Instead of regurgitating GOP talking points, would you care to address the RED Murder State problem that I addressed on page one? Or, will you just admit to your cognitive dissonance? |
Amazingly some people need an actual deterrent to not commit crime. The threat of being arrested was enough of a deterrent for some people. Remove it and what do you expect? |
Yep. Our Wegmans eliminated their program where you checked yourself out with the scanners (I forget the name) due to theft. This is in a high SES, pretty low crime overall, area so people have the money to pay for things. It's revolting. |
Could not agree more with your assessment of my fellow Americans. And it's not just "the poors." |
+1 |
+1 Same for some kids in school. They need an appropriate consequence for wrong behavior and not just rewards for good behavior. |
I used and liked the Wegmans scanner program in Fairfax and was disappointed when it went away. But the Giant near me still has a handheld scanner program and has for many years. I wonder why it was a problem for Wegmans but isn't for Giant? I was surprised because, as you said, this is a high SES/low crime area. |
America has some of the highest incarceration rates in the world. Penalties like stiff proesecutions are simply not a deterrent. And putting a lien on poor peoples' income stream isn't either. Have you ever been poor? I have and I can tell you it's not a deterrent to many things. You'll do anything to save a buck or come out ahead a bit. And while I didn't outright steal things, I def. gamed things like parking to avoid having to pay it and just hoped I wouldn't get caught. |
Being poor and stealing a loaf of bread or a carton of milk is not the same as stealing hundreds and thousands of dollars of name brand merchandise. Those people are simply thieves without a conscience. |
Live your vote. |
NP. Means that people think they are entitled because they are being told they are |
Credit card companies and large retail chains have been writing off theft and fraud loses for decades, under both Democratic and Republican administrations. They're still in business so the status quo must be working for them. It must not be profitable for them to pursue thieves if they identify and/or catch them.
I found this out about 30 years ago when someone got ahold of my credit card number and charged about $700 of goods and services (a psychic consult!) to that number. The cc card company did nothing about it. |
Oh yes, because we are talking about poors stealing bread and food for survival.. Ha, no. They're stealing PlayStations, iphones, electronics, designer clothes, tvs, and jewelry. Best buy has the same issue with increasing thefts. What exactly does best buy sell thats vital for poors' existence and survival? |
Again, you haven't been poor. Obviously. Just because you think poor people should only want for necessities, that is just not how it is. They still have desires and wants other than "Food to eat.' They are human beings. They want the purses, tvs, ear buds, etc. whatever and sometimes people will break the rules to get it. It's not right. It's not ethical, legal, moral, etc. etc. But just because it's not, doesn't mean they won't take the chance if they can get a little bit of what they are missing. Being poor is hard. I don't condone it and not everyone who is poor does it. But it is not correct to say that none of them "have a conscience." Let me guess, you're one of those people who think kids in the charity christmas programs shouldn't ask for expensive items? Just socks and underwear? |
This is why Amazon is creating the stores where you need to scan in and do not check out. I think all stores will eventually do this. |