| Really weird because the lawyer is dying that these are true but Haddish herself is saying it was meant to be funny but it wasn’t. That means these tapes and acts are true. Gross. |
I think her defense is going to be that she was just a pawn along with the kids, with someone else directing the situation and taking control. |
This is DCUM. Take one guess. |
Because there is video evidence and she basically admitted it. |
You can watch the video online |
This makes sense, thank you! |
It was taken down. |
https://web.archive.org/web/20140825172532/Youtube.com/watch?v=lyqpfA-Z_eU Don't know if the copy and paste will work, but it is all over the internet. |
|
OMG!! This is disgusting. There is no defense for this. They even played RKelly and made an MJ joke so they knew this was wrong! I can’t see how they thought this was funny.
I m a black female and I tried to jump on the bandwagon and support TH. I thought Girls Trip was a mess and her acting is non-existent and her latest standup was not funny at all. Netflix tried to pump up her 15. Min of fame, but she does not have much talent. I am so sorry this mother of these kids had to go thru this…. Fighting for her babies. Wonder why former suits were thrown out? |
Isn’t the defense is that it’s acting not real? |
|
Her statement on instagram:
“I know people have a bunch of questions. I get it. I'm right there with you. Unfortunately, because there is an ongoing legal case, there's very little that I can say right now. But, clearly, while this sketch was intended to be comedic, it wasn't funny at all - and I deeply regret having agreed to act in it. I really look forward to being able to share a lot more about this situation as soon as I can.“ |
| Is a kid in his underwear considered child p*rn? |
Huh??? So you can do lewd acts to a child if it's ina scene? |
|
She was the one who knew the kids and involved them in the skits. She was not a passive participant. She was the one the then kids say was directing what they should do.
For her to know try and say all she did was act in the same skits is just wrong. While her intention may have been to create humour (and not sexually motivate), she knowingly harmed these children by sexualizing them in the skits. She created child porn material for those who do have the intention to watch for sexual reasons. She knew what she was doing was wrong. |
| I could only watch the first few seconds of that skit, can someone summarize what happens? |