Regional Fair Housing - Public Comment Period

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ending SFH zoning is a sure way to get me to move out.

I'm ok with that. Maybe you can sell your house to a builder, who will replace it with a duplex, and then two households will have housing to move into. Win-win-win.

The SFH were here first. What's actually wrong with moving the affordable housing complexes further out into the exurbs? It's both cheaper for the community and healthier for the residents thanks to all the beautiful nature. Win-win-win, plus a fourth win for the environment!

The forests were here first. Then the forests were replaced by farmland. Then the farmland was replaced by homogeneous subdivisions. Now the homogeneous subdivisions are getting replaced by heterogeneous subdivisions. If you think it's so nice to be way out in the exurbs, there are plenty of houses for you to choose from.

We should not be celebrating the displacement of anyone. If someone's grandma has lived all her life in a SFH, she should not be pushed out by SJWs like you just because you want to build budget-busting public housing projects.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ending SFH zoning is a sure way to get me to move out.

I'm ok with that. Maybe you can sell your house to a builder, who will replace it with a duplex, and then two households will have housing to move into. Win-win-win.

The SFH were here first. What's actually wrong with moving the affordable housing complexes further out into the exurbs? It's both cheaper for the community and healthier for the residents thanks to all the beautiful nature. Win-win-win, plus a fourth win for the environment!

The forests were here first. Then the forests were replaced by farmland. Then the farmland was replaced by homogeneous subdivisions. Now the homogeneous subdivisions are getting replaced by heterogeneous subdivisions. If you think it's so nice to be way out in the exurbs, there are plenty of houses for you to choose from.

We should not be celebrating the displacement of anyone. If someone's grandma has lived all her life in a SFH, she should not be pushed out by SJWs like you just because you want to build budget-busting public housing projects.

Nobody is pushing out anybody's grandma, and nobody is building budget-busting public housing projects. So you don't have to worry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ending SFH zoning is a sure way to get me to move out.

I'm ok with that. Maybe you can sell your house to a builder, who will replace it with a duplex, and then two households will have housing to move into. Win-win-win.

The SFH were here first. What's actually wrong with moving the affordable housing complexes further out into the exurbs? It's both cheaper for the community and healthier for the residents thanks to all the beautiful nature. Win-win-win, plus a fourth win for the environment!

The forests were here first. Then the forests were replaced by farmland. Then the farmland was replaced by homogeneous subdivisions. Now the homogeneous subdivisions are getting replaced by heterogeneous subdivisions. If you think it's so nice to be way out in the exurbs, there are plenty of houses for you to choose from.

We should not be celebrating the displacement of anyone. If someone's grandma has lived all her life in a SFH, she should not be pushed out by SJWs like you just because you want to build budget-busting public housing projects.

Nobody is pushing out anybody's grandma, and nobody is building budget-busting public housing projects. So you don't have to worry.

That's great to hear, because nobody wants any ugly multiplex housing. Let's preserve the historic charm of our SFH communities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ending SFH zoning is a sure way to get me to move out.

I'm ok with that. Maybe you can sell your house to a builder, who will replace it with a duplex, and then two households will have housing to move into. Win-win-win.

The SFH were here first. What's actually wrong with moving the affordable housing complexes further out into the exurbs? It's both cheaper for the community and healthier for the residents thanks to all the beautiful nature. Win-win-win, plus a fourth win for the environment!

The forests were here first. Then the forests were replaced by farmland. Then the farmland was replaced by homogeneous subdivisions. Now the homogeneous subdivisions are getting replaced by heterogeneous subdivisions. If you think it's so nice to be way out in the exurbs, there are plenty of houses for you to choose from.

We should not be celebrating the displacement of anyone. If someone's grandma has lived all her life in a SFH, she should not be pushed out by SJWs like you just because you want to build budget-busting public housing projects.

Nobody is pushing out anybody's grandma, and nobody is building budget-busting public housing projects. So you don't have to worry.

That's great to hear, because nobody wants any ugly multiplex housing. Let's preserve the historic charm of our SFH communities.

The historic charm of cookie-cutter tract housing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ending SFH zoning is a sure way to get me to move out.

I'm ok with that. Maybe you can sell your house to a builder, who will replace it with a duplex, and then two households will have housing to move into. Win-win-win.

The SFH were here first. What's actually wrong with moving the affordable housing complexes further out into the exurbs? It's both cheaper for the community and healthier for the residents thanks to all the beautiful nature. Win-win-win, plus a fourth win for the environment!

Because people who live in affordable housing complexes need access to public transportation and other services only available close-in. Increased suburban sprawl is terrible for the environment & increases the risk of traffic accidents. I’m not sure how having the most vulnerable people do the most driving is “healthier.”

Concentrating poverty leads to crime.