EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad hasn’t responded to Angelina’s low blow of having Shiloh file to legally change her last name. I think he is used to her tactics by now and expects it. He needs to continue to rise above her pettiness.

One of the few statements he’s made about her personality, through court papers, is that she has no self-regulating mechanism. I’m sure not much surprises him at this point. It was said he was always worried about her not eating and that she would lock herself in her room for days at a time.

So then he should’ve gotten a divorce like he did to his first wife. Instead he got sloshed and assaulted a bunch of family members on a plane.

The story keeps changing. Now it's a bunch of family members@

The story was retracted and sealed. More details coming out doesn’t mean it's changing.

It was already investigated and no charges filed. This reeks of desperation on the part of Angelina because she can't control the narrative.

Well, if you listen to Angie the family is still ”healing”. After eight years either the therapy isn’t working or her mothering is not working.

Even when talking about her play The Outsiders, she claims it’s about “family”.

I think those damaged kids will never get out of therapy. It will be like exiting a cult to gain independence.

Not as long as their f ed up mother is controlling the therapy process. Text book child estrangement. I used to like her, however the longer this dragged out the more I realized her substantial role in the demise of that relationship/marriage. It's the using of the children I cannot ignore, shame on her.

I find this thread so peculiar. Anytime anyone comes in here questioning the narrative you all have about her its like 'UNHINGED JOLIE FANS CAN'T SEE HER FLAWS SHE'S A SUCCUBI THAT STOLE HIS CHILDREN AND STOLE HIM TOO CAN'T YOU SEE' but then you all go on for pages and pages with comments like this.

I think that with this marriage, like with every marriage, the only people who REALLY know what happened are the two people involved. And rarely if ever is only ONE person to fault for the state of a marriage. But if anyone is bending over backwards to paint a narrative here, its the people who hate her

- a fairly neutral observer who has been reading this thread occasionally as it has popped up over the months

Oh I guess you conveniently glossed over all those angry posts accusing Brad of being an angry drunk and terrible father. While he may have had his moments, Angelina is no saint either, but some people are just as blind to that reality as well. So, your "neutrality" is dishonest.

I didn't gloss over anything. I said you outnumber them. By like, a lot. I didn't take either of their sides, this is just my observation of the participants of this thread.

Who has been simply questioning the narrative? It's been a lot of accusations about people who happen to think Pitt is more sympathetic. And if it seems like more people are on his side, then maybe there's a reason? The Angelina fans haven't really explained why they thinks she's infallible or innocent. Then there are the weird Zahara fan club posters who keep trying to insert her into this when she's quietly living her life, out of the public eye.

"more people" when it's most certainly been one person who has kept the same energy from the beginning of the thread. "Zahara fan club posters" says it all really.

One person? Hardly. Why is Zahara mentioned repeatedly in here? It's weird.

Ok.

So it must be you. There are 5 other kids. Nobody even mentions the twins. Shiloh was in the news for her name change so it's odd that Zahara is mentioned constantly while not being in the new for anything.

The other kids have been mentioned. Zahara is being mentioned now since someone's team skipped over her. Zahara was heavily mentioned in the beginning because you had an unhinged reaction at people being happy for her. That's when I dipped and I see nothing has changed.

What are you talking about a team skipped over her? The statement about being happy for a daughter and Shiloh's birth being the happiest day of his life? That statement skips over everyone. Brad's happiest day wasn't the birth of any of his other children? The day any of them were adopted? His wedding day? Any other day in his life? It wasn't about Zahara but someone seems desperate to try to make that connection. It seems like a stupid poorly though out statement that likely isn't even true. Imagine if your dad said the happiest day was the day your sibling was born and not you? That would rub any kid the wrong way. That's why I don't even believe he said that or thinks it.

If he said it was the happiest day of his life because he always wanted a daughter then that is in fact a very effed up thing to put out into the public sphere as it does exclude a daughter he had adopted prior to Shilohs birth. Zahara is RELEVANT in this context.

People excoriated Chris Pratt for much less

Thank you! There was a reason he has been getting dragged because of that comment. Adopted kids already face enough discrimination. People, even in this thread were hoping it would be a adopted vs bio kid situation. He knows better than that and so does his PR team.

Again. He has two younger kids, no concern for them?. I guess you think they don't exist or something. But since he doesn't have a history of fighting with tabloids he and all the family are probably just ignoring this for the tabloid trash it is.

Again, by the time they Vivienne was born he already had Shiloh and Zahara so it would be absurd to say “I was happy because I always wanted a daughter.”

He would have said, that was a happy day because I always wanted a house full of ladies” or something. Something that clearly implies she was not the first girl.

Saying “I always wanted a daughter” implies that until that point you did not have one. But he did. Zahara. So it is insulting to her in a unique way. Because time is linear. And you are not very bright.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad hasn’t responded to Angelina’s low blow of having Shiloh file to legally change her last name. I think he is used to her tactics by now and expects it. He needs to continue to rise above her pettiness.

One of the few statements he’s made about her personality, through court papers, is that she has no self-regulating mechanism. I’m sure not much surprises him at this point. It was said he was always worried about her not eating and that she would lock herself in her room for days at a time.

So then he should’ve gotten a divorce like he did to his first wife. Instead he got sloshed and assaulted a bunch of family members on a plane.

The story keeps changing. Now it's a bunch of family members@

The story was retracted and sealed. More details coming out doesn’t mean it's changing.

It was already investigated and no charges filed. This reeks of desperation on the part of Angelina because she can't control the narrative.

Well, if you listen to Angie the family is still ”healing”. After eight years either the therapy isn’t working or her mothering is not working.

Even when talking about her play The Outsiders, she claims it’s about “family”.

I think those damaged kids will never get out of therapy. It will be like exiting a cult to gain independence.

Not as long as their f ed up mother is controlling the therapy process. Text book child estrangement. I used to like her, however the longer this dragged out the more I realized her substantial role in the demise of that relationship/marriage. It's the using of the children I cannot ignore, shame on her.

I find this thread so peculiar. Anytime anyone comes in here questioning the narrative you all have about her its like 'UNHINGED JOLIE FANS CAN'T SEE HER FLAWS SHE'S A SUCCUBI THAT STOLE HIS CHILDREN AND STOLE HIM TOO CAN'T YOU SEE' but then you all go on for pages and pages with comments like this.

I think that with this marriage, like with every marriage, the only people who REALLY know what happened are the two people involved. And rarely if ever is only ONE person to fault for the state of a marriage. But if anyone is bending over backwards to paint a narrative here, its the people who hate her

- a fairly neutral observer who has been reading this thread occasionally as it has popped up over the months

Oh I guess you conveniently glossed over all those angry posts accusing Brad of being an angry drunk and terrible father. While he may have had his moments, Angelina is no saint either, but some people are just as blind to that reality as well. So, your "neutrality" is dishonest.

I didn't gloss over anything. I said you outnumber them. By like, a lot. I didn't take either of their sides, this is just my observation of the participants of this thread.

Who has been simply questioning the narrative? It's been a lot of accusations about people who happen to think Pitt is more sympathetic. And if it seems like more people are on his side, then maybe there's a reason? The Angelina fans haven't really explained why they thinks she's infallible or innocent. Then there are the weird Zahara fan club posters who keep trying to insert her into this when she's quietly living her life, out of the public eye.

"more people" when it's most certainly been one person who has kept the same energy from the beginning of the thread. "Zahara fan club posters" says it all really.

One person? Hardly. Why is Zahara mentioned repeatedly in here? It's weird.

Ok.

So it must be you. There are 5 other kids. Nobody even mentions the twins. Shiloh was in the news for her name change so it's odd that Zahara is mentioned constantly while not being in the new for anything.

The other kids have been mentioned. Zahara is being mentioned now since someone's team skipped over her. Zahara was heavily mentioned in the beginning because you had an unhinged reaction at people being happy for her. That's when I dipped and I see nothing has changed.

What are you talking about a team skipped over her? The statement about being happy for a daughter and Shiloh's birth being the happiest day of his life? That statement skips over everyone. Brad's happiest day wasn't the birth of any of his other children? The day any of them were adopted? His wedding day? Any other day in his life? It wasn't about Zahara but someone seems desperate to try to make that connection. It seems like a stupid poorly though out statement that likely isn't even true. Imagine if your dad said the happiest day was the day your sibling was born and not you? That would rub any kid the wrong way. That's why I don't even believe he said that or thinks it.

If he said it was the happiest day of his life because he always wanted a daughter then that is in fact a very effed up thing to put out into the public sphere as it does exclude a daughter he had adopted prior to Shilohs birth. Zahara is RELEVANT in this context.

People excoriated Chris Pratt for much less

Thank you! There was a reason he has been getting dragged because of that comment. Adopted kids already face enough discrimination. People, even in this thread were hoping it would be a adopted vs bio kid situation. He knows better than that and so does his PR team.

Again. He has two younger kids, no concern for them?. I guess you think they don't exist or something. But since he doesn't have a history of fighting with tabloids he and all the family are probably just ignoring this for the tabloid trash it is.

You're purposefully missing the point. Like other celebs Brad's team has had People magazine take qoutes out in the past as well. This should have been change. This is not random star magazine. You know that because you were arguing the "source close to Jolie" meant it was coming from her team. You only changed your stance because you didn't realize Brad's article said the same thing before someone told you.

Yes, but as demonstrated with the Meghan Markel case she denied she gave her 5 friends permission to speak to People. So, sometimes they aren't coming from "the team". That is the crux of her lawsuit. Reconcile that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad hasn’t responded to Angelina’s low blow of having Shiloh file to legally change her last name. I think he is used to her tactics by now and expects it. He needs to continue to rise above her pettiness.

One of the few statements he’s made about her personality, through court papers, is that she has no self-regulating mechanism. I’m sure not much surprises him at this point. It was said he was always worried about her not eating and that she would lock herself in her room for days at a time.

So then he should’ve gotten a divorce like he did to his first wife. Instead he got sloshed and assaulted a bunch of family members on a plane.

The story keeps changing. Now it's a bunch of family members@

The story was retracted and sealed. More details coming out doesn’t mean it's changing.

It was already investigated and no charges filed. This reeks of desperation on the part of Angelina because she can't control the narrative.

Well, if you listen to Angie the family is still ”healing”. After eight years either the therapy isn’t working or her mothering is not working.

Even when talking about her play The Outsiders, she claims it’s about “family”.

I think those damaged kids will never get out of therapy. It will be like exiting a cult to gain independence.

Not as long as their f ed up mother is controlling the therapy process. Text book child estrangement. I used to like her, however the longer this dragged out the more I realized her substantial role in the demise of that relationship/marriage. It's the using of the children I cannot ignore, shame on her.

I find this thread so peculiar. Anytime anyone comes in here questioning the narrative you all have about her its like 'UNHINGED JOLIE FANS CAN'T SEE HER FLAWS SHE'S A SUCCUBI THAT STOLE HIS CHILDREN AND STOLE HIM TOO CAN'T YOU SEE' but then you all go on for pages and pages with comments like this.

I think that with this marriage, like with every marriage, the only people who REALLY know what happened are the two people involved. And rarely if ever is only ONE person to fault for the state of a marriage. But if anyone is bending over backwards to paint a narrative here, its the people who hate her

- a fairly neutral observer who has been reading this thread occasionally as it has popped up over the months

Oh I guess you conveniently glossed over all those angry posts accusing Brad of being an angry drunk and terrible father. While he may have had his moments, Angelina is no saint either, but some people are just as blind to that reality as well. So, your "neutrality" is dishonest.

I didn't gloss over anything. I said you outnumber them. By like, a lot. I didn't take either of their sides, this is just my observation of the participants of this thread.

Who has been simply questioning the narrative? It's been a lot of accusations about people who happen to think Pitt is more sympathetic. And if it seems like more people are on his side, then maybe there's a reason? The Angelina fans haven't really explained why they thinks she's infallible or innocent. Then there are the weird Zahara fan club posters who keep trying to insert her into this when she's quietly living her life, out of the public eye.

"more people" when it's most certainly been one person who has kept the same energy from the beginning of the thread. "Zahara fan club posters" says it all really.

One person? Hardly. Why is Zahara mentioned repeatedly in here? It's weird.

Ok.

So it must be you. There are 5 other kids. Nobody even mentions the twins. Shiloh was in the news for her name change so it's odd that Zahara is mentioned constantly while not being in the new for anything.

The other kids have been mentioned. Zahara is being mentioned now since someone's team skipped over her. Zahara was heavily mentioned in the beginning because you had an unhinged reaction at people being happy for her. That's when I dipped and I see nothing has changed.

What are you talking about a team skipped over her? The statement about being happy for a daughter and Shiloh's birth being the happiest day of his life? That statement skips over everyone. Brad's happiest day wasn't the birth of any of his other children? The day any of them were adopted? His wedding day? Any other day in his life? It wasn't about Zahara but someone seems desperate to try to make that connection. It seems like a stupid poorly though out statement that likely isn't even true. Imagine if your dad said the happiest day was the day your sibling was born and not you? That would rub any kid the wrong way. That's why I don't even believe he said that or thinks it.

If he said it was the happiest day of his life because he always wanted a daughter then that is in fact a very effed up thing to put out into the public sphere as it does exclude a daughter he had adopted prior to Shilohs birth. Zahara is RELEVANT in this context.

People excoriated Chris Pratt for much less

Thank you! There was a reason he has been getting dragged because of that comment. Adopted kids already face enough discrimination. People, even in this thread were hoping it would be a adopted vs bio kid situation. He knows better than that and so does his PR team.

Again. He has two younger kids, no concern for them?. I guess you think they don't exist or something. But since he doesn't have a history of fighting with tabloids he and all the family are probably just ignoring this for the tabloid trash it is.

Again, by the time they Vivienne was born he already had Shiloh and Zahara so it would be absurd to say “I was happy because I always wanted a daughter.”

He would have said, that was a happy day because I always wanted a house full of ladies” or something. Something that clearly implies she was not the first girl.

Saying “I always wanted a daughter” implies that until that point you did not have one. But he did. Zahara. So it is insulting to her in a unique way. Because time is linear. And you are not very bright.

If you're going to take the statement literally, you can't cherry pick which parts to obsess over. He also dissed his other kids, and another daughter, after the birth of Shiloh. You're selectively choosing which parts to focus on and disregarding the rest which invalidates your concern.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad hasn’t responded to Angelina’s low blow of having Shiloh file to legally change her last name. I think he is used to her tactics by now and expects it. He needs to continue to rise above her pettiness.

One of the few statements he’s made about her personality, through court papers, is that she has no self-regulating mechanism. I’m sure not much surprises him at this point. It was said he was always worried about her not eating and that she would lock herself in her room for days at a time.

So then he should’ve gotten a divorce like he did to his first wife. Instead he got sloshed and assaulted a bunch of family members on a plane.

The story keeps changing. Now it's a bunch of family members@

The story was retracted and sealed. More details coming out doesn’t mean it's changing.

It was already investigated and no charges filed. This reeks of desperation on the part of Angelina because she can't control the narrative.

Well, if you listen to Angie the family is still ”healing”. After eight years either the therapy isn’t working or her mothering is not working.

Even when talking about her play The Outsiders, she claims it’s about “family”.

I think those damaged kids will never get out of therapy. It will be like exiting a cult to gain independence.

Not as long as their f ed up mother is controlling the therapy process. Text book child estrangement. I used to like her, however the longer this dragged out the more I realized her substantial role in the demise of that relationship/marriage. It's the using of the children I cannot ignore, shame on her.

I find this thread so peculiar. Anytime anyone comes in here questioning the narrative you all have about her its like 'UNHINGED JOLIE FANS CAN'T SEE HER FLAWS SHE'S A SUCCUBI THAT STOLE HIS CHILDREN AND STOLE HIM TOO CAN'T YOU SEE' but then you all go on for pages and pages with comments like this.

I think that with this marriage, like with every marriage, the only people who REALLY know what happened are the two people involved. And rarely if ever is only ONE person to fault for the state of a marriage. But if anyone is bending over backwards to paint a narrative here, its the people who hate her

- a fairly neutral observer who has been reading this thread occasionally as it has popped up over the months

Oh I guess you conveniently glossed over all those angry posts accusing Brad of being an angry drunk and terrible father. While he may have had his moments, Angelina is no saint either, but some people are just as blind to that reality as well. So, your "neutrality" is dishonest.

I didn't gloss over anything. I said you outnumber them. By like, a lot. I didn't take either of their sides, this is just my observation of the participants of this thread.

Who has been simply questioning the narrative? It's been a lot of accusations about people who happen to think Pitt is more sympathetic. And if it seems like more people are on his side, then maybe there's a reason? The Angelina fans haven't really explained why they thinks she's infallible or innocent. Then there are the weird Zahara fan club posters who keep trying to insert her into this when she's quietly living her life, out of the public eye.

"more people" when it's most certainly been one person who has kept the same energy from the beginning of the thread. "Zahara fan club posters" says it all really.

One person? Hardly. Why is Zahara mentioned repeatedly in here? It's weird.

Ok.

So it must be you. There are 5 other kids. Nobody even mentions the twins. Shiloh was in the news for her name change so it's odd that Zahara is mentioned constantly while not being in the new for anything.

The other kids have been mentioned. Zahara is being mentioned now since someone's team skipped over her. Zahara was heavily mentioned in the beginning because you had an unhinged reaction at people being happy for her. That's when I dipped and I see nothing has changed.

What are you talking about a team skipped over her? The statement about being happy for a daughter and Shiloh's birth being the happiest day of his life? That statement skips over everyone. Brad's happiest day wasn't the birth of any of his other children? The day any of them were adopted? His wedding day? Any other day in his life? It wasn't about Zahara but someone seems desperate to try to make that connection. It seems like a stupid poorly though out statement that likely isn't even true. Imagine if your dad said the happiest day was the day your sibling was born and not you? That would rub any kid the wrong way. That's why I don't even believe he said that or thinks it.

If he said it was the happiest day of his life because he always wanted a daughter then that is in fact a very effed up thing to put out into the public sphere as it does exclude a daughter he had adopted prior to Shilohs birth. Zahara is RELEVANT in this context.

People excoriated Chris Pratt for much less

Thank you! There was a reason he has been getting dragged because of that comment. Adopted kids already face enough discrimination. People, even in this thread were hoping it would be a adopted vs bio kid situation. He knows better than that and so does his PR team.

Again. He has two younger kids, no concern for them?. I guess you think they don't exist or something. But since he doesn't have a history of fighting with tabloids he and all the family are probably just ignoring this for the tabloid trash it is.

Again, by the time they Vivienne was born he already had Shiloh and Zahara so it would be absurd to say “I was happy because I always wanted a daughter.”

He would have said, that was a happy day because I always wanted a house full of ladies” or something. Something that clearly implies she was not the first girl.

Saying “I always wanted a daughter” implies that until that point you did not have one. But he did. Zahara. So it is insulting to her in a unique way. Because time is linear. And you are not very bright.

If you're going to take the statement literally, you can't cherry pick which parts to obsess over. He also dissed his other kids, and another daughter, after the birth of Shiloh. You're selectively choosing which parts to focus on and disregarding the rest which invalidates your concern.

If you cannot understand this I don’t have hope for your interpersonal relationships

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad hasn’t responded to Angelina’s low blow of having Shiloh file to legally change her last name. I think he is used to her tactics by now and expects it. He needs to continue to rise above her pettiness.

One of the few statements he’s made about her personality, through court papers, is that she has no self-regulating mechanism. I’m sure not much surprises him at this point. It was said he was always worried about her not eating and that she would lock herself in her room for days at a time.

So then he should’ve gotten a divorce like he did to his first wife. Instead he got sloshed and assaulted a bunch of family members on a plane.

The story keeps changing. Now it's a bunch of family members@

The story was retracted and sealed. More details coming out doesn’t mean it's changing.

It was already investigated and no charges filed. This reeks of desperation on the part of Angelina because she can't control the narrative.

Well, if you listen to Angie the family is still ”healing”. After eight years either the therapy isn’t working or her mothering is not working.

Even when talking about her play The Outsiders, she claims it’s about “family”.

I think those damaged kids will never get out of therapy. It will be like exiting a cult to gain independence.

Not as long as their f ed up mother is controlling the therapy process. Text book child estrangement. I used to like her, however the longer this dragged out the more I realized her substantial role in the demise of that relationship/marriage. It's the using of the children I cannot ignore, shame on her.

I find this thread so peculiar. Anytime anyone comes in here questioning the narrative you all have about her its like 'UNHINGED JOLIE FANS CAN'T SEE HER FLAWS SHE'S A SUCCUBI THAT STOLE HIS CHILDREN AND STOLE HIM TOO CAN'T YOU SEE' but then you all go on for pages and pages with comments like this.

I think that with this marriage, like with every marriage, the only people who REALLY know what happened are the two people involved. And rarely if ever is only ONE person to fault for the state of a marriage. But if anyone is bending over backwards to paint a narrative here, its the people who hate her

- a fairly neutral observer who has been reading this thread occasionally as it has popped up over the months

Oh I guess you conveniently glossed over all those angry posts accusing Brad of being an angry drunk and terrible father. While he may have had his moments, Angelina is no saint either, but some people are just as blind to that reality as well. So, your "neutrality" is dishonest.

I didn't gloss over anything. I said you outnumber them. By like, a lot. I didn't take either of their sides, this is just my observation of the participants of this thread.

Who has been simply questioning the narrative? It's been a lot of accusations about people who happen to think Pitt is more sympathetic. And if it seems like more people are on his side, then maybe there's a reason? The Angelina fans haven't really explained why they thinks she's infallible or innocent. Then there are the weird Zahara fan club posters who keep trying to insert her into this when she's quietly living her life, out of the public eye.

"more people" when it's most certainly been one person who has kept the same energy from the beginning of the thread. "Zahara fan club posters" says it all really.

One person? Hardly. Why is Zahara mentioned repeatedly in here? It's weird.

Ok.

So it must be you. There are 5 other kids. Nobody even mentions the twins. Shiloh was in the news for her name change so it's odd that Zahara is mentioned constantly while not being in the new for anything.

The other kids have been mentioned. Zahara is being mentioned now since someone's team skipped over her. Zahara was heavily mentioned in the beginning because you had an unhinged reaction at people being happy for her. That's when I dipped and I see nothing has changed.

What are you talking about a team skipped over her? The statement about being happy for a daughter and Shiloh's birth being the happiest day of his life? That statement skips over everyone. Brad's happiest day wasn't the birth of any of his other children? The day any of them were adopted? His wedding day? Any other day in his life? It wasn't about Zahara but someone seems desperate to try to make that connection. It seems like a stupid poorly though out statement that likely isn't even true. Imagine if your dad said the happiest day was the day your sibling was born and not you? That would rub any kid the wrong way. That's why I don't even believe he said that or thinks it.

If he said it was the happiest day of his life because he always wanted a daughter then that is in fact a very effed up thing to put out into the public sphere as it does exclude a daughter he had adopted prior to Shilohs birth. Zahara is RELEVANT in this context.

People excoriated Chris Pratt for much less

Thank you! There was a reason he has been getting dragged because of that comment. Adopted kids already face enough discrimination. People, even in this thread were hoping it would be a adopted vs bio kid situation. He knows better than that and so does his PR team.

Again. He has two younger kids, no concern for them?. I guess you think they don't exist or something. But since he doesn't have a history of fighting with tabloids he and all the family are probably just ignoring this for the tabloid trash it is.

You're purposefully missing the point. Like other celebs Brad's team has had People magazine take qoutes out in the past as well. This should have been change. This is not random star magazine. You know that because you were arguing the "source close to Jolie" meant it was coming from her team. You only changed your stance because you didn't realize Brad's article said the same thing before someone told you.

Yes, but as demonstrated with the Meghan Markel case she denied she gave her 5 friends permission to speak to People. So, sometimes they aren't coming from "the team". That is the crux of her lawsuit. Reconcile that.

Skilled troll move! Adding in MM after subtly disregarding Zahara for pages. What is the rest of your life outside dcum like?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad hasn’t responded to Angelina’s low blow of having Shiloh file to legally change her last name. I think he is used to her tactics by now and expects it. He needs to continue to rise above her pettiness.

One of the few statements he’s made about her personality, through court papers, is that she has no self-regulating mechanism. I’m sure not much surprises him at this point. It was said he was always worried about her not eating and that she would lock herself in her room for days at a time.

So then he should’ve gotten a divorce like he did to his first wife. Instead he got sloshed and assaulted a bunch of family members on a plane.

The story keeps changing. Now it's a bunch of family members@

The story was retracted and sealed. More details coming out doesn’t mean it's changing.

It was already investigated and no charges filed. This reeks of desperation on the part of Angelina because she can't control the narrative.

Well, if you listen to Angie the family is still ”healing”. After eight years either the therapy isn’t working or her mothering is not working.

Even when talking about her play The Outsiders, she claims it’s about “family”.

I think those damaged kids will never get out of therapy. It will be like exiting a cult to gain independence.

Not as long as their f ed up mother is controlling the therapy process. Text book child estrangement. I used to like her, however the longer this dragged out the more I realized her substantial role in the demise of that relationship/marriage. It's the using of the children I cannot ignore, shame on her.

I find this thread so peculiar. Anytime anyone comes in here questioning the narrative you all have about her its like 'UNHINGED JOLIE FANS CAN'T SEE HER FLAWS SHE'S A SUCCUBI THAT STOLE HIS CHILDREN AND STOLE HIM TOO CAN'T YOU SEE' but then you all go on for pages and pages with comments like this.

I think that with this marriage, like with every marriage, the only people who REALLY know what happened are the two people involved. And rarely if ever is only ONE person to fault for the state of a marriage. But if anyone is bending over backwards to paint a narrative here, its the people who hate her

- a fairly neutral observer who has been reading this thread occasionally as it has popped up over the months

Oh I guess you conveniently glossed over all those angry posts accusing Brad of being an angry drunk and terrible father. While he may have had his moments, Angelina is no saint either, but some people are just as blind to that reality as well. So, your "neutrality" is dishonest.

I didn't gloss over anything. I said you outnumber them. By like, a lot. I didn't take either of their sides, this is just my observation of the participants of this thread.

Who has been simply questioning the narrative? It's been a lot of accusations about people who happen to think Pitt is more sympathetic. And if it seems like more people are on his side, then maybe there's a reason? The Angelina fans haven't really explained why they thinks she's infallible or innocent. Then there are the weird Zahara fan club posters who keep trying to insert her into this when she's quietly living her life, out of the public eye.

"more people" when it's most certainly been one person who has kept the same energy from the beginning of the thread. "Zahara fan club posters" says it all really.

One person? Hardly. Why is Zahara mentioned repeatedly in here? It's weird.

Ok.

So it must be you. There are 5 other kids. Nobody even mentions the twins. Shiloh was in the news for her name change so it's odd that Zahara is mentioned constantly while not being in the new for anything.

The other kids have been mentioned. Zahara is being mentioned now since someone's team skipped over her. Zahara was heavily mentioned in the beginning because you had an unhinged reaction at people being happy for her. That's when I dipped and I see nothing has changed.

What are you talking about a team skipped over her? The statement about being happy for a daughter and Shiloh's birth being the happiest day of his life? That statement skips over everyone. Brad's happiest day wasn't the birth of any of his other children? The day any of them were adopted? His wedding day? Any other day in his life? It wasn't about Zahara but someone seems desperate to try to make that connection. It seems like a stupid poorly though out statement that likely isn't even true. Imagine if your dad said the happiest day was the day your sibling was born and not you? That would rub any kid the wrong way. That's why I don't even believe he said that or thinks it.

If he said it was the happiest day of his life because he always wanted a daughter then that is in fact a very effed up thing to put out into the public sphere as it does exclude a daughter he had adopted prior to Shilohs birth. Zahara is RELEVANT in this context.

People excoriated Chris Pratt for much less

Thank you! There was a reason he has been getting dragged because of that comment. Adopted kids already face enough discrimination. People, even in this thread were hoping it would be a adopted vs bio kid situation. He knows better than that and so does his PR team.

Again. He has two younger kids, no concern for them?. I guess you think they don't exist or something. But since he doesn't have a history of fighting with tabloids he and all the family are probably just ignoring this for the tabloid trash it is.

Again, by the time they Vivienne was born he already had Shiloh and Zahara so it would be absurd to say “I was happy because I always wanted a daughter.”

He would have said, that was a happy day because I always wanted a house full of ladies” or something. Something that clearly implies she was not the first girl.

Saying “I always wanted a daughter” implies that until that point you did not have one. But he did. Zahara. So it is insulting to her in a unique way. Because time is linear. And you are not very bright.

If you're going to take the statement literally, you can't cherry pick which parts to obsess over. He also dissed his other kids, and another daughter, after the birth of Shiloh. You're selectively choosing which parts to focus on and disregarding the rest which invalidates your concern.

This doesn't make any sense and it doesn't invalidate their concern. You're once again grasping straws using a strawman argument as they said. At the end of the day he purposefully skipped over counting Zahara his oldest daughter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad hasn’t responded to Angelina’s low blow of having Shiloh file to legally change her last name. I think he is used to her tactics by now and expects it. He needs to continue to rise above her pettiness.

One of the few statements he’s made about her personality, through court papers, is that she has no self-regulating mechanism. I’m sure not much surprises him at this point. It was said he was always worried about her not eating and that she would lock herself in her room for days at a time.

So then he should’ve gotten a divorce like he did to his first wife. Instead he got sloshed and assaulted a bunch of family members on a plane.

The story keeps changing. Now it's a bunch of family members@

The story was retracted and sealed. More details coming out doesn’t mean it's changing.

It was already investigated and no charges filed. This reeks of desperation on the part of Angelina because she can't control the narrative.

Well, if you listen to Angie the family is still ”healing”. After eight years either the therapy isn’t working or her mothering is not working.

Even when talking about her play The Outsiders, she claims it’s about “family”.

I think those damaged kids will never get out of therapy. It will be like exiting a cult to gain independence.

Not as long as their f ed up mother is controlling the therapy process. Text book child estrangement. I used to like her, however the longer this dragged out the more I realized her substantial role in the demise of that relationship/marriage. It's the using of the children I cannot ignore, shame on her.

I find this thread so peculiar. Anytime anyone comes in here questioning the narrative you all have about her its like 'UNHINGED JOLIE FANS CAN'T SEE HER FLAWS SHE'S A SUCCUBI THAT STOLE HIS CHILDREN AND STOLE HIM TOO CAN'T YOU SEE' but then you all go on for pages and pages with comments like this.

I think that with this marriage, like with every marriage, the only people who REALLY know what happened are the two people involved. And rarely if ever is only ONE person to fault for the state of a marriage. But if anyone is bending over backwards to paint a narrative here, its the people who hate her

- a fairly neutral observer who has been reading this thread occasionally as it has popped up over the months

Oh I guess you conveniently glossed over all those angry posts accusing Brad of being an angry drunk and terrible father. While he may have had his moments, Angelina is no saint either, but some people are just as blind to that reality as well. So, your "neutrality" is dishonest.

I didn't gloss over anything. I said you outnumber them. By like, a lot. I didn't take either of their sides, this is just my observation of the participants of this thread.

Who has been simply questioning the narrative? It's been a lot of accusations about people who happen to think Pitt is more sympathetic. And if it seems like more people are on his side, then maybe there's a reason? The Angelina fans haven't really explained why they thinks she's infallible or innocent. Then there are the weird Zahara fan club posters who keep trying to insert her into this when she's quietly living her life, out of the public eye.

"more people" when it's most certainly been one person who has kept the same energy from the beginning of the thread. "Zahara fan club posters" says it all really.

One person? Hardly. Why is Zahara mentioned repeatedly in here? It's weird.

Ok.

So it must be you. There are 5 other kids. Nobody even mentions the twins. Shiloh was in the news for her name change so it's odd that Zahara is mentioned constantly while not being in the new for anything.

The other kids have been mentioned. Zahara is being mentioned now since someone's team skipped over her. Zahara was heavily mentioned in the beginning because you had an unhinged reaction at people being happy for her. That's when I dipped and I see nothing has changed.

What are you talking about a team skipped over her? The statement about being happy for a daughter and Shiloh's birth being the happiest day of his life? That statement skips over everyone. Brad's happiest day wasn't the birth of any of his other children? The day any of them were adopted? His wedding day? Any other day in his life? It wasn't about Zahara but someone seems desperate to try to make that connection. It seems like a stupid poorly though out statement that likely isn't even true. Imagine if your dad said the happiest day was the day your sibling was born and not you? That would rub any kid the wrong way. That's why I don't even believe he said that or thinks it.

If he said it was the happiest day of his life because he always wanted a daughter then that is in fact a very effed up thing to put out into the public sphere as it does exclude a daughter he had adopted prior to Shilohs birth. Zahara is RELEVANT in this context.

People excoriated Chris Pratt for much less

Thank you! There was a reason he has been getting dragged because of that comment. Adopted kids already face enough discrimination. People, even in this thread were hoping it would be a adopted vs bio kid situation. He knows better than that and so does his PR team.

Again. He has two younger kids, no concern for them?. I guess you think they don't exist or something. But since he doesn't have a history of fighting with tabloids he and all the family are probably just ignoring this for the tabloid trash it is.

You're purposefully missing the point. Like other celebs Brad's team has had People magazine take qoutes out in the past as well. This should have been change. This is not random star magazine. You know that because you were arguing the "source close to Jolie" meant it was coming from her team. You only changed your stance because you didn't realize Brad's article said the same thing before someone told you.

Yes, but as demonstrated with the Meghan Markel case she denied she gave her 5 friends permission to speak to People. So, sometimes they aren't coming from "the team". That is the crux of her lawsuit. Reconcile that.

Skilled troll move! Adding in MM after subtly disregarding Zahara for pages. What is the rest of your life outside dcum like?

What is their obsession with meghan markle 😭

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad hasn’t responded to Angelina’s low blow of having Shiloh file to legally change her last name. I think he is used to her tactics by now and expects it. He needs to continue to rise above her pettiness.

One of the few statements he’s made about her personality, through court papers, is that she has no self-regulating mechanism. I’m sure not much surprises him at this point. It was said he was always worried about her not eating and that she would lock herself in her room for days at a time.

So then he should’ve gotten a divorce like he did to his first wife. Instead he got sloshed and assaulted a bunch of family members on a plane.

The story keeps changing. Now it's a bunch of family members@

The story was retracted and sealed. More details coming out doesn’t mean it's changing.

It was already investigated and no charges filed. This reeks of desperation on the part of Angelina because she can't control the narrative.

Well, if you listen to Angie the family is still ”healing”. After eight years either the therapy isn’t working or her mothering is not working.

Even when talking about her play The Outsiders, she claims it’s about “family”.

I think those damaged kids will never get out of therapy. It will be like exiting a cult to gain independence.

Not as long as their f ed up mother is controlling the therapy process. Text book child estrangement. I used to like her, however the longer this dragged out the more I realized her substantial role in the demise of that relationship/marriage. It's the using of the children I cannot ignore, shame on her.

I find this thread so peculiar. Anytime anyone comes in here questioning the narrative you all have about her its like 'UNHINGED JOLIE FANS CAN'T SEE HER FLAWS SHE'S A SUCCUBI THAT STOLE HIS CHILDREN AND STOLE HIM TOO CAN'T YOU SEE' but then you all go on for pages and pages with comments like this.

I think that with this marriage, like with every marriage, the only people who REALLY know what happened are the two people involved. And rarely if ever is only ONE person to fault for the state of a marriage. But if anyone is bending over backwards to paint a narrative here, its the people who hate her

- a fairly neutral observer who has been reading this thread occasionally as it has popped up over the months

Oh I guess you conveniently glossed over all those angry posts accusing Brad of being an angry drunk and terrible father. While he may have had his moments, Angelina is no saint either, but some people are just as blind to that reality as well. So, your "neutrality" is dishonest.

I didn't gloss over anything. I said you outnumber them. By like, a lot. I didn't take either of their sides, this is just my observation of the participants of this thread.

Who has been simply questioning the narrative? It's been a lot of accusations about people who happen to think Pitt is more sympathetic. And if it seems like more people are on his side, then maybe there's a reason? The Angelina fans haven't really explained why they thinks she's infallible or innocent. Then there are the weird Zahara fan club posters who keep trying to insert her into this when she's quietly living her life, out of the public eye.

"more people" when it's most certainly been one person who has kept the same energy from the beginning of the thread. "Zahara fan club posters" says it all really.

One person? Hardly. Why is Zahara mentioned repeatedly in here? It's weird.

Ok.

So it must be you. There are 5 other kids. Nobody even mentions the twins. Shiloh was in the news for her name change so it's odd that Zahara is mentioned constantly while not being in the new for anything.

The other kids have been mentioned. Zahara is being mentioned now since someone's team skipped over her. Zahara was heavily mentioned in the beginning because you had an unhinged reaction at people being happy for her. That's when I dipped and I see nothing has changed.

What are you talking about a team skipped over her? The statement about being happy for a daughter and Shiloh's birth being the happiest day of his life? That statement skips over everyone. Brad's happiest day wasn't the birth of any of his other children? The day any of them were adopted? His wedding day? Any other day in his life? It wasn't about Zahara but someone seems desperate to try to make that connection. It seems like a stupid poorly though out statement that likely isn't even true. Imagine if your dad said the happiest day was the day your sibling was born and not you? That would rub any kid the wrong way. That's why I don't even believe he said that or thinks it.

If he said it was the happiest day of his life because he always wanted a daughter then that is in fact a very effed up thing to put out into the public sphere as it does exclude a daughter he had adopted prior to Shilohs birth. Zahara is RELEVANT in this context.

People excoriated Chris Pratt for much less

Thank you! There was a reason he has been getting dragged because of that comment. Adopted kids already face enough discrimination. People, even in this thread were hoping it would be a adopted vs bio kid situation. He knows better than that and so does his PR team.

Again. He has two younger kids, no concern for them?. I guess you think they don't exist or something. But since he doesn't have a history of fighting with tabloids he and all the family are probably just ignoring this for the tabloid trash it is.

You're purposefully missing the point. Like other celebs Brad's team has had People magazine take qoutes out in the past as well. This should have been change. This is not random star magazine. You know that because you were arguing the "source close to Jolie" meant it was coming from her team. You only changed your stance because you didn't realize Brad's article said the same thing before someone told you.

Yes, but as demonstrated with the Meghan Markel case she denied she gave her 5 friends permission to speak to People. So, sometimes they aren't coming from "the team". That is the crux of her lawsuit. Reconcile that.

Skilled troll move! Adding in MM after subtly disregarding Zahara for pages. What is the rest of your life outside dcum like?

You're a joke. If you want to take the comment literally, then presumably this "source" hasn't talked to Brad in 18 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad hasn’t responded to Angelina’s low blow of having Shiloh file to legally change her last name. I think he is used to her tactics by now and expects it. He needs to continue to rise above her pettiness.

One of the few statements he’s made about her personality, through court papers, is that she has no self-regulating mechanism. I’m sure not much surprises him at this point. It was said he was always worried about her not eating and that she would lock herself in her room for days at a time.

So then he should’ve gotten a divorce like he did to his first wife. Instead he got sloshed and assaulted a bunch of family members on a plane.

The story keeps changing. Now it's a bunch of family members@

The story was retracted and sealed. More details coming out doesn’t mean it's changing.

It was already investigated and no charges filed. This reeks of desperation on the part of Angelina because she can't control the narrative.

Well, if you listen to Angie the family is still ”healing”. After eight years either the therapy isn’t working or her mothering is not working.

Even when talking about her play The Outsiders, she claims it’s about “family”.

I think those damaged kids will never get out of therapy. It will be like exiting a cult to gain independence.

Not as long as their f ed up mother is controlling the therapy process. Text book child estrangement. I used to like her, however the longer this dragged out the more I realized her substantial role in the demise of that relationship/marriage. It's the using of the children I cannot ignore, shame on her.

I find this thread so peculiar. Anytime anyone comes in here questioning the narrative you all have about her its like 'UNHINGED JOLIE FANS CAN'T SEE HER FLAWS SHE'S A SUCCUBI THAT STOLE HIS CHILDREN AND STOLE HIM TOO CAN'T YOU SEE' but then you all go on for pages and pages with comments like this.

I think that with this marriage, like with every marriage, the only people who REALLY know what happened are the two people involved. And rarely if ever is only ONE person to fault for the state of a marriage. But if anyone is bending over backwards to paint a narrative here, its the people who hate her

- a fairly neutral observer who has been reading this thread occasionally as it has popped up over the months

Oh I guess you conveniently glossed over all those angry posts accusing Brad of being an angry drunk and terrible father. While he may have had his moments, Angelina is no saint either, but some people are just as blind to that reality as well. So, your "neutrality" is dishonest.

I didn't gloss over anything. I said you outnumber them. By like, a lot. I didn't take either of their sides, this is just my observation of the participants of this thread.

Who has been simply questioning the narrative? It's been a lot of accusations about people who happen to think Pitt is more sympathetic. And if it seems like more people are on his side, then maybe there's a reason? The Angelina fans haven't really explained why they thinks she's infallible or innocent. Then there are the weird Zahara fan club posters who keep trying to insert her into this when she's quietly living her life, out of the public eye.

"more people" when it's most certainly been one person who has kept the same energy from the beginning of the thread. "Zahara fan club posters" says it all really.

One person? Hardly. Why is Zahara mentioned repeatedly in here? It's weird.

Ok.

So it must be you. There are 5 other kids. Nobody even mentions the twins. Shiloh was in the news for her name change so it's odd that Zahara is mentioned constantly while not being in the new for anything.

The other kids have been mentioned. Zahara is being mentioned now since someone's team skipped over her. Zahara was heavily mentioned in the beginning because you had an unhinged reaction at people being happy for her. That's when I dipped and I see nothing has changed.

What are you talking about a team skipped over her? The statement about being happy for a daughter and Shiloh's birth being the happiest day of his life? That statement skips over everyone. Brad's happiest day wasn't the birth of any of his other children? The day any of them were adopted? His wedding day? Any other day in his life? It wasn't about Zahara but someone seems desperate to try to make that connection. It seems like a stupid poorly though out statement that likely isn't even true. Imagine if your dad said the happiest day was the day your sibling was born and not you? That would rub any kid the wrong way. That's why I don't even believe he said that or thinks it.

If he said it was the happiest day of his life because he always wanted a daughter then that is in fact a very effed up thing to put out into the public sphere as it does exclude a daughter he had adopted prior to Shilohs birth. Zahara is RELEVANT in this context.

People excoriated Chris Pratt for much less

Thank you! There was a reason he has been getting dragged because of that comment. Adopted kids already face enough discrimination. People, even in this thread were hoping it would be a adopted vs bio kid situation. He knows better than that and so does his PR team.

Again. He has two younger kids, no concern for them?. I guess you think they don't exist or something. But since he doesn't have a history of fighting with tabloids he and all the family are probably just ignoring this for the tabloid trash it is.

You're purposefully missing the point. Like other celebs Brad's team has had People magazine take qoutes out in the past as well. This should have been change. This is not random star magazine. You know that because you were arguing the "source close to Jolie" meant it was coming from her team. You only changed your stance because you didn't realize Brad's article said the same thing before someone told you.

Yes, but as demonstrated with the Meghan Markel case she denied she gave her 5 friends permission to speak to People. So, sometimes they aren't coming from "the team". That is the crux of her lawsuit. Reconcile that.

Skilled troll move! Adding in MM after subtly disregarding Zahara for pages. What is the rest of your life outside dcum like?

You're a joke. If you want to take the comment literally, then presumably this "source" hasn't talked to Brad in 18 years.

You managed to make a comment that responds to literally nothing at all I said! Impressive!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously who cares about either of them ? They are washed up actors. Even if they were big stars - who cares???

One of them is washed up but not the other. Partly sexism and ageism - but not all of it.

Neither is washed up, at least not yet. Jolie's Callas film is expected to screen in competition at the Venice film festival this year. Pitt's Wolves is expected to screen out of competition. One is obviously more prestigious than the other. If Callas flops, that could be it for Jolie though. She hasn't made a good film in a long time. Pitt works pretty constantly, maybe cares less about prestige now that he has his Oscar. He is still pulling in huge paychecks though.

Angelina won her Oscar in the 90s and stopped caring about what projects she did. Are we forgetting shark tale? Kung fu panda? Callas will get the nomination but I don't know if it will win obviously.

She also took long stretches of time off, at the peak of her career, to have babies or welcome adopted kids into the household. And was the primary when Brad was a barely functional alcoholic who wasn't around much. She made far more professional sacrifices than he did, as is often the way.

Or maybe he was out working to support this very large family along with the 6 nannies-gotta have one for each kid, team of bodyguards, full staff, and private jets. You make it sound like he was just sitting around drunk holding his member while she did everything. She had her moments of instability too that he had to deal with. They were both a mess.

+1 They're both a mess. I have no sympathy for these celebs who think they're entitled to a lavish lifestyle spending millions per year when they can't afford it. Angelina and Harry/Megan Markle could easily afford a still luxurious lifestyle that 99.99% of people could never afford. But nooo, they demand lots of staff, security, private jets etc. so they can go on egomaniacal world tours as self-appointed mouthpieces. No one is entitled to this.

WTF. Meghan and Harry have absolutely nothing to do with this thread. MDS in full swing.

WTF? If you're going to claim People NEVER does this then it seems natural to point out that yes they do. Don't be dense.

It's just weird. You went on a full rant about two people who have a completely different situation. Harry and Meghan are still married which makes it even weirder. Why not choose another divorced couple. Just seemed deranged to me.

DP. But Angie was clearly one of the people that Meghan wants to emulate, in her ambassadorship and philanthropy (and her disdain for acting). Also her profligacy.

This. Angelina, Harry, and Meghan are all known for demanding that other people pay for their over-the-top extravagant lifestyle that they can't afford because they mistakenly feel entitled to it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously who cares about either of them ? They are washed up actors. Even if they were big stars - who cares???

One of them is washed up but not the other. Partly sexism and ageism - but not all of it.

Neither is washed up, at least not yet. Jolie's Callas film is expected to screen in competition at the Venice film festival this year. Pitt's Wolves is expected to screen out of competition. One is obviously more prestigious than the other. If Callas flops, that could be it for Jolie though. She hasn't made a good film in a long time. Pitt works pretty constantly, maybe cares less about prestige now that he has his Oscar. He is still pulling in huge paychecks though.

Angelina won her Oscar in the 90s and stopped caring about what projects she did. Are we forgetting shark tale? Kung fu panda? Callas will get the nomination but I don't know if it will win obviously.

She also took long stretches of time off, at the peak of her career, to have babies or welcome adopted kids into the household. And was the primary when Brad was a barely functional alcoholic who wasn't around much. She made far more professional sacrifices than he did, as is often the way.

Or maybe he was out working to support this very large family along with the 6 nannies-gotta have one for each kid, team of bodyguards, full staff, and private jets. You make it sound like he was just sitting around drunk holding his member while she did everything. She had her moments of instability too that he had to deal with. They were both a mess.

+1 They're both a mess. I have no sympathy for these celebs who think they're entitled to a lavish lifestyle spending millions per year when they can't afford it. Angelina and Harry/Megan Markle could easily afford a still luxurious lifestyle that 99.99% of people could never afford. But nooo, they demand lots of staff, security, private jets etc. so they can go on egomaniacal world tours as self-appointed mouthpieces. No one is entitled to this.

WTF. Meghan and Harry have absolutely nothing to do with this thread. MDS in full swing.

WTF? If you're going to claim People NEVER does this then it seems natural to point out that yes they do. Don't be dense.

It's just weird. You went on a full rant about two people who have a completely different situation. Harry and Meghan are still married which makes it even weirder. Why not choose another divorced couple. Just seemed deranged to me.

DP. But Angie was clearly one of the people that Meghan wants to emulate, in her ambassadorship and philanthropy (and her disdain for acting). Also her profligacy.

This. Angelina, Harry, and Meghan are all known for demanding that other people pay for their over-the-top extravagant lifestyle that they can't afford because they mistakenly feel entitled to it.

Some upthread were trashing Brad’s statement about “enriching” her, which he absolutely did. Not just the winery, she took to the lady of the manor lifestyle very quickly after they hooked up. Her life was nothing like that before.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously who cares about either of them ? They are washed up actors. Even if they were big stars - who cares???

One of them is washed up but not the other. Partly sexism and ageism - but not all of it.

Neither is washed up, at least not yet. Jolie's Callas film is expected to screen in competition at the Venice film festival this year. Pitt's Wolves is expected to screen out of competition. One is obviously more prestigious than the other. If Callas flops, that could be it for Jolie though. She hasn't made a good film in a long time. Pitt works pretty constantly, maybe cares less about prestige now that he has his Oscar. He is still pulling in huge paychecks though.

Angelina won her Oscar in the 90s and stopped caring about what projects she did. Are we forgetting shark tale? Kung fu panda? Callas will get the nomination but I don't know if it will win obviously.

She also took long stretches of time off, at the peak of her career, to have babies or welcome adopted kids into the household. And was the primary when Brad was a barely functional alcoholic who wasn't around much. She made far more professional sacrifices than he did, as is often the way.

Or maybe he was out working to support this very large family along with the 6 nannies-gotta have one for each kid, team of bodyguards, full staff, and private jets. You make it sound like he was just sitting around drunk holding his member while she did everything. She had her moments of instability too that he had to deal with. They were both a mess.

+1 They're both a mess. I have no sympathy for these celebs who think they're entitled to a lavish lifestyle spending millions per year when they can't afford it. Angelina and Harry/Megan Markle could easily afford a still luxurious lifestyle that 99.99% of people could never afford. But nooo, they demand lots of staff, security, private jets etc. so they can go on egomaniacal world tours as self-appointed mouthpieces. No one is entitled to this.

WTF. Meghan and Harry have absolutely nothing to do with this thread. MDS in full swing.

WTF? If you're going to claim People NEVER does this then it seems natural to point out that yes they do. Don't be dense.

It's just weird. You went on a full rant about two people who have a completely different situation. Harry and Meghan are still married which makes it even weirder. Why not choose another divorced couple. Just seemed deranged to me.

DP. But Angie was clearly one of the people that Meghan wants to emulate, in her ambassadorship and philanthropy (and her disdain for acting). Also her profligacy.

This. Angelina, Harry, and Meghan are all known for demanding that other people pay for their over-the-top extravagant lifestyle that they can't afford because they mistakenly feel entitled to it.

How weird that a daughter of a famous and wealth actor and a literal prince who grew up in a palace would struggle with entitlement…surely that’s some very unique quality they have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m sure Angie didn’t do all she could to foster the kids relationships with someone she hated. But I think people who think he was a great father and this just befell him need their head checked.

Angie in interviews before breakup said he was a great father.

[Anonymous]

Troll still bringing up MM in unrelated threads. She lives rent free in your mind

[Anonymous]

https://pagesix.com/2024/06/08/entertainment/angelina-jolie-has-already-won-the-family-war-against-brad-pitt/

Angelina Jolie is evil personified. Everything we have said in this thread is stated in the article. She uses her children as a weapon against Pitt. Any time he wins something in court, she makes a move to further alienate him from his children. The sources believe that Jolie, not Shiloh, orchestrated the name change as retribution. She is dead set on hurting him. Alienating him from the kids and maliciously selling Miraval may serve her purpose of seeking revenge, but it only hurts the family in the long run.