On the contrary, HIPAA specifically excludes exchange of information between health care providers in the course of ongoing care for the same patient. This never requires a waiver. I can find the citation, if you would like. |
|
Yes the school system contracts it’s school nurse program to children’s. |
| I would be ticked if this happened to me. If I don’t identify DCPS as ok to communicate with they should not contact them. This is an invasion of privacy. |
YES. Even more so! Whether I'm the parent or the teen in question. |
|
I think there is some confusion here about HIPAA. I'm pretty sure this type of use/disclosure (I'm not sure what the legal difference is) is allowed for "treatment". It's coordination of care.
https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/disclosures-treatment-payment-health-care-operations/index.html A covered entity may, without the individual’s authorization: Use or disclose protected health information for its own treatment, payment, and health care operations activities. For example: A hospital may use protected health information about an individual to provide health care to the individual and may consult with other health care providers about the individual’s treatment. |
I don't know about the specifics of the law in this case, but I'm just giving my opinion: that the system works well. Actually, I'd be surprised if there was a violation, since surely they must have worked around privacy concerns. Either there is a loophole in the law or OP signed something allowing the hospital to communicate with the school nurse. |
No. The nurse is the health care provider to the same patient (the child), and this is a part of the ongoing medical care. Following up on an emergency room visit is standard care.
More specifically,
|
Because a miscarriage can be a big deal medically and lead to dangerous complications, like hemorrhage and infection. To say nothing of psychological and social issues, but here, for medical reasons, a follow-up is very much needed. What's wrong with you?!? |
|
OP, I would be irked, too. Legal or not, it feels like a violation — and an unnecessary, big-brother-style one unless your child is past due for truly urgent care.
We give lip-service to protecting privacy but then come up with a billion and one excuses why this, that, or the other outweighs the right to privacy. |
They didn’t contact DCPS. Where are you getting that they did? |
The facts as stated by OP do not fall under this provision that you cite. I work in both the ambulatory setting (ie, your kid's pediatrician) and also in a local ICU. Unless there's something the OP is intentionally failing to mention about the event that brought her kid to the ED, then the ED staff does not need to "coordinate care" with the CNMC-employed RN who is assigned to the kid's DCPS. A possible hypothetical exception would be if, say, kid has severe asthma attack, is taken to ED, is given hospital-grade nebulizer in the ED, asthma flare is resolved, ED provider writes script for **never before used** asthma inhaler for home use. Communication is sent via internal health record from ED doctor to CNMC RN stationed at DCPS saying something to the effect of "please follow up with Timmy and confirm that new albuterol metered dose inhaler is therapeutic and no further flares have occurred since discharge. Confirm that student has medication available on site at DCPS during school day." If something analogous to this ^^^ occurred , then OP has no leg to stand on. This shouldn't be "offensive" and it's not a violation of law. See also, concussion follow up, seizure follow up, and similar. What is interesting to me is, what if CNMC DIDN'T contract to put its employees in DCPS? What if instead MedStar did, or Johns Hopkins? Then you wouldn't see the sort of hypothetical situation I used. Which is fine, just different. |
You are assuming, by citing this provision, that the school nurse is treating the kid for the same condition. You don't have any facts to support that. it may be the case that the school nurse is going to "treat" the kid on the school property -- or might be called upon to do so. Or not. If the kid went to the ER to have a raisin removed from his nose, then you cannot make a credible claim that school nurse will continue the plan of care when school resumes on Monday and continue to "treat" the now-removed nose raisin. There's nothing to treat. OP would have to be willing to divulge what the medical issue was that was treated in the ER to make a call on this. |
| DCPS does this because there’s a lot of poor people in the school system without regular care. They treat everyone in the system the same, regardless of your socioeconomic status. |
|
OP, school nurses in DCPS and most charters are NOT employees of the LEA and schools. DC school nurses are employed by Children's National or Department of Health.
If your school is a Title 1 school they are obligated by law to follow up on any and all concerns with your child's health, despite what you may opine or interpret about privacy or HIPAA. Many school nurses catheterize children, provide extensive medical support, and are highly specialized beyond the traditional perception of bandaids and icepacks. |