Eva Longoria looks fantastic at 47

[Anonymous]

Agree she looks good.

But please be aware that all celebs have plastic surgery in addition to $ for help with diet, exercise, and kids. Don’t compare yourself to surgically enhanced celebrities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She looks great, but probably hasn't hit menopause yet.

Winner winner chicken dinner! You can tell who hasn’t hasn’t hit menopause basically by looking at them.

Yep. I looked like this at 47. At 56, very different, even at the same weight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She looks great, but probably hasn't hit menopause yet.

Winner winner chicken dinner! You can tell who hasn’t hasn’t hit menopause basically by looking at them.

Yep. I looked like this at 47. At 56, very different, even at the same weight.

Sure uou did

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She looks great, but probably hasn't hit menopause yet.

Winner winner chicken dinner! You can tell who hasn’t hasn’t hit menopause basically by looking at them.

Yep. I looked like this at 47. At 56, very different, even at the same weight.

Sure uou did

LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There's no way she's 47, not because of how she looks, because I'm 45 and in the early 2000's she was five to eight years my elder.

I seriously think that celebrities pay people to silently edit their ages across media platforms in a very slow and strategic way. It's not all at once, but she was definitely more than two years older than me twelve years ago.

whaaat? you have no concept of time. She was 28 at the start of DH, which was very young. I was 30 and loved that show. Guess what? I'm 49 now, and she's 47. In no universe was she ever 5-8 years older than you, unless you're currently 39-42. Her age was very widely publicized during desperate housewives run because of how young she was. She was and has remained 2 yrs younger than me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There's no way she's 47, not because of how she looks, because I'm 45 and in the early 2000's she was five to eight years my elder.

I seriously think that celebrities pay people to silently edit their ages across media platforms in a very slow and strategic way. It's not all at once, but she was definitely more than two years older than me twelve years ago.

That's a bizarre idea, and not true. Birthdates are established. They don't change.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Agree she looks good.

But please be aware that all celebs have plastic surgery in addition to $ for help with diet, exercise, and kids. Don’t compare yourself to surgically enhanced celebrities.

+100.

[Anonymous]

Guys in their 20s and 30s would line up to be with her. She's still got it!

[Anonymous]

I think she looks her age though.

[Anonymous]

47 is when it all started to go for sh-t for me. I’m 50 and I look like a thin person who had a Costco sized jar of jelly injected between my uterus and my skin.

But I never had a rack like her, sadly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'd be more impressed if she looked like this at 57.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Agree she looks good.

But please be aware that all celebs have plastic surgery in addition to $ for help with diet, exercise, and kids. Don’t compare yourself to surgically enhanced celebrities.

And genetics

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree she looks good.

But please be aware that all celebs have plastic surgery in addition to $ for help with diet, exercise, and kids. Don’t compare yourself to surgically enhanced celebrities.

And genetics

Yes, one thing that becomes very clear if you ever spend any time dealing with celebrities like this up close is that many of them were simply born MUCH better looking than the rest of us. This is hard to understand if you only see them in photos or on screens, where they are generally surrounded by people who are either also genetically blessed or who have spent a lot to look genetically blessed. But if you interact with the beautiful people up close you realize that even without the plastic surgery and other enhancements (which they all 100% get, especially after 35, but often even before that), these are beautiful people. Most of them got their "big break" before the age of 25, usually before they've had a chance to do a lot of work. They are better looking than 99% of people.

A good example is Jennifer Garner. She got her first real roles in her late 20s and if you look at photos from then, it's clear she had work done once she hit stardom with Alias (the biggest tell is her mouth -- she had a gummy smile in her 20s and had it fixed). But I met her at auditions back then and she was absolutely gorgeous and definitely had "it" factor even though she'd never done anything. Some people really are kind of born to be stars. They cannot pass as normal people. Never met Longoria but my guess is that she falls in this camp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree she looks good.

But please be aware that all celebs have plastic surgery in addition to $ for help with diet, exercise, and kids. Don’t compare yourself to surgically enhanced celebrities.

And genetics

Yes, one thing that becomes very clear if you ever spend any time dealing with celebrities like this up close is that many of them were simply born MUCH better looking than the rest of us. This is hard to understand if you only see them in photos or on screens, where they are generally surrounded by people who are either also genetically blessed or who have spent a lot to look genetically blessed. But if you interact with the beautiful people up close you realize that even without the plastic surgery and other enhancements (which they all 100% get, especially after 35, but often even before that), these are beautiful people. Most of them got their "big break" before the age of 25, usually before they've had a chance to do a lot of work. They are better looking than 99% of people.

A good example is Jennifer Garner. She got her first real roles in her late 20s and if you look at photos from then, it's clear she had work done once she hit stardom with Alias (the biggest tell is her mouth -- she had a gummy smile in her 20s and had it fixed). But I met her at auditions back then and she was absolutely gorgeous and definitely had "it" factor even though she'd never done anything. Some people really are kind of born to be stars. They cannot pass as normal people. Never met Longoria but my guess is that she falls in this camp.

No offense but Jennifer Garner is not super gorgeous. She’s pretty average.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I didn't look this good at 27.

Me neither. Good for her!