Wait, what? My 5th grader has never learned cursive but can read it. It's really not that difficult unless the handwriting is sloppy (in which case cursive vs print wouldn't really matter...) |
OP clearly did not have much instruction in grammar, let alone cursive. |
What is the reason for no longer teaching cursive? It’s extremely useful for taking notes and writing more quickly and efficiently. Plus, it helps children work on fine motor skills. |
+100 What are these notes about? Excused absences are submitted online. Little Johnny going home with little Larlo is an email to the front office. |
| Explain to me the downside of cursive.... |
THIS! Good lord. |
I am a parent and I cannot understand my child's writing, he said it was cursive
|
| If a teacher can’t read cursive, that’s pathetic. It should be a requirement. |
Same. There has been an uptick in stupid posts by people who don’t seem to know grammar. It is making DCUM much less useful. |
|
A teacher should absolutely know how to read and write in cursive. If you don’t, you are uneducated and have no business teaching!
|
Do you prefer block printing? |
Blackletter or Gothic please. |
I agree, but if your kids aren’t learning cursive, what does that mean for future teachers? As far as I can tell, the kids don’t learn spelling or grammar basics either. Heck, they could at least learn proficient typing skills if cursive is off the table. It’s ridiculous. Who or what is dismantling what I think should be key elements of an elementary language arts education?. |
No Child Left Behind and teaching to standardized tests is the reason. They don't have time because they have to teach to all the stupid arbitrary standards. I wish they would get rid of it. |
NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND. |