We all read your tripe on the GP listserv months ago. You are not making any more sense now. |
The "proposed Stoddert boundary" is one of those untruths that will never die. There never was a proposed Stoddert boundary. DCPS showed a suggestion at one meeting and quickly walked it back. It is also completely untrue that "The only way you get enough kids is to cut Glover Park in half." That's been debunked so many times but there's a core of dead-enders who just don't want to believe it. |
If you truly believe there are no plans to cut Glover Park in half -- and that there shouldn't be -- you should support Cheh's resolution. That would help make up for GP enduring individuals from other neighborhoods gaslighting us on the GP listserv and elsewhere. |
NP I don't have a horse in this race but what PPP wrote makes sense to me. Maybe (and I'm just spitballing here) the issue is not coherence of what they are saying, but rather that you are so close to and emotionally involved in the issue that you lack perspective or rationality. |
The earlier post is full of factual inaccuracies. If you don’t understand anything about the issue, you can I guess be forgiven for overlooking them. |
Stoddert boosters accusing others of gaslighting? Well, hello pot . . . Glover Park deserves absolutely nothing from the rest of the city. Your community - led by your ANC chair and PTA - have been throwing the most egregious beggar-thy-neighbor tantrums, dreaming up non-existent threats, and spreading falsehoods formulated to deny other community’s the walkable elementary school that you all insist that your community - and only your community - has some divine right to. Now you’ve gone and got the CM involved in a pathetic attempt to win for yourselves something no one else in the city has. It reminds me of something but I can’t quite remember what. Oh, that’s right, the dear old residents of Chain Bridge Road and University Terrace and their quixotic quest to have the city close their street to through traffic. That worked wonderfully for them, didn’t it? Well, odds are that this is going to end about as well for you all. Streisand Effect coming at you . . . |
If you are so poorly informed about local educational issues as to not know Wilson’s new name or, even worse, that a new high school will open next fall to do exactly what your first paragraph is calling for, then it is worth asking yourself why you think you are doing the cause you espouse any favors by commenting publicly. |
Yes, that was really confusing. They already have a plan for that? |
|
Just a note for those imagining seeing an ES from your house that your kids cannot attend, remember Proximity Preference will still be a factor.
"Proximity preference A lottery preference provided to students who live greater than a half-mile walking distance from their DCPS in-boundary elementary school and apply to attend a DCPS out-of-boundary school that is a half-mile or less walking distance from their home. This preference only applies to students enrolling in PK3 – grade 5. Proximity preference is not offered at DCPS citywide schools. The application will automatically apply this preference based on the guardian's home address provided on the application." [source: https://www.myschooldc.org/faq/key-terms] |
UNTRUE. A LEASE is not a giveaway. Every mayor for over a decade could've taken back that old, small building which is leased and repaired by a nonprofit school for kids with learning disabilities that's been in DC for 50 YEARS. DCPS rejected that site for years while it kicked the overcrowding can down the road Stop spreading ableist BS. Lab School's lease is not the reason for DCPS failure to plan and the political nonsense that comes with total mayoral control of education. Make like Elsa and let it go. |
Exhibit A of why DC needs politically independent education oversight. If OSSE wasn't a mayoral plaything, objective data and analysis could ensure equity and not perpetuate privilege of donors WotP. There are much worse things than cramped classrooms for 1he 16% of DCPS kids that are white. We Ward 3 folks really need to suck it up. All DC kids are entitled to FREE education -- not convenient locations set in stone to ensure property values of the few. |
Oh gawd, pity the poor “non-profit” private school that charges over $50k for annual tuition, serves a student base that predominantly doesn’t live in DC, creates massive traffic jams and parking problems for the neighborhood, and paid through the nose for top-flight lobbyists to help it push through a multi-decade lease - announced on Christmas Eve and not approved or discussed by the Council or any other local deliberative body - that gives it exclusive use of a public building needed to educate local children - both able and disabled - for a tiny fraction of what it should cost and then refuses to engage with the local community on potential alternative solutions to school over-crowding. The facts apologize for being “ableist”. |
I love listening to upper NW people talk about "splitting Glover Park" as if it was East/West Berlin or some other actual line of demarcation. |
Suck what up? This issue has nothing to do with denying something to someone outside of Ward 3. And no, “white” kids (by which I am guessing you mean non-Black kids) don’t deserve to be in cramped classrooms anymore than anyone else. And cramping them up does not equate to benefit to someone else. What odd thinking. |
| I'm glad Mary Cheh is doing this. It's nonsensical to send kids that live a block from Stoddert to a different school miles away, and I can't imagine the Council would oppose this common sense measure. |