I asked the same question in a thread recently.
According to a parent, they (the parents) wanted to drop the moniker since they accepted a lot of siblings that were, as someone pointed out, less talented. Hard to say if this waters down the brand or not. We loved our tour there, but we weren’t going to fork out that tuition times two. Funding our savings at a higher level made more sense to us… |
Looking at their Mission and Philosophy, it might have to do with branding. The "for the Gifted" in the name is very striking and intimidating, even when you have a gifted child. Focusing on a differentiated, joyful education, especially nowadays, is much more appealing. |
Well we know you weren't the top of the class. |
...Well, kind of. They want 120 in at least one subcategory. That certainly widens the pool a fair bit. "Copy of intellectual test report is required for admission to grades 1-8. Applicants must have a qualifying score of “Superior” or “Very Superior” (120 or higher) in at least one test sub-category for admission." |
No, though I wasn't sad to see that kid leave the school, that's for sure. |
Nysmith family here - they did some survey and the parents overwhelmingly disliked having it in the name - or so they told us. I mean I certainly wasn’t walking around announcing my kids were at nysmith school for the gifted. A joy filled education is a lot … not sure why it needs a slogan? |
The “joy-filled education” is laughable. Neither of my kids who went there describe it as such. |
But then it no longer actually serves the very small group it was formed to serve. The problem lies in that most people in DMV do not actually have a "gifted" child (of the number who do, who want to pay private school the number gets even smaller) in that they have an IQ above 150 cut off was and do not know that actually "gifted" students need a different pace and way of teaching than any of the other privates in this area provide. Particularly in younger years up to HS. I think the school suffered from a lack of ability to get enough students that met the qualifying attributes when it originally opened, when it was trying to stay true to the original intent, then because of financial needs started admitting high achieving but not truly gifted students in, and now know they should not market themselves as something they are not. Most high achieving students at the "big 3" schools are not "gifted" they are very bright and work very hard--not the same thing at all. I have a child like this at a "big 3" and have seen the difference between these sorts of kids and those who are actually gifted, and obviously so, at young ages. sorry for typos |
Then they have changed things significantly since we toured years ago for my oldest who scored above 145 and they said the cut off then was something like 140? If they dropped it to 120 then, yes, they should remove that "gifted" label. |
It is no longer a school for gifted students. You can get in pretty much if you interview well. It is extremely expensive and you’re basically just paying for a very low student teacher ratio. The school is riddled with issues, and they all stem from the top. LOTS of their best teachers left this year. |
The average kids live in Loudoun and Frederick. |
And a lot of them go to nysmith ![]() |
How does this have anything to do with diversity? All genders/races/socioeconomics can have IQ’s over 120. |
Holy insult Batman. There are tons of diverse candidates with IQs over 120. |
Wouldn’t most kids who are a bit above average (by which I mean IQ around 110) have a sub-category in which they score 120? |