That's one way to deal with it. The other way is to give high-school credit bearing courses the same GPA weighting whether they are taken in MS or HS. Give intensified MS courses (that are HS-credit bearing) the same higher weighting that HS intensified courses receive. Then kids wouldn't have to drop MS courses to enhance their GPA. That should be an easy fix. Why not do that? |
APS doesn't give added weight to intensified courses, only AP, IB, DE |
The influence on GPA is really small. I don't see why people care about dropping an A in those classes just because it brings an unweighted grade into the calculation. It's not like APS does strict ranking where hundredths of a point matter. A weighted 4.0+ = rank 1, at least at W-L.
We dropped a MS grade that was a B but let the As stand |
Thanks, that's helpful to know. |
Um, for some kids, the middle school grades will boost the GPA. If you had As in middle school and Bs in high school, those As will bring up the average. |
High school intensified classes are not weighted. HS-level MS intensified classes, therefore, are given the same weight. I don't think classes should be dropped - especially if the student earned an A or B - just to boost a GPA. If nobody drops, everybody is evaluated on the same level. |
Yes, that aligns with PP's comment to eliminate the hoop jumping. It's the other kids whose MS A's lower their GPA that drop their MS classes. Either all MS courses taken for high school credit should count, or none of them should - for every student. period. Students taking high school level classes in MS should already have an edge because their high school courseload should be more rigorous than their peers who are taking grade-level classes. There shouldn't be a need for numbers-games. If you don't want an A to count from a middle school course, then why take it? Again, you're still at an advantage if you're taking more advanced levels of a subject than your classmates, that's why. If you screw it up, you screw it up. Regardless of individual course grades, the schools (countrywide so it's standard) should either not include them in their HS GPA or include them. If anything, it's the more average/below average student who needs a break for college competitiveness. |
My kid, now a freshman in college, had straight A's through middle school and high school, where he took lots of AP, DE, and IB classes (minus one B+ in HS). He had 5 HS credits in MS, and considered whether to delete them from his transcript. Deleting them would have improved his GPA (since the the middle school classes were not given the GPA bump). In the end, he decided not to drop them, since the increase in GPA would have been very small, and he felt that seeing an additional 5 A's would have made the transcript look better. He finished with a 4.53 GPA, a 35 ACT score, and an IB Diploma, but did not get into any highly ranked schools (highest ranked school he got into was Wake Forest). So I don't know whether he made the right choice on the transcript, though I'm doubtful that it made much of a difference. |
I'll bet your are correct. Only so many kids from a given high school are going to get accepted by a given elite university. There are other kids in your child's HS who also had impressive stats, not to mention kids across the country who had the same or higher. He's happy and successful....he made the "right" decision. Thing is, so many people believe there is only one "right" decision. Life paths might be different, yes; but doesn't necessarily make a decision "wrong." |
He has ended up at a good spot for him. Not sure if any of the schools which rejected him would have been better, and don't think there is any way to really know that. For purposes of this thread, however, I don't think a few hundredths of a point on the cumulative GPA would really matter. If you have a straight A HS student, it might make sense to remove any "B's" from MS, but I don't think taking out middle school "A's" would be that meaningful. |