LC produced reading and math proficiency rates (61% and 44%) for economically disadvantaged kids last year that other ACPS ES can only dream of in normal times. Is your view of equity that LC shouldn't have a higher student to teacher ratio? Or that all the other schools should have a higher ratio to meet LC's ratio? |
LC also uses a superior curriculum that is based on core knowledge rather than on teachers pay teachers worksheets. Is that equitable? |
If the school district is constantly talking about equity. As in it's the reason kids couldn't eat lunch outside because it's not equitable for all the schools then all the elementary schools should have the same low teacher to student ratio. Perhaps school ratings would go up if they had the same resources. |
"LC also uses a superior curriculum that is based on core knowledge rather than on teachers pay teachers worksheets. Is that equitable?
"
Worksheets are simply materials, not a curriculum of "core knowledge". As someone who works in a school I can tell you as a fact that all teachers use them from time to time. |