Pretty sure you've posted this phrase in response to other posts on this forum. I think a lot of people would agree with your point here, and would find the previous poster to be rude. But when you tack on this phrase, it makes you sound like a jerk. -np |
Of course not. More than one creates too much of a negative effect on our environment that it would be unfair to all of the earth’s children. |
You think only one person posts this? Got it. |
| For the 2nd diapers. And if a good friend diapers and food |
| A gift card for meal delivery. I also commiserate with the suggestion for a monogrammed blanket or similar because we probably got 3 of those for #1 and none for #2. However, as it turns out #1's favorite blankets are none of the monogrammed ones, so I probably just need to pass those on before #2 learns to read their names. |
What is the point of this type of response? It doesn't make you sound smart. |
+1 |
|
Hooded towel with baby name or monogram, large enough to still fit one toddlerhood rolls around. Often the existing one(s) are kinda ratty by the time the new baby comes. And lots of pix get taken of first bath and other water cuteness.
Bonus for towels with animal ears, etc. |
|
Hard cover book and coordinating plush toy — eg, Make Way for Ducklings and duck stuffed animal.
|
Like this one best... |
Having a second kid is not a justifiable reason to expect a gift. |
I see you see getting a gift is the only way to celebrate. |
Oh, having more than child entitles you to get more freebies. |
We expected no freebies. We reused everything from our first child and purchased anything else we needed ourselves. I was responding to the apparent tone/attitude that only the first child matters to some people. I find that abhorrent and sad. |
Why on earth would you buy birthday presents for the oldest child but not any younger children in the family? Such favoritism. Poor kids. |