Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
What are you talking about a team skipped over her? The statement about being happy for a daughter and Shiloh's birth being the happiest day of his life? That statement skips over everyone. Brad's happiest day wasn't the birth of any of his other children? The day any of them were adopted? His wedding day? Any other day in his life? It wasn't about Zahara but someone seems desperate to try to make that connection. It seems like a stupid poorly though out statement that likely isn't even true. Imagine if your dad said the happiest day was the day your sibling was born and not you? That would rub any kid the wrong way. That's why I don't even believe he said that or thinks it. |
PS I never said anything about being happy for her. I don't even know what comment you're talking about. Something at the beginning 98 pages ago? I'm talking about the last 10 or so pages b/c you won't keep harping on this idea that this was a deliberate dig at 1 kid and it's clearly not. |
Of course you don't believe it because you know it's insensitive statement toward Zahara. It's been days and the statement hasn't been removed. His team and therefore Brad meant exactly what was implied. |
Oh. I guess you think none of the other kids matter at all. Why are you obsessed with her? |
Yeah because they generally don’t think she’s infallible and get turned off by how psycho you all get with straw man arguments like saying people who think she might not be the devil are calling her infallible and innocent |
If he said it was the happiest day of his life because he always wanted a daughter then that is in fact a very effed up thing to put out into the public sphere as it does exclude a daughter he had adopted prior to Shilohs birth. Zahara is RELEVANT in this context. People excoriated Chris Pratt for much less |
So he wasn't happy when Vivienne was born? She's chopped liver? Wasn't the happiest day of his life when the other 2 kids were born? Hmmm. |
Denying your kids access to and a relationship with their father is pretty extreme. It's hard to support someone like that or think they are really looking out for the best interests of children. |
Vivienne is younger so by the time she was born he had a daughter therefore that comment was not excluding her. Are you dumb? Do you not know how chronological time works? |
Thank you! There was a reason he has been getting dragged because of that comment. Adopted kids already face enough discrimination. People, even in this thread were hoping it would be a adopted vs bio kid situation. He knows better than that and so does his PR team. |
But purposefully forgetting your oldest daughter is looking out for your children's best interest. |
Again. He has two younger kids, no concern for them?. I guess you think they don't exist or something. But since he doesn't have a history of fighting with tabloids he and all the family are probably just ignoring this for the tabloid trash it is. |
|
| I’m sure Angie didn’t do all she could to foster the kids relationships with someone she hated. But I think people who think he was a great father and this just befell him need their head checked. |
You're purposefully missing the point. Like other celebs Brad's team has had People magazine take qoutes out in the past as well. This should have been change. This is not random star magazine. You know that because you were arguing the "source close to Jolie" meant it was coming from her team. You only changed your stance because you didn't realize Brad's article said the same thing before someone told you. |