I don't really need to justify my stock rubric and feedback forms, but yes, I am at a large state school. In my writing classes, students are given several shots at drafts ( with extensive, personal, and specific review from me) before they turn in a final draft. By the final draft, they either know what they did wrong/right or they don't, and the rubric indicates clearly these areas. And for final essays, like end of the semester essays, yeah...I am not going to spend hours on specific commenting when grades are due in the tightest of timelines. I choose to give them the most time to finish the essay, which means they are due at the final exam period. That's a gift. If this is an upper level class, it is presumed they know how to write and the stock responses tell them why their grade is what it is, in a clear and detailed rubric. Then personal comments, one or two, are added about the actual content of the essay..usually one or two praises and one room for improvement. Sorry if this means I should retire to you. |
| Exhibit 1 for why those in the know choose small liberal arts colleges. |
| Cool story |
| Does this mean professors are going to be replaced by chat gpt? |
| I would have assumed the professor was being sarcastic. If he was actually going to use AI, why would he tell them. I think, as another poster mentioned, it was a dig at suspecting students used AI. |
| Did ChadGPT write this thread? |
LOL ! The prof is probably seeking reactions. No sane or reasonable professor would make such an announcement; this prof made the statement in order to gauge the responses. |
And the head of that particular academic department is already aware of the experiment. |
OP here. Update. No, this isn’t an experiment. This appears to be a case of an overwhelmed professor who might be on the spectrum and says (in his latest email to students) that he has ADHD. He apparently said the same thing in one of his other classes and a parent posted about it in a parent group on FB. Similar to this thread, only from a different parent and involving a different class of his. I advised my child to alert the adviser and director of undergraduate education for the program but am not going to involve myself. Professor emailed students again last night and said he got permission to submit grades late — by 8 am today — and told them to all email him their preferences on using chatgpt for feedback (!?!?$), so that part of it had changed. He also said they all needed to get up between 6 and 7 am to check that their grades were accurate before he formally submitted them. So basically he invited like 60 new emails before he can submit grades in *checks watch* 53 minutes. My child tells me this same professor always came to class unprepared, saying he hadn’t completed his slides for the lecture and instead they would read from the textbook, each student reading one sentence at a time. Anyway, department heads are involved now. University brass might be too given the FB thread. |
This is great news since DS can get ChatGPT to read analyze his essay and suggest ways to improve it up front. |
This professor deserves a promotion for showing his creativity. ChatGPT is an excellent tool that students and faculty should use to improve their work. |
This prof definitely needs a review, but the level of parental involvement/engagement/interest here in a college aged child's coursework is off the rails. The students should be handling this. That there is a parent group here blows my effing mind. |
OP here. My kid asked for advice. I gave it. 🤷♀️ The parent groups of students on FB *are* loony. I was in one for about a week and quit because of the helicoptering. |
| I don't get why the professor came out and said he was going to use Chatgpt. There was really no point to announce that. |
But what reason would he have for stating it? I'm a teacher and I take plenty of short cuts as well, but I don't announce them in an email to families. |