I heard differently, that more than one of the administrators are looking at options in other districts. Not that they are being forced out. |
My solution would have been for those in positions of power to have constructed a building that’s a school first rather than a vanity piece for the superintendent and to have anticipated actual needs so that a) there wasn’t a parking shortage in the first place b) there wasn’t ongoing major construction encroaching on and eating up the limited space that is there. I’d have constructed a building where certain teachers don’t have to essentially abandon their classrooms Friday afternoons because we don’t want the community groups using them on the weekends to feel like they can’t make themselves at home. But then the whole complex is form over function, which is why everything breaks constantly, which shouldn’t be an issue in a brand new, EXPENSIVE space. If we wanted a broken-down unusable heap of a building we could have saved 7-8 figures and just stayed in the old space. |
^DP and I’ll add that I would have designed a new building without all of the open collaborative areas and added classrooms. I would make sure each teacher has a room or at least an office that isn’t in the middle of a staff lunchroom. I would also add sufficient bathrooms for teachers to use so they didn’t need to share with students.
The old building was falling apart but was more functional as a school. |
The problem is that everyone in a position of power at Meridian either is there for 2-3 years to build a resume before going to FCPS or Loudoun OR has never worked anywhere else and doesn’t know there are other ways to do things.
Potemkin school. |
(by the way, I notice you did not propose a solution, just more complaining....) No, not a school board member. "Really sucked before" - do you mean the old high school? Yeah, it did suck. And we needed a new high school, which requires construction. I don't understand people who live in jurisdictions and then complain endlessly about them. Falls Church City is not the cheapest place to live in the area, so if you're living here, it's probably because you want the sense of community and/or the schools. So do your research before you live somewhere. It's been clear that the high school was dilapidated and would need to be torn down and rebuilt for at least a decade if not more. Don't live in FCC if you don't want the hassle of an old run down high school building being replaced by a new school. There are cheaper places to live within just a few miles. Problem solved. |
The reason why there is construction is because that development is paying for the school, which is big enough to withstand a nearly doubling in the student population (so it will last a while without needed to be rebuilt or expanded). If there was no development, taxes would have skyrocketed. I have not heard anything about "everything breaking constantly." And I believe there was a public vote on the school construction, and the school board, which hires the Superintendent, is also up for election every few years, so it seems to me that the community has been given multiple opportunities to weigh in and make their voices heard. |
Luckily no one is forced to live in Falls Church City; you should definitely move to Fairfax or Loudoun or Arlington and send your kids to school there. |
Done and done ![]() |
The best reason not to live in FCC is gatekeepers like this person. I heard great things about the schools, but many of those things turned out to be less than accurate, but rather than try to have them addressed, the Mayor of Falls Church here just tells folks to get out. No wonder y’all have a reputation as holier than thou. |