting others lives at risk it better be an acute problem (i.e. severe wound, you are literally about to give birth...).
|
Time is brain. You don't want for the ambulance, you get the patient in the closest car and drive as fast as possible to the nearest hospital and deal with the tickets later. |
|
What jurisdiction gives tickets for 41/30? Most cameras you don’t even get a ticket until you’re 12mph over. So your ticket would say 42/30.
I would pay it personally. It’s either time or money your giving up. |
Okay, but the person HAVING the stroke should not drive themselves to the hospital. |
Sounds reasonable, I would try this. Good luck OP! 👍🏽 |