| Anyone from a private school that uses this that has found it helpful? Is it really "just" the weighted GPA issue that makes it give nothing valuable back? Or is there some other place to enter other information that we've missed? |
Yes this, it gives really strange groupings of schools, where you will have a bunch of schools ranked in the 20s as targets and then a school ranked 80. |
|
So I've used kickstart with my older DC (now a college freshman) and am just starting to use it with my younger DC, now a high school junior.
it's supposed to help your kid build a balanced college list by incorporating the school's historical data, then telling you if you've got too many reaches, or out of reach schools (unlikely) etc. OP, if your high school's kickstart is only using unweighted GPAs, it's because your high school set it up like that. Our high school shifted from weighted to unweighted GPAs, so with my older DC, we used weighted, and the younger DC we are using unweighted. I think you have to recognize its limitations. First, the numbers don't take into account if prior students had hooks or not (or, if your kid has a hook or not). Second, I don't think it takes into account if these prior kids were accepted ED or RD. For instance, my older DC goes to College X, and from our high school, no one gets into College X on RD. So, if you don't know that, and you put College X on your list, but not as your #1, it may look like your kid has a good chance, but they don't. So the way to use it, I think, is to come up with some sort of list that is balanced, and then discuss it with your school's college counselor to see how to tweak it. |
Cite your source. My understanding is that the use of weighted GPA varies from one college to another, and my source of information is the colleges themselves, who I meet with frequently as part of my job. |
|
Bumping this up.
How accurate was college kickstart for your kids and their list? At a private school with an unweighted GPA and it seems to give everything a very low probability, regardless of the ranking. Even schools that are very easy to get into, it gives a pretty low probability. |
|
What is more accurate?
College kickstart or Naviance? |
| kickstart is worthless. You are better off looking at common data set. |
|
We used it as a tool to get a balanced list.
For some schools Kickstart was more conservative than Naviance. For example - 99% of applicants from our high school get accepted to Temple. My DC is right smack in the middle of Temple applicants from our high school and Kickstart had it as a Target - but we thought it was a likely. On the other hand, BU is a school that our high school does not have a strong track record for getting students accepted. My DC Naviance point is not near anyone that has gotten accepted - but Kickstart has it as a Reach as opposed to an Unlikely. For our family - it was another tool to look at in the process. This weekend we will hear from 2 schools. Kickstart profile - one reach and one likely Naviance profile (from the overview page)- Match and Safety I will report back ..... |
And yet many Ivies and top 10 report 3.9 average. These schools obviously are reporting unweighted GPAs. |
Please do!! |
| Have you tried College Vine? Hiw dies it compare to kickstarter? I felt like College Vine gave reasonable recos. |
| does |
2 acceptances! |
So naviance more accurate? Congrats! |
Naviance had it as a match / Kickstart as a reach. Got accepted - but reaches are things that you might get accepted to. The reach was ED - so we are out will not not have any more data. |