Anyone at an E3 school?

[Anonymous]

We were told we aren't allowed to use Prodigy anymore in FCPS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We were told we aren't allowed to use Prodigy anymore in FCPS.

15:10 here.
What is the connection to Prodigy? (I admit I'm not familiar with it.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We were told we aren't allowed to use Prodigy anymore in FCPS.

15:10 here.
What is the connection to Prodigy? (I admit I'm not familiar with it.)

A poster upthread said teacher was letting kid use it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We were told we aren't allowed to use Prodigy anymore in FCPS.

15:10 here.
What is the connection to Prodigy? (I admit I'm not familiar with it.)

A poster upthread said teacher was letting kid use it.

Oh, I see. I kept missing it when I went back and skimmed. Thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How could every 3rd and 4th grader POSSIBLY be ready to learn advanced math, when almost every child is BEHIND in math due to 1.5 years of no school? That is completely ridiculous.

I’m an ES teacher, but not at an E3 school (this is the first I’ve heard of it). We are supposed to give every student “access to rigor”. That means we use AAP curriculum such as Jacob’s Ladder, Socratic Seminar, M3 etc. We also use the Critical and Creative Thinking (CCT) lessons, but they don’t count as meeting the school board’s access to rigor goal. I get frustrated because the lessons are simply too difficult for most of our students. Some get very frustrated. Because they are too difficult we spend time during our CT meetings trying to adapt them and scaffold the lessons. I think we’d be better off focused on the “regular” curriculum and getting that in.

Last year during DL, my gen ed kid's teacher had the kids do several interesting CCT lessons. No CCT lessons this year. Is it only for AAP this year?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How could every 3rd and 4th grader POSSIBLY be ready to learn advanced math, when almost every child is BEHIND in math due to 1.5 years of no school? That is completely ridiculous.

I’m an ES teacher, but not at an E3 school (this is the first I’ve heard of it). We are supposed to give every student “access to rigor”. That means we use AAP curriculum such as Jacob’s Ladder, Socratic Seminar, M3 etc. We also use the Critical and Creative Thinking (CCT) lessons, but they don’t count as meeting the school board’s access to rigor goal. I get frustrated because the lessons are simply too difficult for most of our students. Some get very frustrated. Because they are too difficult we spend time during our CT meetings trying to adapt them and scaffold the lessons. I think we’d be better off focused on the “regular” curriculum and getting that in.

Last year during DL, my gen ed kid's teacher had the kids do several interesting CCT lessons. No CCT lessons this year. Is it only for AAP this year?

All of my kids (level IV, level II, and no designation) are doing CCT lessons at our school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We were told we aren't allowed to use Prodigy anymore in FCPS.

This must be something that the school decides.

I told my older kid if the teacher tells them to do ST Math, to do Prodigy instead.