Another corrupt conservative Supreme Court Justice

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Roberts’ 2000 adoption of Irish twins (literally), at a time when international adoption of them was illegal?

Get real. While I generally do not agree with Justice Roberts' legal opinions and perspectives, I certainly consider his adoption of 2 children a good thing. No doubt, those children are lucky to have the Roberts as parents.

That isn’t the point though. Was the adoption done legally is the question

Personally I don't need Justices to have been pure as the driven snow for their entire lives. I could be convinced otherwise, but I think Roberts is personally honest. I think it's important to acknowledge that. Otherwise, the truly corrupt like Thomas and, it's looking like Gorsuch, can hide behind the idea that their political opponents are just crying "wolf."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Roberts’ 2000 adoption of Irish twins (literally), at a time when international adoption of them was illegal?

Get real. While I generally do not agree with Justice Roberts' legal opinions and perspectives, I certainly consider his adoption of 2 children a good thing. No doubt, those children are lucky to have the Roberts as parents.

That isn’t the point though. Was the adoption done legally is the question

Personally I don't need Justices to have been pure as the driven snow for their entire lives. I could be convinced otherwise, but I think Roberts is personally honest. I think it's important to acknowledge that. Otherwise, the truly corrupt like Thomas and, it's looking like Gorsuch, can hide behind the idea that their political opponents are just crying "wolf."

And personally I think someone willing to “adopt” two children extra-judicially doesn’t meet the standard for “personally honest.” Not even a little bit. You can’t be a Supreme Court Justice and wink at the entire notion of the law if it suits your personal purposes.

[Anonymous]

Yet another story where if it were a left leaning person, the conservatives would be foaming at the mouth over the corruption, the deep state, and more, but because it's one of their own, they will shrug.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Roberts’ 2000 adoption of Irish twins (literally), at a time when international adoption of them was illegal?

Why would they outlaw adoption of Irish twins?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Politico is reporting on another shady Republican Supreme Court Justice land deal. This time it's Neal Gorsuch who was having trouble selling some land in rural Colorado. Two years of futility. Then, nine days after he was confirmed to the Supreme Court, an offer comes through! And, wouldn't you know, it's from the CEO of one of the nation's biggest law firms with a lot of business in front of the Supreme Court. Gorsuch disclosed the sale but left the identity of the purchaser blank.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/25/neil-gorsuch-colorado-property-sale-00093579


I don't think he's as corrupt as Thomas though. And mystery still swirls around Kavanaugh and some of the debts he had that disappeared. I think Roberts is honest. And I don't have any reason to think Comey-Barrett has been bought. Alito is a hack through and through, so if something dirty came up about him, I wouldn't be at all surprised.

Oh, they are all corrupt in the left’s eyes. The goal is to get the majority back by false accusations. Standard playbook.

I think conservatives should hold the conservative justices to the same level as Biden’s son.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Roberts’ 2000 adoption of Irish twins (literally), at a time when international adoption of them was illegal?

Why would they outlaw adoption of Irish twins?

For decades the Catholic Church in Ireland forced unwed mothers to give up their babies and the church sold thousands of them to Americans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Roberts’ 2000 adoption of Irish twins (literally), at a time when international adoption of them was illegal?

Why would they outlaw adoption of Irish twins?

I believe Ireland requires couples adopting Irish babies to have lived in Ireland for at least a year.

[Anonymous]

Let’s not forget that G&T was at the center of another government ethics issue. Who can forget Jack Abramoff?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Abramoff

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Roberts’ 2000 adoption of Irish twins (literally), at a time when international adoption of them was illegal?

Get real. While I generally do not agree with Justice Roberts' legal opinions and perspectives, I certainly consider his adoption of 2 children a good thing. No doubt, those children are lucky to have the Roberts as parents.

That isn’t the point though. Was the adoption done legally is the question

Personally I don't need Justices to have been pure as the driven snow for their entire lives. I could be convinced otherwise, but I think Roberts is personally honest. I think it's important to acknowledge that. Otherwise, the truly corrupt like Thomas and, it's looking like Gorsuch, can hide behind the idea that their political opponents are just crying "wolf."

And personally I think someone willing to “adopt” two children extra-judicially doesn’t meet the standard for “personally honest.” Not even a little bit. You can’t be a Supreme Court Justice and wink at the entire notion of the law if it suits your personal purposes.

Th OP linked to a story from a credible news outlet citing facts and evidence. If you don't have the same then kindly shut it.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Roberts’ 2000 adoption of Irish twins (literally), at a time when international adoption of them was illegal?

Get real. While I generally do not agree with Justice Roberts' legal opinions and perspectives, I certainly consider his adoption of 2 children a good thing. No doubt, those children are lucky to have the Roberts as parents.

That isn’t the point though. Was the adoption done legally is the question

Personally I don't need Justices to have been pure as the driven snow for their entire lives. I could be convinced otherwise, but I think Roberts is personally honest. I think it's important to acknowledge that. Otherwise, the truly corrupt like Thomas and, it's looking like Gorsuch, can hide behind the idea that their political opponents are just crying "wolf."

And personally I think someone willing to “adopt” two children extra-judicially doesn’t meet the standard for “personally honest.” Not even a little bit. You can’t be a Supreme Court Justice and wink at the entire notion of the law if it suits your personal purposes.

Th OP linked to a story from a credible news outlet citing facts and evidence. If you don't have the same then kindly shut it.

The flip is your problem, weirdo? Roberts’ extra judicial adoption was reported, quietly, at the time he was confirmed. I would call quasi illegal adoption to be on par with baby snatching. I’m allowed to share my opinion on this site, same as you. So you can “kindly” shut it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Kagan has thrown recyclables in the trash.

Sotomayor has jaywalked.

Brown Jackson has had overdue library books.

Obviously, both sides have trouble following the rules. They’re all the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Politico is reporting on another shady Republican Supreme Court Justice land deal. This time it's Neal Gorsuch who was having trouble selling some land in rural Colorado. Two years of futility. Then, nine days after he was confirmed to the Supreme Court, an offer comes through! And, wouldn't you know, it's from the CEO of one of the nation's biggest law firms with a lot of business in front of the Supreme Court. Gorsuch disclosed the sale but left the identity of the purchaser blank.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/25/neil-gorsuch-colorado-property-sale-00093579


I don't think he's as corrupt as Thomas though. And mystery still swirls around Kavanaugh and some of the debts he had that disappeared. I think Roberts is honest. And I don't have any reason to think Comey-Barrett has been bought. Alito is a hack through and through, so if something dirty came up about him, I wouldn't be at all surprised.

Roberts is honest? The adoption of his two two children born in Ireland was neither honest nor legal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Roberts’ 2000 adoption of Irish twins (literally), at a time when international adoption of them was illegal?

Get real. While I generally do not agree with Justice Roberts' legal opinions and perspectives, I certainly consider his adoption of 2 children a good thing. No doubt, those children are lucky to have the Roberts as parents.

Two American children could have been just as lucky AND it would have been legal!