She’s representing the American people abroad, is that not a job? |
What are the figures from trump? |
| Who paid when Trump took his three adult kids and two of their spouses to London to meet the Queen? |
The same people who paid for Chelsea Clinton and Malia and Sasha to do stuff with their parents: taxpayers. Which is normal. We are talking about a grandchild and her husband living in the WH and going on trips with her grandma. |
So well in excess of one billion dollars! (I bet she gets some free toilet paper too.) |
I don’t know, I’d figure his figure are more, because of inflation. As Bidens will be even greater. Can you find Trump or Bidens figures and post them? Also find the amount taxpayers paid for Michelle Obama’s mom to live in the WH for 8 years. Post them in this thread for quick reference, with links. |
And we pay for the maid to change the roll when it’s empty! Democrats, the saviors of the downtrodden! |
| Because family values? |
|
This is such a weird thread, especially as there are already sunk costs for this trip as she is travelling with her grandmother. It's not as if the GOP is arguing "'let's curtail Naomi Biden's (alleged) expenses and plow that into services for the unhoused."
Why does this matter? |
|
So Naomi and Peter live rent free, pay no utility bills, parking expenses, security costs, etc. They pay nothing for home maintenance, upkeep, home insurance, grass cutting and lawn maintenance. They pay for dry cleaning, do they do their own laundry, or does the WH staff do their laundry and clean their bedding? Does the WH custodial and janitorial staff clean their living quarters? Yes, of course.
How much would all cost for people who live in DC? Estimate how much Naomi and Pete are getting free from taxpayers. |
Financial transparency doesn’t matter? Taxpayers want to know. We pay our expenses and their expenses. We should have an accounting of how our money is spent and who is supported by it. A newly married big law couple should not be supported in any way by taxpayer dollars. |
Is she making speeches? or is she just helping an old woman (Jill) with the difficulties of travel for free. |
Because it's a perk of the office for family members and always has been. End of story. Move on, OP. |
I'm fine with it. Especially after taxpayers financially propped up the Trumps, and their various spawn, and MaraLago, for 4 years. |
That's what's so weird here. Didn't Trump take more vaca days in his first year than Obama did in his first term? Didn't Trump's travel's expenses in his first month as president exceed what Obama spent in a year? The prior admin was an outlier in such kinds of expenses as well as who was expending them. Yet we are now focused on a young woman (and her husband), who are probably providing some emotional support to the grandparents, who happen to be POTUS and FLOTUS. I just don't get it. |