Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This thread is simply inappropriate. I am no fan of this supposed protected person, but no one should be posting online updates about ss protection. Stupid gossip. No one else's business.
Totally agreed. This is not "Metropolitan DC Local Politics". This is someone's personal security notwithstanding his politics or draft dodging status.
You are assuming that he’s under protection and not investigation. Which could be the wrong assumption.
It still none of your business.
It became our business the day he took a government paycheck. As a taxpayer I don’t want to pay for protection for Trump or any of his lackeys. If gossiping about the goings on at his home makes him feel less secure so be it. I’m hoping he’s under investigation though.
No. Government employees should be protected from crazy nutjobs who want to kill them, because even the kindest person in any position of visibility will have credible threats made against them at some point. It's just the nature of things. So we need to protect everyone in those high-visibility positions, even the ones who are themselves crazy nutjobs.
And, yes, we've got to assume it's a safety issue.